The Weaponization of Anti-Semitism50 min read


Note: the addressee is a Jewish woman in the U.K. who claimed that, due to anti-Semitism, she wished to relocate herself and her daughter to Israel.

TO:         Mariam Shaviv

CC:          Jeremy Corbyn

Emily Thornberry

John McDonnell

Baroness Shami Chakrabarti

Katharine Viner, Editor-in Chief, The Guardian

Gideon Falter, Media Watch, Labor Friends of Israel, Jewish Labour,

FROM:    James M. (“Mel”) Rockefeller

RE:          The source of anti-Semitism

I write in response to your professed concerns about anti-Semitism and your desire to change the residency of you and your daughter from the U.K. to the Jewish state (as reported in The Guardian). I write to suggest that you and those copied consider the source of anti-Semitism and address this scourge at its source, ideally before our nations (I am American) are induced to wage war with Iran.

Nations globally are under assault by dual-loyalty Zionists using the charge of anti-Semitism to smear their leaders for their self-interest and Israel’s geopolitical gain. Anyone foolish enough to adopt the entire working definition of anti-Semitism provided by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) is aiding and abetting the destruction of liberal democracy by suppressing free and open criticism of the State of Israel and the hidden tax that its extremists impose on humanity. As the facts of my life experience prove, Zionist extremists deploy myths, well-timed crises, hate-mongering and politicized intelligence to advance an agenda contrary to the core values of democracy—all the while pretending to be the victims of hate residing in a vibrant democracy.

When the calling out of anyone on human rights violations is recast as “hate speech”, one must ask what is the real agenda? If you wish to leave the UK, please leave. Like other Zionists, you will become The Wandering Who, the title of an insightful book by former Israeli Gilad Atzmon. The sequel, Being in Time, further documents the manipulation of identity. His analysis chronicles the ongoing sinister manipulation of Jewish identity by those—like yourself—who have made an art form of displacing facts with myths and manipulated beliefs. Israel was founded on a series of myths, lies and premeditated frauds that have long been at the heart of the Zionist state’s foreign policy. See:

Extremists within the Jewish community create their own problems by deploying the toxic charge of anti-Semitism to deflect criticism of Israeli extremism just as Tel Aviv seeks to induce us to wage yet another unnecessary and unwinnable war—for Greater Israel. Serial Zionist war-mongering goes a long way to explain both the rationale and the timing of the current barrage of attacks on the traditionally anti-war Labour Party.

Hatred toward Jews? 

People don’t hate Jews; they hate the hidden costs that hate-mongering Zionist extremists have imposed on the world since they deceived President Harry Truman to extend nation-state recognition to their enclave of like-minded elites, fanatics and “fascists” (Albert Einstein’s portrayal). Our Joint Chiefs cautioned Truman against recognizing the Zionist experiment as a genuine state. The Pentagon warned our Bible Belt president that, with U.S. recognition, we would be drawn into serial conflicts against our true national interests while leaving us with only military might to exert U.S. influence in that critical region. U.S. military leaders were not anti-Semites; they were realists who were proven correct. Yet under the IHRA guidelines, they could be portrayed as Jew-hating conspiracy theorists.

Likewise for the IHRA claim that charges of dual loyalty signify anti-Semitism. Really? Not according to Deputy National Security Adviser Elliot Abrams and President George W. Bush’s senior adviser (note the irony) for “global democracy strategy.” As Abrams conceded, Jewish law “does indeed separate Jews from their fellow citizens and bind them to each other.” His concerns with seculargovernment trace their origins to the idea that Jews, he explains, “are in a permanent covenant with God and with the land of Israel and its people. Their commitment will not weaken if the Israeli government pursues unpopular policies.”[1]Much as an anti-Semite should be scorned, Abrams argued, so should any Jew who breaks with that “covenantal community with obligations to God.”

There lies the faith-based dutythat binds a transnational corps of sayanim(Hebrew for volunteers or helpers) willing to sacrifice U.S. and U.K. national security on the altar of theircovenant—as the self-described Chosen of God. As Abrams explains:

Outside the land of Israel, there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live. It is the very nature of being Jewish to be apart—except in Israel—from the rest of the population.

What Abrams describes is not dualloyalty. The Zionist “covenant” mandates a singularloyalty—internalizing a propensity to treason by any Jewish Zionists living outsidethe “land of Israel” who shares this belief in a covenant with the Jewish state. Abrams’ rationale of Judaism’s “covenant with God” reflects the “passionate attachment” that George Washington cautioned America to avoid in its foreign alliances. In his farewell address of 1796, our first president urged an avoidance of “entangling alliances” such as now imperil both the U.S. and the U.K. due to our “special relationship” with a theocratic and racist enclave whose founders induced Truman to believethat Zionism was a legitimate basis for sovereignty as a genuine democracy. It never was and never will be. As Israeli historian Israel Shahak explains in Jewish History, Jewish Religion: (1994):

The main danger which Israel, as a “Jewish state” poses to its own people, to other Jews and to its neighbors, is its ideologically motivated pursuit of territorial expansion and the inevitable series of wars resulting from this aim.

As he goes on the explain: “There can no longer be any doubt that the most horrifying acts of oppression in the West Bank are motivated by Jewish religious fanaticism.” If you truly want to identify the source of anti-Semitism, look in the mirror. Deal with your own inner landscape and, please, do not inflict on your daughter your elitist myth of Choseness. When you visited Israel, did you take her for a ride on one of Israel’s “Jews only” highways overlooking Palestine? Did you travel in a bullet-proof vehicle? If so, did you explain to her why your neighbors have reason to hate you? Who, really, is responsible for your daughter (and you) feeling unsafe and insecure in the U.K.?

The Source of Antisemitism

On New Year’s Day 1995, Guilford Glazer phoned me and asked my views on the source of anti-Semitism. My response was simple, “Your own community”.  My life’s work proves that I’ve been stalked my entire life by those at the core of deploying charges of “anti-Semitism” and “hatred toward Jews” to advance what led to the creation of the Jewish state, the disastrous US/Israel relationship and the emergence of the expansive Israel lobby as (unregistered) foreign agents operating nonstop to undermine U.S. (and U.K.) national interests on behalf of an extremism that never would have enjoyed support if only we had known the Zionists’ true intentions. As my personal experience proves, this duplicitous “special friendship” was used to systematically destroy our national security.

The Trump presidency was produced by pro-Israelis for Israeli extremists to secure Jerusalem, to negate the Iran nuclear accord, to create more settlements, to end negotiations on a two-state solution, to support a military alliance between Tel Aviv and Riyadh (and the UAE) and to provide deficit-financed tax cuts that disproportionately enriched the pro-Israeli Right. For example, Trump supporter and casino magnate Sheldon Adelson realized a $700 million windfall.

As a reliable supporter of Zionist extremism with a personal fortune exceeding $38 billion, he and Mariam, his equally rightwing Israeli wife, could donate the entire $700 million to Birthright Israel, a clever psyop that offers impressionable Jewish youth free trips to Israel to discover their Inner Zionist and replenish the Israeli Right’s sayanim corps. Preying on impressionable youth is a common tactic as you will see in the Appendix describing how Duck & Cover (a 1951 film financed by a Zionist extremist) targeted American schoolchildren with the fear and insecurity required to gain traction for the Cold War narrative, a highly profitable predecessor to the profitableClash of Civilizationsnarrative.

The electorally victorious Adelsons were provided prime seating at the Trump inaugural, ensuring they were the first supporters Trump saw when he stepped onto the platform to take the oath of office as “our” president. For the seating chart at the January 2017 Trump presidential inaugural, see addition to the $5 million that the Adelsons provided the inaugural, they gave at least $30 million to support the Trump campaign. It’s not yet known how much they spent indirectly.

From the outset, the Adelsons, publishers of the largest circulation ultra-rightwing (free) newspaper in Israel, insisted that Trump renounce the Iran nuclear accord. By all accounts, Iran complied with its terms. This Zionist power couple were also present in Israel when a U.S. government building in Jerusalem was rededicated as the U.S. embassy, a long-planned provocation. To play to Israel’s political base in the U.S., the event was both opened and closed by a pastor from the evangelical Christian Right. For the role played by Zionist extremists in producing a narrow Electoral College victory for Trump with the help of online voter profiling—aided by a behavior manipulation firm (Facebook) led by Mark Zuckerberg, see: “Donald Trump—The Last President for Greater Israel”

Will the Deception Ever End?

Zionists’ never-wavering record of deception dates from no later than the Balfour Declaration in 1917. An agreement to extract the “founding document” of the Zionist enterprise from the British Foreign Office was secured in return for help from the broad-based Jewish Zionist community in inducing Woodrow Wilson to enter the First World War. With Robert Morgenthau his campaign finance chairman in both 1912 and 1916, this Princeton academic was reelected November 7, 1916 on the platform, “He kept us out of the war.” Following a series of maritime crises, we entered the war in April 1917.

On November 2, British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour signed a two-sentence letter to British banker Walter Rothschild evidencing “sympathy for Jewish Zionist aspirations” and viewing “with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” with the (telling) caveat: “…it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine….” Consistent with their nonstop deceit, Zionists embraced the “national home” language they sought, reinterpreted it as “nation state” and ignored language obliging them to recognize in return the rights promised to Palestinians.

Get a copy of Miko Peled’s book, The General’s Sonchronicling the facts of the Zionists’ provocative 1967 land grab versus your false beliefs reliant on self-created myths about endangered Jews. I know firsthand the problem that facts pose for Zionists. When the facts cannot be reconciled with the myths (e.g., of their Chosenness), Zionists smear as an anti-Semite anyone challenging their myths. Please do that with me on a record where I can sue you.Be assured I will in UK courts. Before choosing that path, I urge that you study the facts and analyses on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.comand in Miko Peled’s book:

The Zionists’ duplicitous modus operandi, including their routine displacement of facts with manipulated beliefs (e.g., Iraqi WMD), dates from antiquity. The only modern component of this ancient form of warfare is the technologically enhanced means to deceive on a grand scale. Thus it came as no surprise to find that the Mark Zuckerberg-led Facebook played a mission-critical role in enabling Cambridge Analytica’s psychographic profiling and the targeting of enough voters in key electoral states to put asset Donald Trump in the White House as Commander-in Chief—for Israel. Facebook’s weaponization of online data remains ongoing. Zuckerberg claimed he didn’t know. He knew. Facebook was used to do what that platform was designed to do. That’s why son-in-law Jared Kushner retained the Facebook specialists at Cambridge Analytica to manage that electoral psyop.

The Perception of Jews

IHRA guidelines also mention “a certain perception of Jews” as indicative of anti-Semitism. Both the U.S. and the U.K. are quickly reaching a tipping point. If the obscene costs imposed on us by this duplicitous relationship are not quickly acknowledged by Tel Aviv, the broader Jewish community risks seeing Jews become synonymous with endangering our national security—an issue I discussed with Guilford Glazer in 1995!His initial fortune traces to his role in helping construct the Oak Ridge nuclear facility in Tennessee. Knoxville-based Glazer Steel then became a wealthy war profiteer, providing metal for armaments during the Vietnam War, an earlier ill-advised, unnecessary and unwinnable war that, like the war in Iraq, proved profitable for those who induced us to wage it.

Glazer was also a primary financier behind the relocation of Russian Jews to Israel to support Likud Party extremism as a successor to Irgun fanaticism. As you know, a debate continues to rage regarding how many of those Russian emigres are genuinely “Jewish.” Those within the Zionist community who are in factdeceiving both Jews and non-Jews have been stalking me non-stop for the last 36 years. Why? Because they know that my life experience proves the who, the (nonlinear) how and the why of their ongoing geostrategic duplicity. Without fail, those complicit profit with every deception. That includes a series of nation-scale financial frauds into which I was drawn because those stalking me (initially to get to my father) were also orchestrating those frauds, including the nationwide savings and loan fraud, the 2000 fraud (a classic financial “pump-and-dump”) and the Enron fraud.

Study the facts of my firsthand experience and then ask yourself: “Am I supposed to pretend there is not a ‘Jewish conspiracy’ even when my personal experience provesit?” No one familiar with my experience could credibly embrace the IHRA prohibition against any mention of “the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy.” Myth? So how is it that I could be stalked in the U.S., the U.K. and in my travels worldwide with legal impunity? Who could possibly wield such influence at the local, state, national and international level? Who has the means, motive and opportunity?

Study the facts and analyses in the online chapters for The Hidden Tax on Humanity and explain how what I’ve experience is nota worldwide Jewish conspiracy. Those who theorizeabout such a conspiracy may well be anti-Semites. The problem for Zionists is this: my life experience both provesit beyond any reasonable doubt andprovides the tools for those deceived to see it for themselves. How could complicit agents within the F.B.I. and the D.I.A. (Defense Intelligence Agency) stalk me and my colleagues in numerous states and in foreign countries and not be indicted? Who covers for them? How could anyone familiar with these facts suggest, even in jest, that Israel is not a huge problem?

Without the Jewish Holocaust, there would not be a Jewish state. Zionists required the widespread internalization of fear and insecurity to persuade the broader Jewish community to embrace Zionist extremism. Moderate Jews rejected Zionism until the (long pre-staged) “heroic” Six-Day War of June 1967 was deployed to reenergize that fear and insecurity. Many Jews active in the civil rights movement dropped out in favor of proving their loyalty to Zionism. They knew they could not reconcile their support for civil rights in the U.S. while endorsing Israel’s serial abuse of Palestinians.

Nonstop Deceit

Few Americans realize that Mathilde Krim, a “former” Irgun operative, struck up an affair with Lyndon Johnson such that she was “servicing” our Commander-in-Chief in the White Housethe night that Israel began its June 1967 aggression. Her husband, Arthur, was then president of United Artists (there’s often a Hollywood connection) and chairman of the campaign finance committee for the party led by the man (LBJ) his wife was servicing. One can only ponder what might have happened had Bill Clinton paid attention to the emerging terrorist threat and not been distracted by impeachment charges that trace to him being serviced in the White House by Monica Lewinsky. As my life experience proves, those profiled have long manipulated sex and sexuality. The circumstances of my out-of-wedlock birth in 1952 were deployed to preemptively compromise my father’s prospects for the U.S. presidency.

Absent the horrors of WWII, the pliable and pathetic Zionist Christian Harry Truman, a political product of Jewish-dominated organized crime in Kansas City, could not have prevailed over the opposition of our Joint Chiefs, our intelligence services and our diplomatic corps to recognize this enclave as meriting nation-state status. U.S. Secretary of State George Marshall was livid that U.S. national security would take a back seat to domestic political considerations—i.e., Clark Clifford’s fundraising from potential Jewish-Zionist contributors to Truman’s 1948 reelection campaign.

Then as now, Zionists lied repeatedly to us about their true intentions. As we now know, they never meant to recognize the rights of Palestinians—despite their assurances to the contrary. We also know that these Jewish extremists (and terrorists) viewed the agreed-to bounds of that initial enclave as merely a foothold from which they could steadily expand Greater Israel. Even now, the boundaries of the Jewish state remain a work-in-progress. Zionist leader Chaim Weissman provided a seven-page handwritten letter to Truman replete with promises that Zionists would not create what Israel quickly became: a theocratic, racist and apartheid state.

The lies have never stopped. Nor will they. The facts confirm that Jewish extremists preyed on Jewish identity when they founded the (failed) Zionist experiment. Seventy years is enough. People do not hate Jews, period, full stop. The danger that you and your daughter face is one of guilt by association. You can best protect yourselves by you helping protect the U.K. (and the U.S.) from those chronicled in these accounts. That includes challenging the facts deployed by the Campaign on Anti-Semitism to prove its prevalence. On that key deceit, I suggest you consult former Israeli Gilad Atzmon who (a) was university-trained as a mathematician, and (b) understands from personal experience the manipulation of Jewish identity. He was born in Israel to a Zionist family and served in the Israel Defense Forces—where he experienced firsthand the racism that typifies Zionist policy.

Jewish Nazis?

In December 1948, Albert Einstein and 27 other prominent Jews described Irgun members (political predecessors to rightwing extremists of the Likud Party coalition) as terrorists, gangsters and fascists who seek a “Leader State” similar “to the Nazi and Fascist parties.” Yet IHRA guidelines brand as “anti-Semitic” anyone who compares Israeli policy to the Nazis even though Jewish novelist Hannah Arendt described members of Israel’s so-called “Freedom Party” as “Jewish Nazis.” Anyone who objects to the comparison should focus on ensuring that Israeli policy does not merit it.

An Israeli general and a former Israeli prime minister acknowledged that the “defensive” Six-Day War of 1967 was a provocative land grab that had been planned since 1951. Likewise for the Zionists’ Sinai Campaign of November 1956 (aka the Suez Crisis) launched during the last week of President Eisenhower’s re-election campaign. Likewise for other well-timed provocations and crises, including Operation Cast Lead—timed to begin two days after Christmas 2008 and conclude two days before the January 2009 inauguration of Barack Obama. Among Israeli war-planners, that period is well known as political “down time” as we change administrations. That’s why Israeli war-planners chose that exact time to launch a crisis that killed some 1,400 Palestinians, including the use of children as targets, as later conceded by Israeli soldiers. With “friends” like this, who needs enemies?

Consider Suez from the perspective of Israel Shahak, a firsthand witness to much of the madness, fanaticism and outright psychopathy that masquerade as nation-state legitimacy:

In 1956 I eagerly swallowed all of Ben-Gurion’s political and military reasons for Israel initiating the Suez War, until he…pronounced in the Knesset on the third day of that war, that the real reason for it is “the restoration of the kingdom of David and Solomon” to its Biblical borders. At this point in his speech, almost every Knesset member spontaneously rose and sang the Israeli national anthem.[2]

Religious fanaticism in the guise of nation-state legitimacy is precisely what senior U.S. military officers most feared in the post-WWII era, and rightly so. So did those within the moderate Jewish community in both the U.S. and the U.K who opposed legitimizing Zionist extremism by recognizing the Zionist enterprise as a nation-state. Why don’t Americans grasp the depth and duration of this deceit? Under IHRA guidelines, anyone suggesting that media shares an undisclosed pro-Israel bias risks being tarred as an anti-Semite. That’s a brilliant (albeit sociopathic) strategy. After all, how can anyone prove they’re notsomething (an anti-Semite) that they never were? Clever, no?

Yet consider this: how could we publish in February 2017 an analysis of a November 2016 psyop— more widely known as a U.S. presidential election—that put asset Donald Trump in the White House? Yet “our” mainstream media did not report on that nationwide fraud until March 2018 and only after it was mentioned in a U.K. publication. How does one explain that? Yet to suggest a pro-Israel media bias or even an undisclosed bias risks dismissal as an anti-Semite. See “Donald Trump—The Last President for Greater Israel” also “Donald Trump—Weapon of Mass Destruction” published March 2017:

Does the IHRA Seek to Protect or Silence?

What, really, is the motive behind the 11 examples of anti-Semitism published by the IHRA? If the goal is to protect Jews from anti-Semitism, many of the examples offered are well wide of the mark. Indeed, compliance with several of them may endanger the broader Jewish community by obscuring the need to hold those I profiled accountable at law. Using charges of anti-Semitism to conceal the source of ongoing criminality is a particularly venal form of aiding and abetting.

Imagine anyone suggesting, even pictorially, that Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians mirrors the Nazi’s treatment of the Jews. That too, by IHRA standards, is deemed anti-Semitic. Outraged at the Israeli slaughter of some 400 children during Operation Cast Lead, University of California Santa Barbara Professor Bill Robinson posted online a side-by-side pictorial essay (previously published in Adbusters) depicting demonstrably similar behavior. A picture is worth a thousand words.

Abe Foxman, then national enforcer for the Anti-Defamation League (part of B’nai B’rith – aka “sons of the covenant”), blindsided Robinson by persuading the UCSB Chancellor to summon the professor to his office where his job was threatened. As a tenured professor and a secular Jew with two small children, he was understandably scared. The clear intent of that psyop: to silence him and, by intimidating a tenured professor on a high-profile U.S. campus, serve notice that academic opposition to Israeli extremism could put your job at risk. It was not lost on Foxman & Co. that on-campus opposition is what brought an end to America’s lengthy participation in a war in Southeast Asia that began when Truman was induced to engage the U.S. in Vietnam. Concerned academics are still searching for how to bring an end to Zionists’ seven-decade war on Palestine.

When colleague Jeff Gates visited Professor Robinson on the UCSB campus during this intimidation and silencing campaign, he had only one question, “Are they going to kill me?” Recall that heartfelt response next time you seek to discredit a critic of the Zionist enterprise as an anti-Semite. And consider the impact on his children as well as on your daughter if this systemic and geostrategic deceitis not quickly addressed at its source. Those I profiled for decades while being stalked are thugs and gangsters who routinely deploy intimidation to silence their critics. What those responsible most fear is truth and transparency. With both now emerging at a steadily increasing pace, watch for those complicit to grow ever more desperate as they run for cover—and find there is none.

A Coordinated Silencing Campaign?

How could such intimidation proceed unchallenged at one of the nation’s foremost universities? Was it just coincidence that those with authority in the University of California system shared a pro-Israel bias? Mark Yudoff, president of the University of California, could have intervened in the on-campus events that caused Professor Robinson to fear for his life. He declined. Richard Blum, chair of the Board of Regents, could have intervened. He too declined. Why? Is there a common denominator at work in the failure to oppose Abe Foxman and the ADL?

Yudoff’s wife, Judith, was then the immediate past international president of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism representing 760 synagogues. Blum’s wife, U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein, then chaired the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence with this nation then waging an unnecessary war reliant on false intelligence. Is it “anti-Semitic” to report these facts? Or the fact that her husband made a fortune as a defense contractor for a war that could have been prevented had the facts of my life experience been engaged in good faith in the U.K. in December 2001? As her constituent, I repeatedly sought to meet with Senator Feinstein dating to April 2003. I was ignored. Why?

What might be the current condition of our nations had I been engaged in good faith on my return from Baghdad in February 1997 with evidence of no WMD, an offer from Iraq’s senior sheikhs to remove Saddam Hussein without a war (to which he had reportedly agreed) and an in-country offer to provide U.S. firms with many of the reconstruction and oil contracts. Who benefitted when I was not only not engaged but instead was stalked with the complicity of those insideour government?

Let’s take this string of coincidences another step. Former Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano succeeded to Yudoff’s posh job as president of the UC system and presently resides in a charming University-provided mansion in balmy Berkeley, California. In December 2005, as an Arizona resident I provided Gov. Napolitano and her Attorney General, Terry Goddard, a three-volume set of facts and analyses that, if then engaged in good faith, could have exposed the common source of this still-ongoing geostrategic duplicity, systemic criminality and political corruption. By ignoring those materials, did that qualify her to be appointed “our” Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)—where she continued to ignore these facts and analyses?

That leads me to ask the next obvious question: Was DHS, with a current $47.5 billion annual budget, founded to protect the U.S. from Islamicextremists? Or was it created to protect those I profiled from an informed and outraged public? IHRA guidelines suggest that just asking that question qualifies me as an “anti-Semite”. Who can explain why the research and analyses pivoting off my life experience have yet to be engaged in good faith and the facts followed wherever they may lead? Should I be concerned that Ms. Napolitano’s predecessor, Michael Chertoff, was the son of a rabbi? Or that his wife co-chaired a regional Anti-Defamation League committee on human rights? Throughout my life, I have been denied the basic American/human right of equal access to the law. Who can explain that?

DHS expenditures from 2001 to 2011 totaled an estimated $648.6 billion. How much of that taxpayer-funded outlay can credibly be traced to costs associated with this “special friendship”? Is it “anti-Semitic” to inquire? How much have U.S. taxpayers spent on protecting synagogues and Jewish community centers? Why would that be necessary? In March 2017, Israeli teenager Michael Kadar was arrested for making at least 245 threatening calls to Jewish Community Centers and schools in the U.S. What impact did that fraud have on the magnitude of pending DHS appropriations? Were those well-timed crises a nonlinearform of fundraising? Because those incidents induced fear and insecurity within the Jewish community in the U.S., the ADL tallied them as anti-Semitic incidents. 

Fields Within Fields…with Fields

The silencing campaign against Professor Robinson succeeded. By the time the Vice-Chancellor to UCSB Chancellor Henry Yang opposed a statewide, ADL-coordinated intimidation campaign, including calls from Jewish donors threatening to withhold or cancel bequests to the university, news had spread nationwide that academics critical of Israeli extremism could put at risk themselves, their families and their careers. Only after 100 UCSB professors signed a supportive petition was the threat to Robinson’s tenure suspended. By then the Zionist objective (silencing Israel’s critics) was achieved.

One Jewish extremist key to organizing that intimidation campaign was Marvin Hier, a rabbi with the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles. I first encountered Hier in the early 1990s, well before anyone knew my true identity as a Rockefeller. He knew. It came as no surprise that he was the Zionist chosen to speak at the Trump inaugural. Should I view that choice as just another coincidence? Or is this further evidence of howthis nonlinear duplicity proceeds through “fields within fields…within fields” of relationships? That phrase was chosen as the title to describe a series of essays by noted psychologists (published 1968-1972) edited by Julius Stulman, former president of B’nai B’rith.

Happily, Prof. Robinson and other academics targeted by the ADL Thought Police (and the U.K.’s Campaign Against Anti-Semitism) are no longer intimidated by these gangsters, fanatics and fascists. In 2017, Robinson and 15 other concerned academics published a collection of essays describing their experience with Jewish extremists and their campaigns to intimidate and silence on-campus critics through organizations such as Campus Watch. See We Will Not Be Silenced—The Academic Repression of Israel’s Critics.

Opposition to Jewish Extremism—at What Cost?

President John F. Kennedy and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy sought to force Zionists to (a) shutter their nuclear weapons program, and (b) register their expansive lobby as what it was and remains: foreign agents. It’s no secret that Zionists lobbied policymakers in the U.S. and the U.K. to wage serial wars—in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran. Those twin initiatives died with the death of JFK in November 1963. Zionists risked their revival five years later with RFK’s surging presidential campaign. That threat to Zionism died in June 1968 when this Zionist skeptic was also murdered.

Had those two initiatives succeeded in the early 1960s, we would inhabit a far different nation and, quite likely, a far more peaceful world. When, on June 8, 1967, Israeli forces, with clear premeditation, killed 34 Americans with an attack on the U.S.S. Liberty (and injured another 173), it became clear to game theory war-planners in Tel Aviv that there was no limit to the terror that Zionists could inflict on Americans with impunity.

See Chapter 1 of Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to Wartitled, “Game Theory and the Mass Murder of 9/11”

We continue to increase U.S. taxpayer support for Zionist extremists and provide them sophisticated U.S.-developed weaponry to maintain the Israeli Right’s “qualitative edge” in waging war in the region. In 2016, during the Obama presidency, Tel Aviv was granted a ten-year $38 billion appropriation, even as they pursue a costly space program to put “Jews on the moon.”[3]Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist government persuaded Trump to make the world less secure by abandoning the Iran nuclear accord. Democrat or Republican in the White House makes no substantive difference when it comes to supporting this “special relationship”. The Israel lobby ensures that Israeli extremists get what they want regardless of their behavior and regardless of the blowback on the U.S., the U.K. and the world.

One could rightly argue that U.S. taxpayers paid for the bullets used by Israeli snipers to kill at least 110 Palestinian protestors (including 58 in one day) over a six-week protest commemorating the 70thyear of the Nakba (“Catastrophe”) marking the Israeli destruction of Palestinian homes and villages when the Zionist experiment began in 1948. More than 2,700 were injured including at least 1,359 from live ammunition. The dead included six under age 18, including a 15-year old girl and a medic.

The War in Iraq Have Been Prevented

It’s clear that, had my life experience been investigated in good faithon my return from Iraq in February 1997, the war in Iraq could have been prevented. That unnecessary and unwinnable war is on track to cost the U.S. alone $6 trillion, including $4 trillion in interest paid through 2053. A timely in-depth investigation likely also would have uncovered the lengthy pre-staging required for the mass murder of 9/11. An investigation pivoting off my firsthand experience also may have uncovered the (then ongoing) pre-staging of the false intelligence on which we were induced to rely (e.g., Iraqi WMD) to wage a war in response to that long-planned provocation. As we now know, that costly war was waged in support of an expansive agenda for the region long sought by Zionists—for Greater Israel. Our Joint Chiefs warned us seven costly decades ago.

The presidency of Christian Zionist Republican George W. Bush was “produced” by those I profiled. Like Trump, his many dysfunctions were widely known, easily profiled and readily manipulated. See online my April 2016 memo to Prescott Bush, son of Governor Jeb Bush, suggesting how, had “Dubya” been man enough to admit his mistakes and identify those who deceived him, his brother might now be president. Jeb rightly predicted that Donald Trump would be a “chaos” president. See:


The same serial stalking to which I continue to be subjected personallyalso remains ongoing geopolitically. For example, those I profiled routinely befriended me in order to stalk me. Likewise, Zionists befriended the U.S. and the U.K. in order to betray us. Without exception, they manipulated both our nations, including deceiving us to wage theirwars while systematically underminingournational interests. Israeli behavior is not that of victims but serial predators who use the perceptionof victimhood (and friendship) to “wage war by way of deception” (the motto of the Israeli intelligence services). My life experience proves how Zionists leverage their small numbers to have a global impact.

For additional proof of HOW this nonlinear manipulation proceeds in plain sight, review The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented. Jack Straw, Foreign Secretary in Tony Blair’s government, could have prevented the war in Iraq after 9/11 had he met with me in December 2001, as requested. For evidence confirming the consistent role played by Jewish extremists in putting the world—and you—at risk, review the facts and analyses in The Indonesia Connection, the Poland Connection the Iran Connection.

What are the geostrategic implications of this Jewish extremism? Consider the probability that an education project of mine agreed to in China in 2000 (with an initial reach of 235 million schoolchildren and their parents) was undermined with the help of the same (Jewish) law firm that undermined the Kennedy brothers when they sought in the early 1960s to require foreign agent registration for the Zionist Organization of America. With the murder of Jack Kennedy and his replacement by Vice President Lyndon Johnson, the ZOA morphed into AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee), a key component of the influential Israel lobby composed of at least 600 organizations. Yet not one of them has been required to register as a foreign agent. Why?

Note how long ago the recent emergence of China’s economic and military strength was pre-staged with the influence of Jewish advisers to Mao Zedong. See online The China Connection. this further proof of howwar is waged (by deception) on democracies by those I profiled while being stalked? Review the online draft timeline (1850-2017) documenting how I was drawn into the “fields-within-fields…within fields” of relationship through which those profiled proceed in plain sight yet non-transparently and, to date, with legal impunity.

Never Again?

Had the Zionist founders of the Jewish state informed us of their trueintentions, they could not have induced us to put at risk our national security, our people and our future. As any objective student of this subject knows, the U.S.-Israeli relationship is a chronicle of non-stop deceit, exploitation and lies that remains ongoing globally. Is that what we now see in the “anti-Semitism” campaign against the anti-war Labour Party? When an informed public grasps the depth and duration of this duplicity, they may never again trust those who induced us to extend nation-state recognition to this enclave.

Their inhumane treatment of Palestinians alone has created issues globally for Jews. The source of this emergent “hatred for Jews” traces to the current generation of Zionist extremists whose lineage includes those who lied to Truman to induce U.S. recognition seven costly decades ago. Support for the Zionist state is growing thin as the U.S. and the U.K. are now hated for our role in condoning repeated human rights abuses while discrediting the U.N. with our vetoes of resolutions directed at those serial abuses. Both our nations appear guilty by association. Our citizens continue to be put at risk by our commitment to this “unbreakable bond.” The best way to protect your daughter is to insist on personal accountability for those responsible, an essential lesson for any parent to teach a child.

The U.N. headquarters buildings in Manhattan were constructed on land acquired with funds donated by my grandfather at the urging of my birthfather, Nelson Rockefeller. In 1964, during his second of four terms as Governor or New York, he identified the source of this geostrategic deceit with a generic, ethnicity-free phrase, describing those responsible as sharing a “tireless genius for crisis.” When a critical mass of people grasps the common source of these well-timed crises, the longevity and the perceivedlegitimacy of the Jewish state will come directly into question. The greatest threat to Jews are other Jews who continue to “act out” the myth of Choseness while avoiding the facts that prove Zionist extremism has long levied a hidden tax on humanity, a tax that is poised to increase.

Should you and others within the Chosen community choose to relocate to Israel, note that the lifespan of the “Jewish state” is now in question. “Nation-state” legislation recently enacted by the ultraorthodox majority of a rightwing-dominated Knesset invalidates Israel’s (already questionable) status as a democracy. Israel has become what Zionist leaders assured Truman it would never become: a theocratic enclave with racist and apartheid policies.

This duplicity remains ongoing and, judging by past experience, will continue until stopped. Those responsible cannot stop. What can they plausibly say to those on whom this hidden tax has long been levied: “Sorry ‘bout that?” Accountability is coming; the only question is how soon and for whom. Those who continue to choose their “covenant” with the Jewish state risk being portrayed as guilty by association. That’s an outcome moderate and secular Jews foresaw and rightly feared when they too opposed Harry Truman’s deceit-induced nation-state recognition of Zionism in 1948.

The expansive Campaign Against Anti-Semitism created a crisis (ironically, a crisis of legitimacy) for the U.K. political party most inclined to oppose another war. To what extent does this well-timed crisis enhance the probability that politically weakened Tories could be induced (again with false intelligence?) to join another “coalition of the willing” and follow a Trump-led U.S. to war in Iran? Forget whether that outcome is the goal of the Campaign, should that be the practical effect, what then do you tell your daughter? Should that be the result, who then will believe that the Campaign, its leadership and its supporters solely sought to protect Jews from anti-Semitism?

The Cost of Misplaced Loyalty

I would advise backing off your attack on the anti-war Labour Party. This latest gambit will in time turn on those within the Jewish community who deploy anti-Semitism as a sympathy-inducing front to deflect criticism of an extremist minority determined to dominate the majority. Other than those ultraorthodox supporters of Zionist extremism within the Knesset’s Likud-led coalition, no one is willing to allow such dominance over others. Certainly no one would choose the indignity of such dominance for themselves or their families. Would you? Informed Jewish youth are turning against this extremism. The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism is adding fuel to that fire. That’s their choice.

When Israeli critic Gilad Atzmon chronicled how the Campaign was manipulating their numbers and even manufacturing anti-Semitic incidents, he was subjected to a costly legal challenge by Campaign founder Gideon Falter and his well-heeled supporters. After the two sides agreed to submit a legal definition of “meaning” to the court, High Court Justice Matthew Nicklin preempted that agreed-to hearing by submitting his own definition—which ensured that Mr. Atzmon could not prevail. That preemptivedecree forced him to settle and, most galling of all, required that he offer an apology despite knowing that he can prove—beyond any doubt—how the Campaign manipulates statistics to prey on Jewish identity, fear and insecurity, a subject in which Mr. Atzmon is an acknowledged expert.

Among the High Court Justices that could have been assigned to hear this case at this time(i.e., as Zionist extremists seek a war with Iran), is it “anti-Semitic” to inquire how many of those Justices served as law clerks—as did Justice Nicklin—for a Jewish Supreme Court Justice (Australian Supreme Court Justice David Levine)? Is it “anti-Semitic” to ponder whether the outcome in this case is purely coincidental? Could this be another example of how Zionist extremists manipulate outcomes—in a nonlinear fashion? Did Nicklin know what he was enabling?

For an overview of how my life experience provesthe common source of this trans-generational duplicity, transnational hate-mongering and ongoing criminality, study the draft chapters for The Hidden Tax on Humanityon www.hiddentaxonhumanity.comYou will also find there several chapters from Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to Warchronicling howthis duplicity proceeds in plain sight. In that 2008 release, I am identified only as John Doe. [The appendix features several book jacket blurbs.]

As the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism was launched in earnest against the Labour Party, an in-depth analysis was provided in March 2018 to Jeremy Corbyn,several shadow ministers, members of the media and numerous Campaign-supportive activists leading the effort to discredit, intimidate and silence the anti-war party—by portraying its leadership as anti-Semites. That analysis appears as an appendix and was published on the Hidden Tax on Humanity website. See: It includes links to 20-plus analyses documenting how this nonlinearmental and emotional manipulation operates in plain sight yet non-transparently while escaping the attention of those trained in linearjurisprudence.

Facts vs. Beliefs

The most extreme of Jewish extremists now wield virtual control over both the Knesset and the U.S. presidency—through the Chabad Lubavitch devotees who proved critical in producing the presidency of narcissist Donald Trump, a classic asset acting out his (easily profiled) unfulfilled needs while endangering the entire world. The origins of his purported wealth trace directly to three sectors long dominated by (Jewish) organized crime: casinos, pop culture (The Apprentice) and commercial real estate in midtown Manhattan. Yet to suggest Jewish control of “government or other societal institutions” runs afoul of IHRA guidelines—regardless of the facts. For additional documentation, see “The True Extremists “

Roy Cohn, an infamous attorney for (Jewish-dominated) organized crime in New York, served both as counsel and personal mentor to “The Donald” whose many known dysfunctions include reliance on the advice of daughter Ivanka, a convert to Chabad Lubavitch (Yael is her given Jewish name). Chabad Lubavitch is comprised of ultraorthodox Hasidic Jews whose sect traces its modern-day origins to Russia/Lithuania of the 1770s. The illegitimacy of Donald Trump’s presidency is beyond question—as he knows. Thus the intensity of his emphasis on discrediting Russiancollusion. On that point, see my June 2018 memo to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau:

See also my June 2017 memo to the four generals (now three) in the Trump Administration reminding them that their Constitutional oath of office obliges them to protect the Office of the President from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. They are not obliged to protect a particular occupantof that Office and certainly not a presidency whose administration traces to a social media-enabled fraud on the U.S. public orchestrated on behalf of foreign interests. Russians meddled but Zionist extremists producedthis presidency See:

When a naïve, trusting and long-deceived public grasps the magnitude of this hidden tax and realizes the scope, scale and duration of this ongoing fraud, they will look to you and others associated with the Campaign seeking to silence critics and obscure facts confirming the costs—in both blood and treasure—imposed by the duplicitous few at the core of this “special” relationship.

Until this threat is addressed candidly and directly at its source, it is destined to worsen as those complicit turn to their “tireless genius for crisis” as a means to misdirect attention, obscure the facts and mobilize in defense those who subscribe to the myth that Israel is an ally and a friend. Those most susceptible to this faith-based fraud include evangelical Zionist Christians who composed much of the political base for George W. Bush as he was deceived to lead the U.S. (and the U.K.) to war in Iraq—for Greater Israel. Those Zionist enthusiasts now support Donald Trump and Mike Pence, his True Believing, Bible-thumping Vice President as both men nudge us closer to war with Iran.

The existential threat facing Israel is not Iran but the confirmed facts of what my life experience proves. As Gilad Atzmon points out, at the heart of the problem is not Jewishness but self-chosen Choseness. Anyone who believes—Truly Believes—that they are Chosen is, by their choice, “Jewish.” Is that what you believe? Does that choice make you “Jewish”? Is that what you teach your daughter? If so, you are choosing, by your embrace of this myth, to put both of you in harm’s way. Anti-Semites are not responsible for your daughter feeling unsafe. The threat is the ongoing delay in ensuring accountability for Zionist sociopaths who continue to manipulate Jewish (and Zionist Christian) identity and imbed their duplicitous operations inside our governments.


On March 31, 2018, the following memo was provided by colleague Jeff Gates to Media Watch and other organizations affiliated with the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism. The memo was titled, “Countering Anti-Semitism with Education: Guilt By Associationand The Hidden Tax on Humanity.” The memo was also provided to numerous shadow ministers, including those copied above. A copy was also provided to David Miliband, Labour Party Foreign Secretary in the Gordon Brown government.

< ——- >

I write to assist your work at UK Media Watch combatting anti-Semitism in the U.K., an effort I whole-heartedly support. You’ll find an in-depth analysis of anti-Semitism in the book below. Your readers will want to know about it as the facts and analyses it provides offer a powerful means to expose and counter anti-Semitism at a time-critical juncture in the U.K., the U.S. and worldwide. I am an American writing this while in London.

Guilt By Association includes the attached materials explaining the “Internal Diaspora”, the New Anti-Semitism and the use of agentsassets and sayanim when waging war. And, importantly, when inducing others to wage wars against their true interests, as with the war in Iraq and ongoing attempts to induce the U.S. to commence a war with Iran by unregistered foreign agents.

Several chapters from that book are posted here and on along with numerous draft chapters for the next in a series of books titled The Hidden Tax on Humanity. That series confirms the nonlinear nature of ongoing treason both in the U.K. and the U.S. That treason includes routine use of the charge of anti-Semitism to preclude sustained engagement with the facts and analysis required to protect the broad-based Jewish community from those who deploy anti-Semitism as a means to obscure their treason.

You’ll also find on the site numerous topical analyses proving how duplicity proceeds in plain sight. And how facts are displaced with manipulated beliefs, as with Iraqi WMD. [See attached submission to the Chilcot Inquiry.] And the use of agents and assets to imbed in the public’s consciousness agenda-advancing narratives—in plain sight, often with the manipulation of media. Psy-op publications routinely make it onto best-seller lists, as with the narrative-enabling books published by Jerome Corsi (see here).

Much of the feedback on these facts and analyses comes from the broad-based Jewish community grateful that we’ve demonstrated with this work the care, professionalism and love required to distinguish that broader community from the hate-mongers, war-mongers and duplicitous few chronicled in these accounts.

A former U.S. Secretary of Defense coined a useful phrase (“the people in between”) to describe the most challenging combatants when waging today’s unconventional warfare, largely though the use of deception. This article on the exploitation of thought and emotion chronicles the top five “in between” domains where such combatants operate: media, popular culture, politics, think tanks and education. Pop culture has long played a key narrative-advancing role in information warfare, often displacing facts with faith, an ancient modus operandi exemplified by this December 1960 release.

Combating anti-Semitism is largely an education challenge requiring proof of how an extremist and manipulative few prey on Jewish identity while also making the broader community appear…guilty by association. It’s difficult to imagine a greater peril to that community.’

We are confident that anti-Semitism can be addressed by engaging organizations such as yours to join forces in documenting the all important “how” of the duplicity detailed in the materials found in the book and online. Happily the modus operandi of those profiled is limited and repetitive so once one grasps the how, the who becomes apparent and transparent as those profiled routinely prey on the beliefs of others.

Our goal is to prove beyond any reasonable doubt the how, the who and the why behind this nonlinear manipulation of thought and emotion so that a naive and trusting public — including the broader Jewish community — can protect themselves from those who, if not quickly exposed and held accountable at law, will continue to impose a hidden tax on humanity. The cost of that tax clearly exceeds tens of trillions of dollars (the war in Iraq alone is on track to exceed $6 trillion). The cost in foregone possibilities far exceeds the financial outlays. No one can compute the costs in human suffering and the impact on our habitat. Thus the title, The Hidden Tax on Humanity.

The who that presently pose the greatest danger to the Jewish community are those extremists who placed this latest asset in the White House to take the U.S. into yet another war against our interests. As documented in The War In Iraq Could Have Been Prevented and The Indonesia Connection, that “tax” was avoidable had those with line authority for law enforcement and national security engaged in a timely fashion the facts they were presented. Note what was done instead of following the facts wherever they may lead.

Our website remains under-construction. We had an earlier site, Criminal State, that “disappeared.” The site featured a series of analyses, including documentation of a silencing campaign launched against (Jewish) UC Santa Barbara Professor Bill Robinson. Though widely published, all of those articles also seem to have disappeared from online media sites except this account featured on a small Marin County site. I urge that you feature Bill’s book We Will Not Be Silenced. He’s media savvy and has firsthand experience dealing with those complicit in this treason — who remain at large.

Silencing campaigns are reliably a sign of the treason chronicled in these accounts. Plus the internalization of fear and insecurity. That includes targeting schoolchildren at an early age, as with those who funded the production of Duck & Cover, a 1951 animated film shown by mandatory attendance to U.S. schoolchildren by authority figures (teachers). You may have noticed how we segued seamlessly from the Cold War narrative to The Clash of Civilizations without missing a fiscal beat. The U.S. just agreed to legislation ensuring a single-year $1.5 trillion deficit, including some $700 billion for the military and another $44 billion for Homeland Security. Much of this cost can also be included as we tally the magnitude of this hidden tax.

The “we” in this account includes colleague Mel Rockefeller. His conception in 1951 helped compromise his birthfather’s prospects for the presidency as chronicled in the timeline where you’ll also see the key role played in this treason—still ongoing—by the producer of Duck & Cover.

Today’s equivalent appears to be the serial school massacres in the U.S., typically involving a shooter well known to local and federal law enforcement. The fact that the home of the Parkland, Florida shooter had been visited 39 times and he was repeatedly on the radar of the FBI in a state with a statute (the Baker law) providing for preventive detention raises questions that could usefully be answered if we hope to end the carnage—immediately branded as a Never Again movement.

I was in Washington on 24 March where Miley Cyrus, represented by Mitchell Gossett, performed an inspiring version of The Climb holding a Never Again sign during a performance that was the central pop culture event of the March for Our Lives demonstration that drew an estimated 800,000 to Washington and was televised nationwide.

The research supporting these materials is based on Mel’s firsthand experience profiling those who stalked him his entire life as summarized in the Introduction (linked above). He welcomes engagement by those who would seek to dispute what his life experience proves re the common source of this ongoing treason and the danger it poses to the broader Jewish community.

While in the UK, Mel and I have been closely watching the anti-Semitism narrative dominating UK media coverage, both print and broadcast. We are encouraged by these developments as we’ve long been committed to countering anti-Semitism with facts showing the repetitive behavior patterns of those Mel profiled while being stalked his entire life. That experience remains ongoing while in the UK. As the adage goes, the higher up the tree the baboon climbs, the more his rear end shows. Those profiled are highly exposed.

What we now see emerging by watching UK media is so far over-the-top that we’re confident those most problematic are making themselves apparent, ensuring that accountability at law is only a matter of time. The identical phenomenon is at work in U.S. media.

We’re hopeful that our site will stay intact as a companion form of Media Watch and that it proves useful to you and those copied in realizing the goals we share in combating the scourge of anti-Semitism. We will keep a close eye on your site as we work to expose those responsible for this media-enabled treason. I trust you will do the same as knowledge is power. People simply do not know the who, how and why that we’re now able to prove, largely with facts and analyses pivoting off Mel’s life experience.

Each faith tradition has its extremists. Certainly that’s the case for the evangelical right in the U.S., including the Christian-Zionists. But for an undisclosed bias in media (thus the need for Media Watch), those identified could not have succeeded with the hate-mongering and ongoing war-mongering at the heart of this long-running treason. The who includes those Jewish novelist Hannah Arendt courageously described in 1948 as “Jewish Nazis” and those Albert Einstein described as “fascists” who seek a “Leader State” even as their self-absorption now endangers the entire world.

The common mental state shared by those profiled is captured in the clinical descriptors for psychopathy: superficial charm, pathological lying, egocentricity, lack of remorse, and callousness. The introduction to Guilt By Associationprovides an overview of the modus operandi deployed by the psychopaths and sociopaths whose behavior poses a life-threatening danger to the broader Jewish community.

I’ve copied the general mailbox of Labour Friends of Israel, the Jewish Leadership  Council, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Jewish Voice for Labour, the Jewish Labour Committee, Jewish News and The Jewish Chronicle along with the offices of Jeremy Corbyn, Lord Levy, Stephen Moore (the Parliamentary Chairman of Conservative Friends of Israel), and shadow attorney general Baroness Shami Chakrabarti under whose remit this ongoing treason falls. As knowledge obliges, we are hopeful that all those copied will engage these facts and analyses consistent with their oath or office and with their moral obligation to protect the broader Jewish community from those whose psychopathy has long endangered that community.

As we are unfamiliar with the staffing on this issue, I ask that you forward this email to the appropriate parties in those offices and to others who are sincerely seeking to address this troubling issue. I ask that you kindly copy me so that we can be more effective with this education effort as we work together to expose those who have repeatedly put the Jewish community at peril. Also attached is a June 2017 to the four generals advising Donald Trump (soon to be three).

Mel Rockefeller is copied. Based on what his life experience proves re the common source of this ongoing treason and crimes against humanity, we are optimistic that those responsible can now be identified, indicted and prosecuted consistent with the rule of law. As you will see, he’s been denied access to the rule of law due to those profiled. The law is meant to protect everyone, including those members of the Jewish community who are as yet unaware of the recurring source of anti-Semitism. Thus, again, the key role of education, confirmed facts and factual analysis.

When fully apprised of the facts (vs. what people have been induced to believe is true), we are confident that a global hue and cry will go forth proclaiming Enough is Enough. Those on whom this hidden tax has long been imposed will insist that those complicit in this geo-strategic duplicity are indicted and prosecuted for treason and for the systemic criminality detailed in these materials—aided and abetted by a complicit media.

Never has Never Again been a more relevant rallying cry. Those copied who do not engage consistent with the facts are, by their choice not to engage, aiding and abetting capital crimes.

We look forward to collaborating with you. Thank you for your service.  

Comments on Guilt By Association

How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War

“Explosively revelatory, powerful, compelling.”

—   Ambassador Ed Peck, Deputy Director, Cabinet Task Force on Terrorism, Reagan White House; former Chief of Mission, Baghdad

“Magnificent, timely and persuasive.”

— Paul Findley, Member of Congress 1961-1983 (first member openly removed by the Israel lobby)

“Brilliantly provocative.”

—   Ambassador Andrew Killgore, publisher, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs

“Breathless just reading it.”

—   Noam Chomsky, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

[1]Elliott Abrams, Faith or Fear – How Jews Can Survive in a Christian America(New York: The Free Press, 1997).

[2]Israel Shahak,Jewish History, Jewish Religion(New York: Pluto Press, 1994), p. 8.

[3]See a satirical account of this Zionist venture by Gilad Atzmon, including lyrics and a video from Mel Brook’s “Jews in Space,” see “Jews on the Moon,” July 11, 2018.