Draft of October 4, 2017
by James M. (“Mel”) Rockefeller with Jeff Gates
My life experience proves that the immigration flows fracturing European civil society are purposeful. For a portal into the culture-fracturing implications of what my life experience proves, review on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com my June 2017 memo to the four generals advising President Donald Trump and my December 2016 memos to General John Kelly, now White House Chief of Staff and to Golden State Warriors coach Steve Kerr. Admirers of Donald Trump will soon see him for what he is: a pliable asset of those adept at fracturing civil society to amass more control.
The fixation on Russia as manipulator of the 2016 presidential election revives a Cold War narrative that threatens global security. Former FBI Director Robert Mueller is correct in proceeding with an investigation that treats the problem as organized crime. There is a Russian connection. Those who financially pillaged Russia in the 1990s also influenced the 2016 election. They now seek to divert attention from their role in both frauds with a focus on election meddling by Moscow.
My life experience proves that the common source of the problem is a transnational criminal syndicate composed of agent provocateurs adept at staging serial crises. Those identified often deploy “correspondence” to induce others to step into their narrative. Within hours of President Trump’s September 19, 2017 speech to the U.N. threatening to “totally destroy North Korea,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu argued at the U.N.: “…we’ve all seen how dangerous even a few nuclear weapons can be in the hands of a small rogue regime. Now imagine the danger of hundreds of nuclear weapons in the reins of a vast Iranian empire, with the mission to deliver them anywhere on earth.” The corresponding message, of course, is that we must “totally destroy Iran.”
The best news in months was a report that National Security Adviser Lt. General H.R. McMaster literally “yelled” at a high-level Israeli delegation in late August when they portrayed Iran-backed Hezbollah as a terrorist group. Though pro-Israel groups, including the Zionist Organization of America, seek to remove the general, I’m confident that our true national security apparatus now realizes that my life experience proves that Israel is neither a friend nor an ally but an enemy within. Both Hezbollah and Hamas initially emerged to address the dire living conditions that Zionist extremists imposed on those residing in the region.
Who benefits from war with Iran? Answer: the same parties behind the false intelligence used to induce the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in response to the provocation of 9/11. With game theory predictability, regime change in Iraq provoked (a) the crisis of Islamic extremism, destabilizing the Middle East and North Africa, and (b) the immigration crisis, fracturing Europe. Underlying this probabilistic outcome are those my father, Nelson Rockefeller, described in 1964 as sharing a “tireless genius for crisis.” At the core of this strategy is the creation of a crisis of confidence—in government, in media and in our own judgment, the very foundation of self-governance.
This work refines my father’s observation: this determined foe exhibits a “tireless genius for well-timed crisis.” Their latest crisis includes the appearance of a legitimate presidential election that utilized social networks and Internet search engines—that they dominate—to manipulate freedom of choice, displace true democracy and deceive U.S. voters by “producing” as president a classic asset—an extreme narcissist—who can be induced to lead the U.S. into the next ill-advised war.
Less than 20% of Americans have confidence in government according to the Pew Research Center. A similarly low percentage trusts mainstream media. That’s because those adept at displacing facts with manipulated beliefs (remember Iraqi WMD?) were allowed to gain dominance in media, politics, pop culture, education and think tanks. This systemic duplicity led the U.S. to wage a series of unnecessary and unwinnable wars. Those proficient at making the truth elusive trace to a common source. Anyone who poses a threat by telling the truth risks being targeted.
In April, Red Bull co-founder Dietrich Mateschitz established a nonprofit foundation—Quo Vadis Veritas (Where do you go truth?) with the purpose of launching an independent multimedia investigative journalism platform as a means to support well-informed debate. Condemning the political correctness of “intellectual elites,” he is outspoken in his opposition to “being told what to think, even if one immediately makes himself suspicious in all directions: in America you’re branded a communist, in Europe as a conspiracy theorist or a right-wing populist.” Thus his new media venture (“Closer to the truth”) has a mission to “tell the truth.”
He also expressed concern that mass immigration is causing the “destabilization of Europe.” When critics described his aspirations as dangerous and charged that he was launching an ultra-right-wing media venture, comparing it to Breitbart News, editor-in-Chief Michael Fleischhacker was forced to promptly counter that false correspondence: “Speculation that Quo Vadis Veritas will launch an ideologically motivated platform on behalf of Dietrich Mateschitz is simply wrong.”
Mr. Mateschitz can take it as a compliment that, with his Forbes-reported $21 billion in personal wealth, he is seen as enough of a threat that an attempt was made to preemptively discredit his support for the research required to restore truth to media as a means to enable rational, well-informed debate. Rationality and confirmed facts are what these duplicitous few most fear, including what my life experience proves. That’s why those complicit in this duplicity targeted me financially as chronicled in a timeline on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
From the perspective of systemic risk management, anyone with wealth or political influence should be concerned that they will be targeted by those I profiled while being stalked my entire life. Below I describe how immigration has routinely been deployed to fracture civil society in order to wield more influence and amass more wealth by shaping the narrative in a nonlinear fashion. I’m confident this deception dates to antiquity. An online timeline (1850-2017) chronicles what can be proven by my personal experience.
A problem without a solution remains just a problem. What those I profiled dread is a practical business model solution designed to address the systemic economic dysfunctions that trace to this same source. The “NewRock” solution draws on a hybrid business model that my father devised when, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin America, he was tasked in the post-WWII era with fashioning an alternative to the popularity of communism in developing countries. What NewRock proposes also provides what Pope Francis seeks to counter today’s “savage capitalism” with its “deified markets,” its “globalization of indifference” and its “catastrophic” impact on the environment.
Fracture to Consolidate
Immigration is a tactic used to fracture societies and consolidate power by those with a “tireless genius for crisis.” In modern times, this nonlinear strategy dates to no later than 1948 when (Christian Zionist) President Harry Truman recognized a Zionist enclave as a legitimate state over the objections of General George Marshall, his Secretary of State, the U.S. diplomatic corps, the C.I.A. and the Joint Chiefs who foresaw that this entangled alliance would draw the U.S. into serial conflicts in the region that would undermine our true national interests. What no one yet realized is the lengthy premeditation that preceded this fraud on the American people and on humanity at large.
Dr. Glenn A. Olds met my father at the founding conference of the UN in 1945 in San Francisco and worked closely with him until my father was found dead of an apparent heart attack January 26, 1979. I am confident he was murdered so that this criminal syndicate could come after me due to what my life experience proves. In 1999, Dr. Olds was preparing to meet with U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and others whose identities he could not disclose when he asked, “Mel, we have two questions for you. Did the Jewish elite play a role in ensuring the body count with the Holocaust to secure statehood and did Bill Clinton perpetrate treason when he loaded up his Cabinet with pro-Israelis after his first disastrous two years in office?”
I responded to his first question with a question: “Glenn, without the Holocaust, would Harry Truman have been able to override Secretary of State Marshall and the Joint Chiefs to recognize the Zionist State? I’m sorry but they needed statehood to advance their global agenda. As for Bill Clinton, the man has betrayed himself every day of his life when he puts his pants on not sure on a given day who he is or needs to be for people to like him. That mindset is incapable of knowingly committing treason when he has done more to betray himself every day of his life.”
An adviser to four presidents, two of each U.S. political party, Dr. Olds was asked by Bill Clinton to reorganize his White House staff after his first two disastrous years in office. He refused that request having full knowledge—long before the public knew—where the Clinton presidency was headed. He said, “Mel, I was in my fifties working with Nixon when I went through Watergate with him. I’m too old to deal with the scandals of Bill Clinton.”
Conflicts and Crises
The conflicts that the Joint Chiefs foresaw include the two latest unnecessary and unwinnable wars into which the U.S. was led by (Christian Zionist) President George W. Bush in response to the crisis of 9/11. That ill-advised decision was influenced by false intelligence pre-staged well prior to that murderous provocation. Predictably, those wars catalyzed the immigration flows now fracturing European civil society. Should those complicit succeed in inducing Donald Trump to lead the U.S. to war in Iran and/or Syria, the impact on immigration could be politically explosive as this probabilistic outcome energizes the emergence of a Far Right political movement that eclipses the extreme nationalism of the 1930s that catalyzed WWII.
By their forced removal of more than 700,000 Palestinians and their ongoing brutal occupation, those profiled outraged a refugee population that remains displaced seven decades later as their numbers grew to five million. By forbidding their return, blocking a two-state solution and inducing U.S. support for a 1967 Land Grab (planned since 1951), these agent provocateurs outraged Muslims worldwide and created the plausibility of a seamless segue from the profitable Cold War narrative to the costly Clash of Civilizations as naïve Americans were deceived to view Israel and its powerful lobby as friendly rather than a hostile force operating in plain sight inside our nation. In Palestine and Lebanon, their serial abuse ensured, in response, the emergence of Hamas and Hezbollah, initially as relief organizations to address the desperate needs of local populations.
Without the Holocaust, there would be no Israel. Without Israel’s duplicitous “special relationship” with the dominant Super Power, the U.S. would not have waged immigration-catalyzing wars in the Middle East and North Africa. My life experience proves that this algorithmically-driven duplicity dates to antiquity. With the overthrow of the Sunni-dominant regime in Iraq, Shia-dominant Iraq drew closer to Shia-dominant Iran. With that probabilistic outcome, Sunni royals of the resource-rich Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) allied with Israel (“the enemy of my enemy is my friend”).
This outcome was algorithmically model-able by those deploying their “tireless genius for crisis” to wage probabilistic game theory warfare. The royal families of the GCC are next in line for removal by those who—as my life experience proves—intend region-wide regime change as part of a century-long strategy to control the world’s largest known reserves of oil and gas. Control of that hydrocarbon wealth by (dominantly Jewish) organized crime ensures their control over the future rollout of sustainable energy and solidifies their influence over global financial markets.
The probabilistic fracturing of Iraq dates from May 1916 when British and French diplomats Mark Sykes and Francois Georges-Picot divided the Ottoman Empire into post-WWI spheres of influence without regard for repeated assurances of self-determination and little concern for cultural, ethnic, tribal, religious or linguistic considerations. Syria and Iraq emerged as fragile patchworks of minorities with a tendency to fragment unless held together by a strongman or a powerful central government—providing a plausible pretext for regime change decades later. As Andrew Breitbart noted when founding his rightwing Zionist news outlet: “Politics is downstream of culture.” That lesson was well learned by those such as Trump Chief Strategist Steve Bannon who played a prominent role in producing the Trump presidency—featuring a pop culture personality.
The repetitiveness of this consolidate/fracture pattern masks a long-term geostrategic intent imbedded in the probabilistic math underlying game theory warfare. That math lends history the appearance of evolving naturally rather than being provoked, prodded and manipulated by transnational organized crime. Princeton academic Woodrow Wilson was reelected president in November 1916 on the platform “He kept us out of the war.” Five months later, the U.S. entered WWI after a series of maritime crises. Eight months later, a single phrase in a three-sentence letter to British banker Walter Rothschild from British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour became the “declaration” establishing in Palestine the Zionist enclave known as Israel (aka the “Jewish state”).
Balfour later informed Wilson policy adviser Edward House about Sykes-Picot, a secret agreement that conflicted not only with British pledges of freedom from colonial rule but also with Wilson’s promise of Arab self-determination in a post-war, post-Ottoman Empire world—a war won with the help of Arabs who risked their lives in reliance on that U.S. promise, preemptively discrediting Americans in the Arab world. In his assessment of Sykes-Picot and the Balfour letter, House wrote: “It is all bad and I told Balfour so. They are making it a breeding place for future war.”
That was the goal of Zionism—to ensure that the resource-rich Middle East became a cauldron of conflict and recurring crises that could be manipulated to advance the hegemonic interests of these agent provocateurs with their tireless genius for well-timed crisis. Fast-forward to 1948 and the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs predicted a future foretold by Edward House. General George Marshall knew that granting nation-state recognition to the Zionists was a geostrategic mistake. As Secretary of State, he assured his Zionist Christian boss that, if Truman recognized this enclave of elites and extremists as a legitimate state, he would vote against his Commander-in-Chief. Truman, in turn, was a political product of (Jewish-dominated) organized crime in Kansas City.
With three cultures (Sunni, Shia and Kurd) consolidated by a post-war mandate into a single “state” (Iraq), fracturing was probabilistic. To stabilize today’s fractured Iraq, the U.S. and other nations opposed an October 2nd referendum on Kurdish independence. Working against our interests, Israel emerged as the outspoken supporter of independence. Prior to the invasion of Iraq, Israel had more than 100 Mossad agents operating for a decade in Mosul near the proposed border of Kurdistan. Kurdish leaders intend to take control of the Kirkuk oil fields. Israel is a regular customer.
An independent Kurdistan also provides Tel Aviv an opportunity to stage its crisis-inducing provocations on the Kurdish border with Iran, further destabilizing the region. Turkey is also in their crosshairs based on Kurds living in Turkey and dispersed throughout five countries. Kurdish independence provides a plausible pretext to fracture the entire region while consolidating a new Israel-friendly state behind a veneer of Israel-style “democracy.”
Kurdish nationalism is fronting Israel in the same way that Zionists used the U.S. as a front for waging serial wars while hiding behind the shield of anti-Semitism and protected by a false “special friendship.” Meanwhile pro-Israel Americans commit treason behind a veneer of domestic lobbying as they pressure U.S. lawmakers to wage their wars for Greater Israel. After almost seven decades of systemic deceit and strategic duplicity, their repetitive behavior patterns are becoming apparent.
After branding their apartheid enclave “the only democracy in the Middle East,” Israel assured President George W. Bush that the fracturing of Iraq would spread democracy throughout the Middle East and North Africa. Befriended by Israeli Natan Sharansky, a Russian-Jewish émigré, the Zionist Christian Bush—a known non-reader—endorsed Sharansky’s 2004 book, The Case for Democracy just as the ill-advised invasion of Iraq triggered a probabilistic response—the “crisis of ISIS.”
If a Kurdish state is recognized, Europe will experience a tsunami of refugees fleeing civil war in Turkey. The crisis in Syria alone has displaced more than 12 million people, creating the largest wave of refugees in Europe since World War II resulted in 40 million refugees. Worldwide, the population of refugees and displaced persons now exceeds 60 million.
Two Sides Against the Middle
My life experience proves how so few could wield so much power that money alone never could have provided them. I knew at an early age that, even if I had access to my family’s entire fortune, that wealth could not solve this problem. Unless those complicit are exposed and stopped, they will use rightwing nationalism as a means to suppress free speech as “hate speech” to silence anyone who gets close enough to expose them as serial hate-mongers. Research pivoting off my life experience proves that, since no later than 1850, these war mongers have specialized in pitting “two sides against the middle” while profiting off the misery of both sides.
Those who stalked me to get to my father trace directly to the German-Jewish investment bankers of Hallgarten & Co. who established their U.S. operation in Manhattan in 1850 to finance both sides in a Civil War that risked fracturing the U.S. in its infancy. With their limited repertoire, it comes as no surprise to find their hand at work in the mid-August 2017 confrontation between Black Lives Matter and white-power advocates in Charlottesville, Virginia, the home of Founding Fathers Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The initial demonstration featured a torchlight parade at the University of Virginia, a school that Jefferson founded. Racism has long been a reliable means to fracture civil society, particularly in the U.S. with its history of slavery and roots tracing to a role played by this same trans-generational network.
With increasing transparency, the common source of this geostrategic duplicity is fast becoming obvious along with growing opposition to Israel’s oppressive policies and inhumane behavior. To deter anyone from looking in their direction, policies are being embraced—typically framed as anti-hate legislation—to silence those who can prove how those I profiled abused humanity’s trust.
Meanwhile, a (predominantly Jewish) mainstream media deploys correspondence to portray critics of Israeli policy as critical of Jews and thereby anti-Semites, Jew-haters and Holocaust deniers—a charge that can lead to imprisonment in several European countries. Jewish critics of Israel are dismissed as “self-hating Jews.” Jewish support (financial, editorial, political) for movements within both the left (e.g., Black Lives Matter) and the alt-right (e.g., Breitbart News) helps ensure that those complicit secure more protection, including the use of hate-crime legislation to intimidate opponents, suppress free speech, and criminalize those presenting facts able to prove the (predominantly Jewish) source of this systemic criminality.
By using media to showcase the perceived oppression of a minority (e.g., Blacks), criticism of Israel—by correspondence—can be portrayed as the oppression of Jews as a minority. Meanwhile, attempts remain ongoing to suppress criticism, intimidate critics and escape accountability at law for their crimes against humanity:
- In the 1990s, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) maintained FBI-like dossiers on 16,000-plus Americans that the ADL considered a threat in the San Francisco Bay Area alone. When this operation was discovered, a (Jewish) critic of Israeli policy successfully sued the ADL for invasion of privacy.
- The ADL has since advised the U.S. Congress on the enactment of federal hate crimes legislation and boasts on its website that the ADL “has trained well over 100,000 federal, state, local and military law enforcement officers.”
- With no debate, the California Assembly approved in 2012 a resolution urging that educators crack down on demonstrations against Israel and condemned the suggestion that Jews “wield excessive power over American foreign policy” equating that claim with “anti-Semitism.”
- Convicted of minimizing the role of the Holocaust, a jail sentence for anti-Zionist former Belgian MP Laurent Louis was suspended in September 2017 provided he visit Nazi concentration camps for five years and describe on his blog what he saw and the feelings he experienced.
Critics of Israel face an uphill battle in the U.S. due to the influence wielded by a pro-Israel media and the virtual control that the Israel lobby exerts over both U.S. political parties. For example, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, chair of the 2012 Democratic Party Convention, used a voice vote to amend the party’s platform to state that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. Though his call for a voice vote clearly failed to gain a simple majority—despite three attempts—he declared the amendment agreed-to by the required two-thirds majority.
Earlier, on May 24, 2011, Benjamin Netanyahu spoke to a Joint Session of Congress. By leading 29 standing ovations, more than for President Obama’s State of the Union address, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Jewish Republican, and other pro-Israelis signaled the U.S. Commander-in-Chief to tone down his objections to Israeli settlements—long a reliable source of serial provocations. When “Bibi” returned on March 3, 2015 to oppose Obama’s pending nuclear accord with Iran, he was given 22 standing ovations, including two full minutes of cheering.
No aspect of this duplicity is new. Indeed, its techniques are ancient. For how long have false beliefs been used to displace facts? To make the common source of this deceit apparent requires the “tools of perception” to see this duplicity in real time. The only modern innovation is the technology-enhanced capacity to deceive on a global scale, as with the war in Iraq and, most recently, attempts by their lobby to induce the U.S. to war in Iran and/or Syria. The regime changes brought about by the ‘color revolutions’ and the Arab Spring were not the work of the U.S. but of those skilled at inducing us to wage their wars while undermining our true national interests.
Much of their most recent mischief emanates from the taxpayer-funded ($100 million/year) National Endowment for Democracy led since its founding in 1983 by Carl Gershman who urged in October 2016 that the U.S. “summon the will” to remove Vladimir Putin. Thus the insistence by pro-Israelis that Russia is to blame for the electoral fraud that placed pro-Israel asset Donald Trump in the White House as “our” Commander-in-Chief.
Game Theory Warfare
What GCC royals don’t yet grasp is the duration and depth of the pre-staging by this transnational criminal syndicate, including their lobby in the U.S. Removal of the Shah of Iran set a precedent for what this syndicate intends for royals throughout the MENA region. Early indications include a Saudi-led, Israel-supported rift within the GCC when, with Trump’s support, Qatar was portrayed as a regional Evil Doer in a well-timed GCC crisis joined by the Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt.[17
Bait-and-switch is often used as a geopolitical tool. Soon after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, the rationale for regime change shifted from weapons of mass destruction to the Evil Doer Saddam, a former U.S. ally. Donald Trump’s U.N. speech revealed a similar strategy for inducing war with Iran. With Tehran certifiably in compliance with the 2015 nuclear accord, the narrative shifted to Iran the Evil Doer. On hearing Trump announce that war-mongering narrative, an ecstatic Benjamin Netanyahu gushed: “I never heard a bolder or more courageous speech.”
Trump’s U.N. speech continues the pro-Israel presidential speechwriting tradition seen in January 2002 when, in his first State of the Union address after 9/11, Zionist Christian President George W. Bush described Iraq, Iran and North Korea as the “Axis of Evil” in a speech written by David Frum. Speechwriter Stephen Miller is Donald Trump’s (Jewish) counterpart. Frum and Zionist filmmaker Rob Reiner just joined forces to form the Committee to Investigate Russia featuring neoconservative Iraq War advocate Max Boot and Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute, a primary promoter of the false intelligence that deceived us to wage war in Iraq.
Pre-staging for the Saddam-the-Evil-Doer narrative began no later than 1986 when Tel Aviv launched Operation Trojan Horse. This Mossad operation deployed false intelligence to induce the U.S. to bomb Tripoli and Benghazi. The success of that deceit pre-staged the 2011 regime change in that oil-rich nation. Meanwhile Israeli operatives announced their intent to build up Saddam as an Evil Doer, 25 years prior to the crisis of 9/11 that pre-staged the 2003 regime change in Iraq. Israeli operatives in the U.S. announced their intent to remove Saddam Hussein in 1996 with their publication of A Clean Break—A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.
That mass murder provocation on U.S. soil, in turn, traces to serial provocations dating from 1948. Osama bin Laden conceded that he was radicalized by U.S. support for the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon that left more than 17,000 dead. America’s “special relationship” with the Zionist enclave, dating to 1948, made Americans appear guilty by association. Similarly, the 9/11 Commission Report identified outrage at Israel as the motivation driving Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the so-called “mastermind” of the 9/11 attacks, “KSM’s animus toward the United States stemmed…from his violent disagreement with U.S. foreign policy favoring Israel.”
If those who produced the presidency of asset Donald Trump can induce him to order a war with Iran—and if our military leaders follow that order—that event would fracture not only the region but also Europe with an even greater flood of immigration. Similarly, the October 1st Catalan referendum seeking a separate state for Catalonia risks fracturing Spain and Europe should an independence movement extend elsewhere as groups seek to identify with subsets of national identities while rejecting centralized state governments. Immigration adds fuel to that movement.
To obscure the common source of this manipulation, the narrative is being shifted from anti-Semitism to anti-Islam, a change made apparent in July 2011 with a mass murder by Norwegian Zionist Anders Behring Breivik that killed 69 people, mostly teenagers, plus another eight killed in government buildings in downtown Oslo. His “Zionist manifesto” marks the point when the Evil Doer narrative shifted from anti-communist to anti-Islam as a means to hide the role that Jewish elites and extremists played in the creation and globalization of communism.
That unworkable and inhumane system provided a means—with privatization—to engage in worldwide asset-stripping decades later in the transition from the Marxist consensus to the wealth- and income-concentrating “Washington consensus” undermining democracies and markets worldwide. That probabilistic changeover made the U.S. appear guilty by association as oligarchs became the global norm. That change also pre-staged—with U.S. insistence on the globalization of “our” consensus—the social, financial and fiscal crises emerging to fracture nations worldwide.
How were we persuaded to embrace an economic model that fractures democracies by concentrating wealth and fractures markets by concentrating income? Answer: with “correspondence” as we were persuaded to view financial freedom as proxy for personal freedom and the pursuit of financial returns as a proxy for the pursuit of happiness.
The evidence points to these probabilistic developments as tracing to a 100-year plan imbedded in the math underlying market forces such that we were persuaded to freely embrace the very forces that now threaten our freedom.
 Aaron Bandler, “Report: McMaster Yelled At Israelis Over Their Concerns About Hezbollah,” Daily Wire, September 13, 2017.
 The media use of discrediting “correspondence” is shown in the title of the online article by Hili Perlson in which his comments appear: “Red Bull’s CEO Loves Breitbart. Here’s Why the Art World Should Care,” www.artnet.com, April 24, 2017. Should this truth-telling venture gain traction, watch for the use of “correspondence” to suggest that this well-meaning Austrian entrepreneur’s preference for “homogeneous cultures” reflects a dark sentiment from the 1930s.
 According to Jared Kushner, “All I know about Steve is my experience working with him. He’s an incredible Zionist and loves Israel.” Joel B. Pollak, “Stephen K. Bannon: Friend of the Jewish People, Defender of Israel,” www.breitbart.com November 14, 2016. Mr. Pollak, who describes himself as an “Orthodox Jew,” serves as Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. In mid-August, Steve Bannon left his post as Chief Strategist and returned to his job as executive chairman at Breitbart News.
 Henry Morgenthau, a naturalized German Jew, chaired the finance committee of the Democratic National Committee during Woodrow Wilson’s presidential campaigns of 1912 and 1916. In 1913, the same year that Wilson appointed him U.S. Ambassador to Constantinople, Henry Morgenthau, Jr. acquired a farm near Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Hyde Park, New York estate to emerge as his Treasury Secretary during WWII. In 1914, Morgenthau Senior arranged for Jacob Schiff to raise $50,000 to rescue Jewish settlements in Palestine. Absent this Morgenthau/Schiff alliance: “Palestinian Jewry almost certainly would have perished.” Howard M. Sachar, A History of the Jews in America (New York: Alfred Knoft, 1991), p. 250. Morgenthau led one of several elite Jewish delegations to the 1919 Paris Peace Conference where onerous reparations were imposed and Wilson’s 14 Points were scuttled, including Arab self-determination. That debt burden helped provoke the intense nationalism of the National Socialist German Workers Party (aka the Nazis). In the post-WWII era, Henry Morgenthau, Jr. allied with Milwaukee native Golda Meir to lead the first successful bond drive to finance the Jewish Agency as the precursor to what became the state of Israel. As Prime Minister of Israel, Ms. Meir negotiated a “strategic ambiguity” agreement with President Richard Nixon that enabled Israel’s to become and remain a non-signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty that became effective March 5, 1970. Iran is a signatory.
 The November 2nd letter featured a “declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations” that read: “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”
 British diplomat and intelligence agent Gertrude Bell was active in creating what became the nation of Iraq when the 1921 Cairo Conference set its borders. Critical of the Zionist idea, she dreaded the impact of British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour ceding Palestinian land to Zionists in 1917. Meanwhile the predominantly Jewish Bolshevik leaders turned the Arabs against the British by publishing the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 confirming British and French duplicity in dividing the post-WWI Ottoman Empire in a covert pact between czarist Russia and the British and French colonialists. Bell had met Sir Mark Sykes and knew him to be an anti-Arab racist.
 Tom Lazio represented Kansas City’s Pendergast political machine at the 1929 founding conclave of the National Crime Syndicate in Atlantic City, New Jersey. A Jews-only conclave was convened in the Franconia Hotel in Manhattan in 1931 where the U.S. was divided into exclusive markets centered around 24 major cities with Murder, Inc. established to enforce discipline. Truman was placed in the Senate in January 1935 after a political machine-orchestrated “election” in November 1934. His Senate mentor became Senator James Byrnes, a political product of the Bernard Baruch political machine in South Carolina. See Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008). Truman knew nothing about the U.S. development of atomic bombs until briefed by Secretary of State James Byrnes who was one of Bernard Baruch’s most notable political productions for whom he financed the nation’s first-ever statewide “radio buy” of political ads. Byrnes became a Congressman in 1910, a U.S. Senator in 1930 and then a Roosevelt-appointed Supreme Court Justice before emerging as Secretary of State for Truman during the critical post-war period that pre-staged the geopolitical dynamics of what became the Cold War, a phrase reportedly coined by Baruch and his publicist, Herbert Bayard Swope, who branded Baruch, an adviser to eight presidents, “the park bench diplomat.” The post-WWII “Baruch Plan” for the establishment of an international atomic development authority was so clearly favorable to the U.S. and unfavorable to the Soviet Union that its rejection initiated what became a nuclear arms race that also enabled Israel to develop a nuclear weapons arsenal with which Zionists wield out-sized influence in the region.
 As with his appearance in Libya just prior to the destabilization of that oil-rich nation, French Zionist Bernard-Henri Levy appeared in Erbil, capital of Iraqi Kurdistan, on March 7, 2017 to encourage Kurdish independence citing as a precedent the creation of Israel and comparing the Kurd to Israel as people.
 “By mid-2015, he total number of refugees and internally displaced people had climbed to 60 million people….” Lydia DePillis, Kulwant Saluja and Denise Lu, “A visual guide to 75 years ot major refugee crises around the world,” The Washington Post, December 21, 2015.
 See “Lessons Learned from the Crisis in Charlottesville” on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
 Former California Congressman Pete McCloskey brought the lawsuit against the ADL on behalf of Jeff Blankfort. After successfully targeting Illinois Congressman Paul Findley for removal from Congress in 1982, the Israel lobby targeted in 1984 Pete McCloskey and Illinois Senator Chuck Percy whose daughter, Sharon, is married by my first cousin, former West Virginia Senator John D. (“Jay”) Rockefeller IV, former Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Findley’s successor (Dick Durbin) was handpicked by the Israel lobby. Elected to the Senate in 1996, Durbin now serves as Assistant Democratic Leader in the Senate. The post of Democratic Leader is held by New York’s (Jewish) Senator Chuck Schumer. See Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out (1985).
 Carl Gershman, “Remembering a journalist who was killed for standing up to Putin,” The Washington Post, October 6, 2016. For the regime change sought in Ukraine, George Soros-funded Open Society efforts joined forces with the National Democratic Institute chaired by Madeleine Albright and its Republican counterpart, the International Republican Institute, chaired since 1993 by asset John McCain. Both organizations are taxpayer-financed through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) established during the Reagan era at the urging of C.I.A. Director William Casey. Modeled after the U.S. Foreign Agents Registration Act, a Russian law signed in 2012 requires recipients of foreign political money to register with the government that, in turn, can declare them foreign agents, implying espionage. A law enacted in May 2015 allowed the Russian government to declare the NED undesirable as a “threat to the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation, its defense capabilities and its national security.” Though Gershman suggests that Vladimir Putin faces a “worsening crisis of political legitimacy,” the facts suggest that the NED’s crisis initiation efforts confirm that the war-mongering influence of the expansive Israel lobby inside our government poses a threat to U.S. national security, to world peace, to our habitat and to humanity in general.
 See on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com “The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented” confirming that, had I been engaged in good faith on my return from Baghdad in February 1997, that war would have been unnecessary.
 As my life experience proves, Israeli operations routinely feature multiple objectives. In this case, the bombing of Benghazi pre-staged local conditions that could be provoked—and were—to ensure a September 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate, another well-timed crisis. For a description of Israel’s 1986 operation in Libya, see Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008).
 On April 14, 1986, 160 American, British and German aircraft dropped sixty tons of bombs on Libya, killing 40 civilians. The provocation: an April 5, 1986 terrorist attack on Berlin’s La Belle Discotheque that killed two U.S. servicemen. The pre-staging: in mid-February, the Mossad launched Operation Trojan, a bogus broadcasting psy-op in Tripoli staged to make it appear that the Libyan leadership was transmitting terrorist instructions to their embassies worldwide. In assessing their success with Operation Trojan, a senior Mossad operative was candid: “After the bombing of Libya, our friend Gaddafi is sure to stay out of the picture for some time. Iraq and Saddam Hussein are the next target. We’re starting now to build him up as the big villain. It will take some time, but in the end, there’s no doubt that it’ll work.” Victor Ostrovsky, The Other Side of Deception (New York: HarperCollins, 1994), pp. 113-117. See also Victor Ostrovsky with Claire Hoy, By Way of Deception—The Making and Unmaking of a Mossad Officer (1990).
 Richard Perle, lead author of the report, prepared for Likud Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, co-authored with David Frum An End to Evil (2003). An influential Zionist operative in multiple administrations, Perle chaired the U.S. Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee, 2001-2003,
 Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, in his October 3rd testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, contradicted President Trump on his campaign promise to abandon the Iran nuclear accord, “Absent indications to the contrary, it is something that the president should consider staying with.” Likewise, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Joseph P. Dunford, Jr., confirmed that Iran “is not in material breach” of the agreement. Thomas Gibbons-Neff and David E. Sanger, “Defense Secretary Contradicts President on the Iran Deal,” The New York Times, October 4, 2017.
 See “A Movie about Muhammad: An Idea whose Time Has Come” (February 28, 2012) from the Atlas Shrugs website promoting the market fundamentalist theories of Ayn Rand (né Russian novelist Alyssa Rosenbaum). The site features Zionist hate-monger Anders Behring Breivik who directed a copy of his “manifesto” to Zionist activist Pamela Geller who heads the Muslim-hating American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) that organized opposition to an Islamic Center near the Ground Zero site of 9/11. AFDI posted ads in New York that read: “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.”