by James M. (“Mel”) Rockefeller with Jeff Gates, 23rd March 2017.
NOTE: This lengthy analysis was posted on this site in mid-February 2017 and was quickly “disappeared” by unknown parties. Looking back at this analysis in the post-Charlottesville environment, it seemed for many reasons timely to re-post, including this prediction made six months beforehand (this appears near the end of the analysis):
White House “chief strategist” Steve Bannon was recruited as a campaign strategist from the alt-right Breitbart News where he served as Executive Chairman. His prominent role in the Trump presidency set off charges that he is a white nationalist, a racist and an anti-Semite. That portrayal lays the foundation for manipulating reactions within both the Black Lives Matter movement and among hate-mongering white power advocates.
In truth, Bannon is a political product of the Israeli Right. Andrew Breitbart worked at The Drudge Report and The Huffington Post before his concept for Breitbart News originated—while in Israel—as a media platform that would be unapologetically pro-Zionist. On Breitbart’s death in 2012, he was praised by pro-Israelis Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. Like his former boss, Bannon lavishes praise on extremists among the pro-Israeli Right, including Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Ongoing attempts to portray Bannon as an anti-Semite are misdirection by a predominantly pro-Israel mainstream media. According to Jared Kushner, “All I know about Steve is my experience working with him. He’s an incredible Zionist and loves Israel.”
A shorter version of this analysis appears on the Hidden Tax site under the title: “Donald Trump—The Last President for Greater Israel.”
Radical Islamic extremism is not the true source of the danger we face. The source is those who manipulated our post-WWII sympathy to support an enclave of radical Jewish extremists. In 1948, compassion displaced commonsense when Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann induced Harry Truman, a Zionist Christian president, to ignore George Washington’s insistence that the U.S. avoid “entangled alliances” particularly where—as with the Jewish state—there’s a “passionate attachment.”
Truman’s decision has since enabled these extremists to wage their wars using our blood and treasure. Meanwhile pundits blame presidents rather than those who produced their presidencies. This ill-advised alliance allowed a duplicitous few to undermine democracy as its lobby gained outsized influence in Congress and pro-Israelis became a major force in key opinion-shaping domains, including media, think tanks and popular culture. Through their production of the Trump presidency, these duplicitous few gained virtual control over U.S. foreign policy and the war powers that reside in the Office of the President.
Fear and insecurity have long been deployed by those skillful at shaping decisions by using emotions to displace facts with consensus beliefs. The provocation of 9/11 alone was not enough. To deceive us to wage their war in Iraq also required the pre-staging of false intelligence to ensure that our national narrative segued seamlessly from the Cold War to The Clash of Civilizations. Pro-Israeli elites and extremists now have sufficient sway within the Trump White House that another 9/11 provocation may not be required to induce us to war. Fear alone may suffice.
The parallels are striking. Both George W. Bush and Donald Trump lost the popular vote. As presidents, both rely on advice from pro-Israeli extremists. Both presidencies were produced by pro-Israelis with support from the Zionist Christian Right. Much as Dubya saw his poll numbers tank as he pursued a nonexistent voter ‘mandate,’ support for Donald Trump is also plummeting as he claims a mandate for similarly unpopular policies. Yet whereas Bush was surprised by the 2001 attacks, Team Trump appears to invite and even relish an attack, using every opportunity to invoke radical Islamic extremism. The post-9/11 response saw Bush’s polls soar to 90% approval. Poll numbers typically surge for a war-time president along with the deference he is granted. Yet it is not presidents but those who produce such presidents who are the true beneficiaries.
Today’s fraught conditions required decades of single-issue advocacy by Israel’s expansive lobby—by far the most feared lobby in the U.S. By the Israeli Right’s incitement of hatred against us for their treatment of Palestinians, we became a casualty of classic agent provocateur behavior meant to outrage Muslims and endanger our interests—first in the Middle East and now worldwide. Yet critics of Israeli incitement and hate-mongering risk indictment as anti-Semites under federal hate crimes legislation. Where was radical Islamic extremism prior to 1948? Where was it prior to their provocative Land Grab of June 1967 (aka the Six-Day War).
The consistency of the fact patterns—over decades—confirms that Jewish extremists (aka Zionists) routinely stage crises that foment fear, insecurity and hatred to advance their geopolitical goals. The Joint Chiefs warned Truman in 1948 about the fanaticism and treachery of those whose true goals remained unrevealed. They were correct. Zionists seek dominance in that resource-rich region and mean to use us to achieve it. They’re willing to deceive us, con other nations and betray the broader Jewish community to achieve what they now hope to accomplish through the Trump presidency.
Empowering the Provocateurs
Rather than constrain these extremists, we enabled them. Rather than force their registration as foreign agents, we allowed them to operate freely with neither monitoring nor constraint. Regardless of their conduct, we provided Zionists with a ‘qualitative edge’ in arms and munitions because they live in a dangerous neighborhood made far more dangerous by decades of provocative conduct. With our misplaced trust, we allowed them access to the very intelligence with which they put at risk our national security. Contrary to the perception abroad, the U.S. government is not the problem; the problem lies with those who deceived, weakened and discredited us.
By granting Israel the status of a “special relationship,” we welcomed a Trojan horse inside our government. Making us appear even more guilty by our association with these elites and extremists, we also provided diplomatic cover in the U.N. shielding the Jewish state from accountability to international norms—regardless of their behavior. With the benefit of 69 years of hindsight, it’s difficult to imagine a formula better devised to generate hatred for us—orchestrated by those skilled at hate mongering. Meanwhile their operations remain obscured with claims that they need protection from Jew haters even as those complicit also deceive the broader Jewish community by manipulating their identity—as Jews—to lend tacit support to Zionist extremism.
Those skilled at displacing facts with false beliefs (e.g., Iraqi WMD) took decades to enlist the unwavering support of evangelical Christians who believe their messiah will not return until Jews recover their promised land. Ronald Reagan mobilized them. The campaign of Born Again George Bush targeted them as a voting bloc. Those who produced the Trump presidency reached them with online psychographic profiling and targeted messaging that played to their beliefs, including their unquestioning support of “the Israelites.”
Much as those advising Bush deceived us to wage an unnecessary war in Iraq, those Jewish extremists advising Trump exaggerate the threat of Islamic extremism—while simultaneously promoting policies certain to provoke extremism. The mass murder of 9/11 transformed U.S. politics in an instant as that emotionally wrenching provocation enabled, in response, the creation of a consensus shaped around hate-mongering and war-mongering. With the U.S. military now under the command of an insecure and reactive personality, the political environment conducive to such “reflexive control” is again primed for war awaiting only a plausible rationale.
Provocation Alert: On April 14, 2004, Zionist Christian Republican George W. Bush provided written assurances of U.S. support to rightwing Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. That letter was certain to provoke violence—and did. On February 15, 2017, Donald Trump is scheduled to meet with rightwing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. More provocative assurances are all but assured crafted by Hasidic extremists from the Chabad Lubavitch sect: son-in-law Jared Kushner, chief international negotiator Jason Greenblatt and David Friedman, a long-time supporter of Israeli settlements, nominated as Trump’s ambassador to Israel.
Advised by right wingers among (predominantly Jewish) neoconservatives, Dubya made a statement that ceded Palestinian land to Jewish extremists (“new realities on the ground”), foreclosed a “right of return” by dispossessed Palestinian refugees, and promised the U.S. would block any attempt by the U.N. to hold Israel accountable under international law (“prevent any attempt by anyone to impose any other plan.”). In classic agent provocateur fashion, that White House statement in support of Jewish extremists triggered riots and terrorist attacks throughout the Islamic world and provided a rationale for more oppressive measures by Israel against their Muslim neighbors.
The advice offered Trump by his trusted inner circle of messianic Chabad extremists can already be seen, including statements insulting Iran and an increase in sanctions when Tehran tested a missile even though the test was authorized by the terms of the nuclear accord. The elites and extremists who have long lied to us to pursue their agenda for Greater Israel are now deeply imbedded in a U.S. administration.
A Rising Tide of Knowledge
The 9/11 attacks occurred three days after the end of the Durban World Conference Against Racism, eclipsing any mention of the conference, including the claim that Arab nations sought to equate Zionism with racism. The radical Jewish extremists of the Zionist state knew they risked being shut down by the international community. That mass murder on U.S. soil shifted the narrative to radical Islamic extremism, pre-staging the hate-mongering narrative that extremist Muslims are the problem. A former Director of the C.I.A. reports that 9/11 required ten years to plan and execute and necessitated a nation state with stable intelligence operations inside the U.S. Only one nation had the means, motive and opportunity. That state has yet to be identified.
With Zionification of the foreign policy platform of both major political parties, the U.S. moved steadily to the geopolitical right as trillions of dollars were squandered on an unnecessary and unwinnable war in Iraq for Greater Israel. Donald Trump has since emerged as the face of Zionist extremism. Those who cast him for this role seek to induce us to wage another war—while amassing steadily more control over the Congress, the Executive Branch and the Judiciary.
With transparency, those betrayed by our entangled alliance with Israel will grasp how this happened, identify who, and compute the costs of a lengthy fraud enabled by a false friendship. Those responsible for enabling this treachery are our leaders—both civilian and military—who knew about this duplicity yet allowed those complicit to operate with legal impunity, often while accepting contributions to their political campaigns or support from their political action committees.
Following the December 23rd U.N. censure of Israel for its settlements, pro-Israel critics claimed that President Obama betrayed Israel. Yet he vetoed a similar resolution in 2011 and—throughout his presidency—shielded Israel from censure in the U.N. even as its leaders lied to us and repeatedly made promises they never meant to keep, a consistent pattern of behavior dating from 1948. In truth, Israel betrayed the U.S. The self-absorbed Donald Trump is the latest pliable ‘asset’ of those who have long manipulated the U.S. to impose their hidden tax on humanity.
Glenn Olds advised both my father and me. After Glenn and I worked together for several years, he asked me two questions just prior to leaving for a meeting that included U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan and Maurice Strong who convened the first Earth Summit in 1992 in Rio de Janeiro. In preparation for their meeting, Glenn asked, “Mel, did the Jewish elite have a hand in the Holocaust and did Bill Clinton commit treason when he loaded up his Cabinet with Jews?” I responded:
Glenn, without the Holocaust, could Truman have recognized the Jewish state over the strong objections of his Secretary of State George Marshall and our Joint Chiefs who warned Truman that what has since happened in the region would, in fact, happen and is now a matter of record? I’m sorry but this is how bad this really is—and worse. As for Bill Clinton, he could never betray our nation. He has betrayed himself every day he gets up and puts his pants on. The man has never had a real sense of who he is—only what he needs to be for people to like him.
< ——- >
Draft of February 8, 2017
Word count: 11,357
Donald Trump—The Last President for Greater Israel
Pro-Israelis produced the Trump presidency. Were that not the case, the Trump transition team would not have been dominated by rightwing pro-Israelis.
As proven by my life experience as the son of Nelson Rockefeller (unknown except to a select few), Jewish elites and extremists are the source of serial wars and crises dating to no later than 1850 when Rothschild-affiliate Hallgarten & Company investment bankers opened their Manhattan office to finance both sides in the Civil War. A century later, my Uncle David Rockefeller razed Hallgarten’s headquarters to build One Chase Manhattan Plaza. He also personally allied with these German-Jewish bankers from the same Hesse region as Leo Strauss, a mentor to those who devastated our national security by deceiving us to invade Iraq, setting in motion the emergence of ISIS/ISIL. With the unlimited war powers now vested in the president, the elites and extremists who produced this presidency pose a threat not only to our national security but also to world peace.
Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, raised in an Orthodox Jewish home, may be the Eddie Jacobson of the Trump Presidency. After serving together in the same artillery unit during WWI, Jacobson and Harry Truman returned to Kansas City to open a haberdashery that soon failed. That’s when the Pendergast component of organized crime began the production of Truman’s political career. After the National Crime Syndicate was formed in 1929, Truman was “elected” to the Senate in 1934 where his career was groomed to ensure he became president on the death of President Franklin Roosevelt in April 1945. Truman and Roosevelt had spoken only twice prior to that fateful day.
Three years later, Zionist Chaim Weizmann appealed to Jacobson’s Jewish identity to set a meeting with Truman. After assuring Truman that the Zionist state would not become the extremist enclave that it became, Weizmann induced this Zionist Christian President to recognize as a legitimate state an enclave of Jewish elites and extremists—over the strong objections of his Secretary of State George Marshall, the diplomatic corps, the C.I.A. and the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs who feared that Zionists would draw the U.S. into serial conflicts in the region—as they did. Such is Kushner’s insider influence that Trump transition officials instructed the Obama White House that foreign policy issues should be relayed to the President-elect through his son-in-law.
Our First Social Media “Election”
Jared Kushner oversaw the campaign’s digital and social media strategies along with campaign strategist Steve Bannon, since named senior White House strategist. In the 2016 presidential primaries, New York hedge fund manager Robert Mercer singlehandedly funded the campaign of Texas Senator Ted Cruz, an outspoken Zionist Christian advocate for Israel. When the Cruz campaign collapsed, Mercer shifted his support to Trump and to funding Cambridge Analytica, specialists in data mining and psychographic analysis as key to voter targeting.
In the U.K., Cambridge Analytics (CA) identified and targeted “persuadable” voters to win a June 2015 referendum for those who sought to see Britain exit the European Union (Brexit). As with Trump, Brexit supporters declared the vote a “populist victory.” In the U.S., CA Chief Executive Alexander Nix boasts, “We have a massive database of 4-5,000 data points on every adult in America….we model the personality of every adult across the United States, some 230 million people.” Drawing on troves of online data, Facebook “likes” and smartphone data, CA devised an individual psychological targeting system able to influence elections.
In 2014, CA was involved in 44 federal and state-level elections and 50 in 2016, all of them Republican. Those campaigns include the election of Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton, an outspoken critic of the nuclear accord with Iran and an Israel loyalist. When Ted Cruz won the 2016 Iowa presidential caucuses, CA and its Mercer-funded “behavioral microtargeting” was credited with the win. CA has such confidence in its profiling system that it claims a capacity to detect aspects of a voter’s personality not even known to the voter. This use of Big Data provided the Trump campaign with a far more robust ‘read’ of voters, particularly in critical swing states just prior to the election.
Its data mining also relies on “onboarding”—the widely prevalent self-profiling undertaken voluntarily online, much of it on Facebook, plus consumer behavior reflected in Internet use (much of it on Google), online CA surveys and other sources, both public and private, largely without users’ permission or knowledge. The use and abuse of these privately owned public spaces (aka “POPS”) has transformed Facebook and Google into the “Private Superpowers” of the Information Age. Knowledge about social media users can be gleaned, assessed and, in effect, deployed as a form of psy-ops weaponry to shape decision-making by those profiled and targeted—without their knowledge—by ensuring that they (and only they) receive messages about issues they care about.
By harvesting information on where you live, shop, communicate, travel and so forth, those data points can be extrapolated backwards by psychographic microtargeters to create messages and devise algorithms able to segment voter audiences so that political advertisements can be sent online as “dark posts” seen by no one but those targeted. Thus, for instance, this individual psychological targeting selected Black voters in key electoral states to receive reminders that Hillary Clinton used “super predator” language offensive to Blacks, encouraging them not to vote.
Online personality data informs both the content and tone of the messages sent, providing an “actionable view” of persuadable voting blocs that can be “flipped” in key electoral states. Instead of betting on broadcast media, this Mercer-funded, Mercer-advised, Mercer-coordinated campaign invested in narrowcast digital messaging, especially Facebook-enabled microtargeting. Relying largely on traditional media, Clinton outspent Trump an estimated 3:1 on broad-brush messaging.
The Mercers are described as a financial “patron saint” of the Bannon-run Breitbart News. They also funded (and largely control) Cambridge Analytica. With Bannon on the board, the firm was retained by the Trump campaign that, in turn, was supported by Mercer who also funded the Bannon-founded Government Accountability Institute, a nonprofit (with Rebekah Mercer a board member) that published Clinton Cash. That book led the F.B.I. to reopen (and re-close) its email investigation during the last two weeks of the Clinton campaign. The Mercer Family Foundation also gave at least $3.5 million to the nonprofit Citizens United that sued to force the release of Clinton’s emails.
Following his “election,” Trump changed his position on at least a half-dozen issues that motivated those microtargeted to vote for him. The point, however, is not which issues he abandoned but those he did not, including unflinching support for Israel, opposition to the nuclear accord with Iran, relocating the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem (albeit deferred), and support for expanding Israeli settlements in the occupied territories—a Greater Israel stance certain to negate any possibility of a two-state solution.
Pre-staging The Trump “Election”
Pro-Israel extremists inside the Trump Organization include general counsel Jason Greenblatt (a former settler), bankruptcy attorney David M. Friedman (a two-state proponent and pro-settler), special counsel Michael Cohen and key family members, including son-in-law Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump who converted to Orthodox Judaism. Israeli settlers were heartened by a post-election interview that Greenblatt (described as a “foreign policy adviser”) gave to Israel’s Army Radio when he said Trump did not see settlements as “an obstacle for peace.” That statement led to several celebratory announcements in Israel proclaiming, “the era of the Palestinian state is over.”
Greenblatt lived in a settlement in Israel and wrote about serving as a sentry. In April 2016, Trump said he may appoint Greenblatt, his chief lawyer, as Middle East envoy. He also identified Kushner as playing a central role in dealing with Israel, saying he could help “do peace in the Middle East.” Kushner is a real estate developer and Greenblatt a real estate attorney. Neither have diplomatic experience. Nor does Friedman who Trump named Ambassador to Israel with Greenblatt named Trump’s negotiator for international affairs. Friedman, who called President Obama an anti-Semite, wrote that he looked forward to moving the U.S. embassy to “Israel’s eternal capital, Jerusalem.”
Based on my life experience profiling those identified, I am confident that those complicit know they’ve overstepped and are now worried about exposure. Overzealous statements reflect not only arrogance (confirming their insecurity) but also fear. Thus, for example, David Friedman described moderate and liberal Jews, including Jewish supporters of a two-state solution, as “worse than the kapos,” the Jews put in charge of Nazi concentration camps. Friedman urges that Israel annex the West Bank, a long contested area that he refers to as Judea and Samara and part of Greater Israel.
Following the December 15, 2016 announcement of his appointment, Friedman conceded that he and Trump negotiated that sensitive diplomatic position “months earlier.” The timing suggests that the deal Trump struck with Friedman and Greenblatt coincided with the period between the June 20, 2016 firing of campaign manager Corey Lewandowski and the August 19, 2016 resignation of campaign manager Paul Manafort—as Trump plummeted in the polls—and the hiring of Mercer-funded Cambridge Analytica along with strategist Steven Bannon and manager Kellyanne Conway. Her polling firm, Make America Number 1, was paid more than $950,000 while she transitioned from the Mercer-funded campaign of Zionist Christian Ted Cruz to the Mercer-supported Trump campaign dominated by rightwing pro-Israelis with Kushner serving as de facto campaign manager.
Following the Electoral College win, Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer repeatedly visited the transition team at Trump Tower in Manhattan. An American who forfeited his U.S. citizenship to serve Israel, Dermer also serves as a Trump intermediary for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and casino owner Sheldon Adelson. In support of the Israeli Right, Adelson spends a reported $50 million per year publishing for free Israel’s largest circulation newspaper (Israel Today).
Why Aren’t They Registered as Foreign Agents?
Boasting that he is “the richest Jew in the world,” the casino mogul convened the “Adelson primary” in his Las Vegas hotel and casino where many of the 17 candidates then vying for the Republican presidential nomination appeared in the hope of gaining the $20 million he provided former House Speaker Newt Gingrich in support of that Zionist Christian’s 2012 presidential bid. When Gingrich withdrew from the race, Adelson gave a reported $30 million to support the campaign of Zionist Mormon Mitt Romney. He invested an estimated $100 million in opposing Barack Obama’s reelection in 2012—roughly three-tenths of one percent of his Forbes-reported $30 billion fortune.
In collaboration with senior Republican leaders of both the House and Senate, Dermer arranged to secretly invite Netanyahu to deliver a nationally televised speech on March 3, 2015 to a joint meeting of Congress in opposition to President Obama’s ongoing negotiations on the Iran nuclear accord. In one of the most fawning of many comments directed at Adelson’s purse, Zionist Christian presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued that the negotiations “will take the Israelis and march them to the door of the oven.” On the campaign trail, Trump mocked the accord as “disastrous,” a theme that Friedman echoed when announcing his nomination as ambassador.
Six days after Netanyahu’s speech to Congress, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton also sought to undermine negotiations by releasing a letter to the Iranian leader signed by 47 Republican Senators implying that any Obama-negotiated accord could be undone by the Senate or the next president. The role played by Israel and its lobby was apparent but nontransparent and, as usual, went largely unmentioned by a pro-Israel mainstream media.
Those skeptical that a 37-year old freshman Senator would take this step on his own initiative had good reason to worry. Our National Security Agency (NSA) overheard Netanyahu conferring with Cotton. President Obama ordered the NSA to monitor Netanyahu and his aides when they and the Israel lobby sought to scuttle the Iran accord meant to prevent a war with Iran that has long been sought by supporters of Greater Israel. Cotton’s campaign received more than $2 million in support from pro-Israeli groups and individuals. No single incident was enough to indict anyone for espionage or treason. Again, the Mercer influence was apparent in the contribution of more than $1 million to the Club for Growth Action, a Super PAC that financially backed Cotton.
The Emergency Committee for Israel, led by neoconservative William Kristol, invested $960,250 in last-minute ads supporting Cotton’s 2014 Senate campaign. Kristol is co-founder of the Project for a New American Century established in 1997 to lobby for regime change in Iraq. Paul Singer, a New York hedge fund billionaire and supporter (along with Sheldon Adelson) of Birthright Israel, invested $250,000 in the production of Cotton’s political career. Seth Klarman, a Boston-based pro-Israeli billionaire, contributed $100,000. At least $825,000 was invested in Cotton by a political action committee run by former Bush-era U.N. Ambassador and bombastic neocon John Bolton, a reliable advocate for policies favoring Greater Israel.
The Bolton PAC is financed largely by Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah and by Irving and Cherna Moskowitz of Miami who for years have supported settlements meant to create a Jewish majority in Arab neighborhoods. Bolton appeared on President-elect Trump’s short list for Secretary of State; Cotton was identified as an early favorite for Secretary of Defense.
Cotton’s rapid rise to political prominence traces to the same rightwing pro-Israelis who fund the hawkish Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) chaired by Adelson with Paul Singer a director. The Adelsons advocated a first-strike nuclear attack on Iran to signal “our” seriousness about the Iranian nuclear program. They also gave $5.1 million to the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a neocon/Greater Israel think tank. In 2016, Shelly and Mariam Adelson focused their political investments on Congressional and Senate campaigns to shore up the Zionification of the Republican Party confident that the Democratic Party has long been reliably supportive of Tel Aviv. This influence is not limited to the U.S. For example, a counterpart lobby has long been active in the creation (and removal) of Members of Parliament—of both parties.
In 2012, Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer broke with long-standing diplomatic protocol to campaign in Florida for Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential candidate, an opponent of the Iran deal and, importantly, a Mormon. Also known as the Lost Tribe of Israel, youth in this uniquely American version of Zionism are routinely recruited for employment in the F.B.I. and our intelligence services, an issue to which I will return.
By stirring up the settlements issue, the Trump-enabled Israeli Right may well ignite another war-catalyzing intifada reminiscent of the Ariel Sharon-led march to the Al Aqsa Mosque (aka the Temple Mount) in September 2000. That provocative armed march triggered the Second (Al Aqsa) Intifada one year prior to the mass murder provocation of 9/11 that served as a rationale for the regime change sought in Iraq for Greater Israel. Sharon organized that march after helping ensure the failure of international negotiations on a proposal to designate Jerusalem an international city protected for use by adherents of all three faiths that consider the ancient city sacred.
Purposefully aggravating the settlements issue is consistent with the influence wielded within the Republican Party by Sheldon Adelson. He and his equally rightwing Israeli wife ensured removal from the Republican Party platform of any mention of the two-state solution. The Democrats saw a similar scouring of their platform to delete any mention of the term “occupied territories.” The Adelsons earned aisle-row seats at the inauguration, ensuring theirs were the first faces Trump saw when he stepped onto the inaugural platform to take his oath of office.
Zionification of the foreign policy platform of both parties began in earnest soon after Ronald Reagan came to Washington in January 1981. In 1979, televangelist Jim Bakker featured Reagan on his nationally televised show where he promised to deliver 50 million Christian Zionist voters to the former California Governor in his bid for the presidency. As a group, white evangelicals make up one-fifth of all registered voters and about one-third of voters who lean toward the Republican. Party. When those who produced the George W. Bush presidency targeted evangelical voters in 2004, they chose him by a margin of 78-21 percent. In 2016, Trump campaign microtargeters won the evangelical vote by 80-16 percent.
Christian Zionist President Jimmy Carter paved the way for Reagan when, in 1978, he supported a joint resolution of the Congress (first passed in 1975) proclaiming “Education Day U.S.A.” in honor of Chabad Lubavitch Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, a tradition continued by Reagan. Considered a messiah by some among his ultra-orthodox followers, Schneerson led a fundamentalist sect of Hasidic Judaism supportive of the Israeli Right and the settler movement (he died in 1994). Founded in the late 1700s and based in the Polish-Russian town of Lubavitch, Chabad’s messianic evangelism includes a strain of narrow ethno-centrism seen among Jewish settlers that fuels movements to equate Zionism with racism and depict Israel as an apartheid state.
Three days prior to November 8, 2016 election, Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump visited the grave of Rabbi Schneerson accompanied by Trump Organization lawyer Jason Greenblatt. Between 2003 and 2013, the Kushner family foundation donated $342,5000 to various Chabad institutions and projects, including support for one of the oldest settlements in the West Bank. In the course of purchasing a $5.5 million home in Washington’s Kalorama neighborhood, Washington’s latest power couple also joined TheSHUL, a Chabad congregation just a 10-minute walk from their home.
The politicization of the Christian Right gained momentum when evangelical voters again were targeted by those who produced the presidency of George W. Bush, a Born Again Zionist Christian. Evangelical support increased in the post-9/11 environment of fear and insecurity, an emotional undercurrent also tapped by those who designed the microtargeted messaging that won the Electoral College vote for Donald Trump. The electoral test-run dates to 2014 when Cambridge Analytica urged that North Carolina Senate candidate Thom Tillis shift his message from education policy to charges that incumbent Kay Hagan failed to take the rise of ISIS seriously. Insecurity sells. Tillis won.
Meanwhile, the Israeli Right continued their nonstop incitement campaign. For example, the Knesset advanced legislation in November 2016 allowing settlers to gain title to privately owned Palestinian land on which Jewish settlers illegally built, depriving them of their right to contest a forced sale. Tel Aviv has long benefitted politically from the violence provoked by an oppressive multi-decade occupation. With their deployment of simultaneous provocations, multiple goals are routinely pursued at the same time. As Vermont Senator Pat Leahy summarized:
“One of the most effective ways that ISIS and other terrorist groups have attracted recruits is by tarring the United States with Israel’s expanding occupation of the West Bank. This legislation to retroactively legalize illegal settlements will be welcomed by those murderous groups as further evidence that America’s closest ally in the region is bent on destroying a peaceful solution, including the possibility of a Palestinian state.”
This steady march to the political right both in Israel and the U.S. helped persuade President Obama to allow the U.N. passage on December 23, 2016 of a resolution declaring that the establishment of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967 “has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace.” In effect, the resolution casts Israel as a criminal state operating well outside the norms of the rule of law.
The 14-0 vote, with the U.S. abstaining, ensures that the resolution will be impossible to rescind because at least one of the other four states with veto power will object. At the urging of his Greater Israel advisers, Donald Trump signaled the Israeli Right that help was on the way and that U.S. support of the U.N. would be revisited. Egged on by those he trusts, he reinforced the fanaticism, arrogance and aggressiveness of Jewish extremists and further emboldened their use of provocations certain to further inflame tensions and trigger violence by “radical Islamic extremists.”
Meanwhile, we’ll see a weekly parade of the Orthodox Jewish power couple of Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump walking to a Chabad synagogue accompanied by a Secret Service contingent. In time, those walks will feature a series of pro-Israel celebrities, further branding the U.S. in publications worldwide as standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the Israeli Right, including extremists of the settler movement supported by Kushner, Friedman, Greenblatt & Co. Those photos will portray the U.S. as guilty by association. By choosing a Chabad venue for their synagogue, the Kushner/Trump family identified Americans—and the nation’s capital—with the most extreme of the Jewish extremists. That associative impression will be reinforced by a series of White House-sponsored parties featuring the music and dancing associated with Jewish celebrations as the Israeli Right confirms for the world their ascendancy within “our” government.
Election By Way of Deception
Taking full advantage of the new media ecosystem offered by the Private Superpowers of social media, the Trump campaign was the primary beneficiary of an onslaught of fake news as one in five social-media users modified their views about a political or social issue due to a social media post, according to a Pew Research survey published in October 2016. Almost half of Americans now rely on Facebook as a source of news. According to BuzzFeed, among the 20 most popular fake election stories that generated the most audience engagement on Facebook in the last three months of the campaign, all but three were either pro-Trump or anti-Hillary.
During that period, the top-performing fictitious election stories on Facebook generated more engagement than the top 20 stories by established media outlets, including the The New York Times, The Washington Post and NBC News. The fact-displacing, opinion-shaping capacity of social media was deployed with great success by digital strategists Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon in the service of those notorious for waging war by way of deception—the operating motto of the Israeli intelligence services. According to Cambridge Analytics where Bannon serves as a director, the recipe for profiling and persuading voters is now like “baking a cake.”
It was not informed choice but psychographic microtargeting that enabled the Trump campaign to prevail in key electoral states. Victory went to the campaign best able to (a) identify persuadable voters, and (b) support its online-harvested “data points” with appealing psychographics. Facebook emerged as “the micro-targeter’s ultimate weapon” in providing access to personal data and crafting effective messaging.
It’s long been known that algorithms determine what Facebook editors consider “news” which, in turn, is weighted for whatever is flagged as “liked” by networks of online friends who, in turn, can be identified and targeted. Contrary to the post-election comment by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook is not a “platform for public discourse” where people can be informed with facts. Its purpose is to drive traffic (attention spans) to a platform where Facebook can sell advertising and monetize the “clicks” of those lured to their platform.
Facts are only incidental. Facts are bypassed with algorithm-derived messaging that targets voters’ profiled feelings (likes and dislikes), enabling the displacement of facts, rational arguments and even informed choice. Psychologist and game theory Nobel laureate economist Daniel Kahneman provides in Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011) a roadmap to detect and target personal biases easily retrieved from the online self-profiling (“onboarding”) provided by unwitting Internet users.
Though this Facebook-enabled duplicity was well known for at least two years, only after this Greater Israel victory did Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg concede a need to address the problem. On the 15th anniversary of 9/11 (seven weeks prior to the November 8 election), Facebook’s ‘trending’ algorithms directed its 1.8 billion users to a “9/11 Truther” conspiracy theory claiming that the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks. The next day it was announced that Facebook and Israel agreed to work together to rein in content that Israel says incites violence.
By tweaking its algorithms to reduce “click bait,” it’s long been known that Facebook editors can put a political campaign out of business. Or promote a campaign that Facebook favors. Analysts have since confirmed that much of the fake news was targeted at Facebook users in swing states such as Florida and Ohio, benefitting the Trump campaign. Exposure of its role in the 2016 election will provide Facebook with the excuse it needs to censor online content—such as this analysis—that exposes the shared pro-Israeli bias of those using this social media platform to “win an election”—by way of deception.
The Next (Israeli) Narrative
Post-election, those who produced the Trump presidency assembled a transition team, aided by a corps of pro-Israeli advisers to the Trump Organization. His campaign advisers include General Keith Kellogg who served as chief operating officer for the Coalition Provisional Authority that governed Iraq following the 2003 invasion. It was on his watch that U.S. Ambassador Paul Bremer disbanded the Sunni-dominant Republican Guard that became ISIL. No one knows how much of the 363 tons of U.S. currency flown into a war zone on his watch found its way to ISIL.
When Trump named Kansas Congressman Mike Pompeo, a critic of the Iran accord, as his choice for Director of the C.I.A., the Republican Jewish Coalition (chaired by casino multi-billionaire Sheldon Adelson) described him as a “wonderful choice” and a “true friend of Israel.” When Mitt Romney made Trump’s short list as a potential Secretary of State, the war-with-Iran agenda came sharply back into focus. A lay bishop in the Mormon Church, a Romney presidency would by now have likely led the U.S. into Israel’s long-sought war with Iran.
During Romney’s 2012 campaign, foreign policy adviser Dan Senor assured journalists that if Israel launched a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, Romney “would respect the move.” Regardless of their personal differences (Romney called Trump a “phony” and a “fraud”), Romney’s hardline position on Iran qualified him for consideration as Secretary of State for a Greater Israel presidency. That top foreign policy post instead went to Rex Tillerson, CEO of ExxonMobil, a firm founded by my great-grandfathers.
Had Romney been included in a Trump administration, Donald Trump would have been seen as magnanimous and Romney’s role would have been portrayed as unifying the party. In truth, it would have confirmed that Zionists consolidated their power in a presidency produced to take us to war in Iran for Greater Israel. Placing a Mormon bishop in that high profile position would have made the Greater Israel agenda too obvious.
The Next Cold War
Those promoting the narrative of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election fail to mention that Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer campaigned for Romney in 2012 or that Netanyahu was featured in a Romney campaign ad in Florida warning of the Iranian threat. Evidence of Israeli influence may stall any Senate investigation of the purported hacking of our election at the direction of Vladimir Putin. As yet, Americans are unaware that Russian Jews compose the hardcore center of the Likud Party led by Netanyahu with Russian Avigdor Lieberman his Deputy Prime Minister, then Foreign Minister and now Defense Minister. By appointing as “our” ambassador and negotiator ultra-right pro-Israelis Friedman and Greenblatt, Trump pushed Netanyahu further to the Right.
The Israeli Right had the means, motive and opportunity to make it appear that Russia was behind the cyber-attacks. With Russian Jews a dominant voting bloc in the Israeli Right, it’s possible they made it appear that Putin is the problem. My life experience suggests that the discrediting of American democracy traces not to Putin nor even to Trump but to the U.S. Israel-relationship that enabled their production this quick-tempered asset as “our” Commander-in-Chief.
Romney adviser Dan Senor hailed Dan Pompeo as a “superb pick” to lead our premier intelligence agency (Mitt Romney’s July 2012 trip to Israel was described as the “brainchild” of Senor and Dermer). As spokesperson for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad and senior adviser to Administrator Paul Bremer, Senor put a positive spin on the disastrous post-invasion policies that devastated Iraq and pre-staged conditions that led to the emergence of ISIL/ISIS. During his tenure in Iraq, the (Jewish neocon) Senor advanced not U.S. interests but the interests of those working for Greater Israel.
The Trump “election” confirms that Jewish elites and extremists have amassed enough control to pick presidential advisers able to shape U.S. foreign policy for the next fifty years. Lt. General Michael Flynn, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, was quickly announced as Trump’s choice for National Security Adviser. After the attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya in 2012, Flynn repeatedly pressed his intelligence officers to find a link to Iran—in much the same way that Vice President Dick Cheney and Lewis Libby, his (Jewish neocon) chief of staff, pressed C.I.A. officers to find a 9/11 link to Iraq. In neither case was there a link.
In July 2016, just as the GOP nominating convention convened in Cleveland, Flynn published The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and Its Allies co-authored by (Jewish neocon) Michael Ledeen. The book named China is one of the nations in a “working coalition” allied with “radical Islamists and regimes in Havana, Pyongyang, Moscow and Beijing.” The book’s well-timed release foreshadowed a post-election victory call to President-elect Trump from Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen. That call unsettled almost four decades of a One China policy, ignited foreseeable tensions in U.S.-China relations, and pre-staged a potential crisis in the Pacific region early in the Trump presidency.
The foreword to the Flynn/Ledeen book features former Senator Joseph Lieberman, a self-described Jewish Zionist, who—along with Senator John McCain—marketed the false intelligence that induced us to wage an unnecessary and unwinnable war in Iraq that undermined our true national interests. Ledeen worked closely over decades with three of the most strategically well-placed (Jewish) neocons: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith. The Flynn/Ledeen insistence on a stronger rhetorical stance on Islam found its way into Trump’s speeches when he routinely chastised President Obama for his failure to say “radical Islamic extremists” when framing the national narrative that Trump’s (Orthodox Jewish) advisers made a focus of his presidential campaign consistent with their agenda for Greater Israel.
If we experience another emotionally wrenching mass murder that can plausibly be blamed on “radical Islamic extremists,” President Barack Obama will be responsible due to his failure to engage the facts of what my life experience proves. That presidential liability spans three presidencies and is poised to extend to a fourth. Had the intelligence I uncovered in Iraq been engaged in good faith by the FBI and/or our national security apparatus on my return from Baghdad in February 1997, Saddam Hussein could have been removed without a war. Personnel within both the F.B.I. and the D.I.A. were complicit in blocking an investigation able to confirm that the source of this corruption—and treason—traces to those skilled at waging war “by way of deception.” To avoid engagement, FBI agents (many of them Mormons) repeatedly sought to portray me as the problem.
As my father pointed out in a 1964 speech at Harvard University during his second of four terms as Governor of New York, those posing the greatest threat to our nation exhibit a “tireless genius for crisis.” Thus the well-timed revival of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal ten days prior to the Nov. 8 election by FBI Director James Comey, creating a campaign crisis that helped shift votes to Trump whose needy ego makes him an easily manipulated asset. Thus my heightened concern when the Trump transition team announced on January 5, 2016 that all Obama-appointed ambassadors were expected to vacate their ambassadorships no later than Inauguration Day 15 days later.
This is chillingly similar to what I encountered in Jakarta in March 2001, six months prior to the war-catalyzing mass murder of 9/11 when I was briefed by Lt. General Arie Kumaat, then head of Indonesian intelligence. Aware of the all-pervasive Israeli influence in shaping our national security policy, he sought a back channel to President Bush when Israel was found attempting to bribe members of the Indonesian Parliament to push the U.S. out of the South China Sea in favor of China. In a soundproof room built on stilts in a lake, he described how Indonesian intelligence uncovered a bribery operation channeled through a Jakarta-based nonprofit sponsored by Jewish-American financial speculator George Soros, a Hungarian émigré.
General Kumaat was also concerned that earlier that same week, India’s Minister of Defense had been removed for accepting a $25,000 bribe from an Israeli defense firm. At the same time, the same Israeli firm sought to bribe the Malaysian Defense Minister. We agreed that the small amounts suggested not bribes but coordinated sting operations meant to discredit senior defense officials. He described the operations as “out of theater repositioning”—the pre-staging of well-timed crises to destabilize key personnel in targeted venues, making it easier to manipulate decision-making during an international crisis. All three Israeli operations were staged six months prior to 9/11.
So whose interests are served by vacating the ranks of our diplomatic corps if those with a “tireless genius for crisis” stage crises in multiple venues? Of this I am certain, Team Trump will fill the ranks of “our” diplomatic corps with pro-Israelis, including Zionist Christians who will staff our embassies with personnel sharing a non-transparent bias. Which brings me to Steve Bannon.
Pro-Israeli Steve Bannon
White House “chief strategist” Steve Bannon was recruited as a campaign strategist from the alt-right Breitbart News where he served as Executive Chairman. His prominent role in the Trump presidency set off charges that he is a white nationalist, a racist and an anti-Semite. That portrayal lays the foundation for manipulating reactions within both the Black Lives Matter movement and among hate-mongering white power advocates.
In truth, Bannon is a political product of the Israeli Right. Andrew Breitbart worked at The Drudge Report and The Huffington Post before his concept for Breitbart News originated—while in Israel—as a media platform that would be unapologetically pro-Zionist. On Breitbart’s death in 2012, he was praised by pro-Israelis Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. Like his former boss, Bannon lavishes praise on extremists among the pro-Israeli Right, including Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Ongoing attempts to portray Bannon as an anti-Semite are misdirection by a predominantly pro-Israel mainstream media. According to Jared Kushner, “All I know about Steve is my experience working with him. He’s an incredible Zionist and loves Israel.”
When Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer left his first post-election meeting with President-elect Trump, he was quick to praise Bannon as was Zionist Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. In 2015, Bannon joined Breitbart’s (Jewish) CEO Larry Solov to launch Breitbart Jerusalem “specifically to cover the region from an unabashedly Zionist perspective.” Bannon also hosted 29 interviews with Frank Gaffney whose Center for Security Policy is known for its ultra-right Zionist views. Bannon praised Gaffney, insisting he is “doing amazing work, doing God’s work…Just fantastic.”
Tellingly, Bannon featured six interviews with Pamela Geller (“her time has come”). Founder of the pro-Israel, Islam-bashing American Freedom Defense Institute. Geller emerged as an outspoken post-9/11 opponent of the “ground zero mosque,” an opposition effort funded by Robert Mercer who also contributed $10 million to pro-Zionist Breitbart News. Revealingly, Geller was one of only five recipients of a Zionist “manifesto” written by Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik who killed 77 people on July 22, 2011 to draw attention to his manifesto. I am confident that Breivik’s mass murder marks the point in time when Zionist extremists shifted their focus to anti-Islam as the next hate-mongering narrative meant to induce us to wage their next war.
Based on Bannon’s known support for the Israeli Right and Greater Israel, one can only marvel at attempts to brand him anti-Semitic. That obvious deception only further heightens my concern at how soon that misleading portrayal will be used to support the next agenda-advancing crisis. Those who wage war by way of deception routinely pre-stage collateral crises to draw attention away from a main event—such as undermining the nuclear accord with Tehran. Based on the media coverage given both to the Black Lives Matter narrative and the white nationalist narrative, conflicts based on race or ethnicity are poised to emerge as the attention-diverting crises deployed to obscure the manipulation of an easily provoked Donald Trump to take us to war in Iran.
When candidate Trump did not immediately disavow his endorsement by David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader, that delay energized his alt-right base and pre-staged the plausibility of a racial conflict. The parallels with how fascists assumed power in Germany are chilling. Only this time, anti-Islam rather than anti-Semitism is positioned to emerge as the hate-mongering catalyst. With a mass murder provocation (such as a dirty bomb) plausibly traceable to “radical Islamic extremists,” it’s easy to imagine how an anti-Islam version of Kristallnacht could lead to the burning of mosques and the murder of Muslims. That violence, in turn, could coincide with a manufactured crisis of racially motivated riots—particularly if such civil unrest helps distract attention from those pre-staging another war in the Middle East.
But For the U.S.-Israel Relationship
Had the U.S. not agreed to a “special relationship” with the Zionist experiment now known as Israel, would a U.S. president, in effect, be assembling a War Cabinet with three generals as Cabinet-level appointees? I’ve no reason to believe that Donald Trump understands how his self-absorption was profiled and serviced to produce this presidency. Though this is clearly the Trump presidency, it would be wrong to describe it as “his” presidency. When Americans grasp how this presidency was produced—by whom and for whom—he will be remembered as the last president for Greater Israel.
When, as President-elect, Trump first met with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, he looked like a deer in the headlights. Three weeks later, after he harshly criticized Obama in one of his Twitter tirades, he received a call from Obama and shortly thereafter emerged from his Palm Beach estate to speak to the press. Looking like a schoolyard bully who had just been whipped, he stated that he and President Obama had a “very good conversation” though his body language indicated that he was chastised for his immature and reckless behavior.
His need to protect his ego, his image and his Trump brand makes him highly susceptible to manipulation by those who will use him just as previous presidents were used. Rest assured that (a) he has numerous skeletons in his closet including hushed-up sex and financial scandals, and (b) his scandals are known to his (predominantly Jewish) senior staff in the Trump Organization. If the experience of past presidents is any indication, the threatened release of those scandals will be used to shape presidential decision-making, particularly when it comes to issues critical to Greater Israel.
Speaking in Code
Trillions of dollars and countless lives have been squandered due to our entangled alliance with Israel. The tragedy in Syria, set in motion by Israel, could trigger the next global military crisis. When CNN described conditions in Aleppo as a “holocaust,” it was apparent that manipulators of the national narrative were nearby. For the U.S., Syria offered a no-win scenario. We still do not know if the use of chemical weapons in Syria was a false flag attack meant to induce us to invade Syria as a means to take us to war in Iran—for Greater Israel. However we do know that the Trump presidency is staffed at the top by people he trusts who are demonstrably rightwing pro-Israel.
For a candidate who disparaged regime change, Team Trump is brimming with people committed to the use of duplicity to produce regime change. That includes the manipulation of our political process to produce the Trump regime. At least three of his most trusted (Orthodox Jewish) advisers—Kushner, Friedman and Greenblatt—know that more settlements will incite more hatred against the U.S., ensuring in response the radical Islamic extremism required to justify a war with Iran—for Greater Israel. This is how “nonlinear warfare” is deployed to induce a target (such as the U.S.) to act against its own true interests.
Known in game theory warfare as “active measures,” this behavior typifies how so few can exert such vast influence through “reflexive control”—anticipating our reaction to events staged by those with a “tireless genius for crisis.” Thus the reflexive control on display in our overwrought reaction to the provocation of 9/11. Thus too the key role played in the microtargeting of persuade-ables by falsely portraying—as an anti-Semite—Trump campaign strategist Steven Bannon. In effect, that portrayal enabled psychographic microtargeters to deceive “alt right” voters (including anti-Semites and white nationalists) to support a candidate advised by Israel’s most extreme right-wing supporters.
This voter fraud would have been impossible but for a mainstream media long dominated by pro-Israelis. Had white nationalist/alt-right voters known that the Trump candidacy was not America First but Israel First, would they have rallied to his side? Mainstream media is itself a key source of fake news that put this classic asset in the Oval Office.
Democrats selected pro-Israeli New York Senator Chuck Schumer as Senate Minority Leader and Illinois Senator Dick Durbin as Minority Whip. No mainstream media outlet mentioned that Durbin was handpicked by the Israel lobby to replace Congressman Paul Findley and then groomed for the Senate. That 1982 campaign marked the first time that the Zionist lobby openly removed a member of Congress after Findley committed political suicide by challenging Israeli policy on Palestine.
By promising unity between Democrats and Republicans, Schumer made it more difficult to identify the influence of Israel and its lobby when another Pearl Harbor-like provocation is staged to induce another war in the Middle East. Tellingly, Democrat Schumer and Republican John McCain were the first Senators to criticize Secretary of State John Kerry for his December 28th critique of Israeli settlement policies as a barrier to peace in the Middle East.
When Schumer announced the new Senate leadership, he signaled Israeli confidence in what can be accomplished with the pro-Israeli Team Trump running the Executive Branch allied with pro-Israeli Republicans and Democrats in key positions of influence in the Congress. When introducing his Senate team, including progressive Bernie Sanders, this New York Zionist described the two opposing parties as standing “shoulder-to-shoulder.” That signature phrase was made famous by rightwing Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon who routinely used that phrase when describing how, after 9/11, the U.S. and Israel would stand “shoulder-in-shoulder” in combating terrorism.
Schumer’s choice of words may have been ‘code’ signaling Israelis and pro-Israelis that all is well—much as, ten days prior to 9/11, Tel Aviv announced a $1 million gift to Israeli super-spy Jonathan Pollard who did as much to undermine U.S. national security as any American in modern history. Pollard was then granted Israeli citizenship by grateful Zionists even though Reagan-era Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger urged his execution. Israel pretends to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the U.S. while abusing its “special relationship” to advance Greater Israel.
The Cost of this Entangled Alliance
Both Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Al Gore in 2000 won the popular vote. In both cases, their loss in the Electoral College traced to key states—particularly Florida in 2000 where pro-Israelis wield outsized influence. The Trump campaign lacked the ground game to generate those electoral results. Thus the social media-enabled microtargeting of voters as Kushner, Bannon, Mercer & Co. focused on a few key states required to prevail in the Electoral College. That outcome was sought by those who wanted the insecure and immature Donald Trump in the White House to wage the next war for Greater Israel just as they wanted the dysfunctional and pliable George W. Bush in 2000—to wage an unnecessary and unwinnable war—for Greater Israel. Hillary Clinton was far less likely to lead us into another war.
She attended enough classified briefings to know the role that Israel and its lobby repeatedly played in deceiving us to act against our true national interests. The same holds true for Al Gore who was too knowledgeable and, unlike Dubya, too functional to lead us into an unwinnable war in the Middle East. By manipulating the 2000 election to make it appear that George Bush stole the election, pro-Israeli operatives retained a plausible cover (“We really wanted Gore.”) had the intelligence I gathered in Baghdad in 1997 been engaged in good faith prior to a November 2000 “election” that installed a Born Again Zionist Christian as “our” Commander-in-Chief.
The Trump presidency is a fraud. With what my life experience proves, it can be proven who was behind his “election.” Russian interference is the “chads” of 2016 with the Supreme Court ruling January 2001 to give the election to Dubya based on a recount involving disputed ballots. Gore, like Hillary, won the popular vote. Gore by more than a half-million votes and Hillary by 2.9 million. The “chads” controversy made it appear that Dubya stole the 2000 election just as Russia “interfered” with the 2016 election. Their fear is what will happen when it is proven that Israel was behind 9/11 and what has followed. My life experience proves this beyond a reasonable doubt.
They wanted the public to think that they wanted Gore and Hillary as Commander-in-Chief when in fact they really wanted Dubya for his Born Again Zionist Christian beliefs and Trump for his narcissism, greed and lack of ethics. Eight days after his “election,” his Orthodox Jewish son-in-law met with the Chairman of Anbang Insurance Group, one of China’s largest corporations with no real disclosure of its true owners. While Trump was screaming that China is the worst, his son-in-law was negotiating billion-dollar deals with them eight days after the “election.”
They required Dubya and his unfulfilled needs to pull off 9/11 and induce him to remove Saddam as part of Tel Aviv’s regime change agenda for Greater Israel. Making it appear that Trump (like Bush) stole the election was a “double blind cover” meant to obscure the fact that Jewish elites and extremists knew they could more easily manipulate Trump’s needs than persuade Hillary to advance their agenda as she did in Libya. Though a hawk, I believe that Hillary Clinton—like Al Gore—would have been far more difficult to manipulate while Mitt Romney’s Mormon-Zionist beliefs would have made him easy. Trump’s needy persona makes him even easier, particularly when advised by hardline Zionists that he trusts.
Dubya was deceived to lead our allies into an unnecessary and unwinnable war reliant on false and outright fixed intelligence. Deploying classic game theory warfare, Tel Aviv knew it could rely on the Sunni-Shia conflict to catalyze the radical Islamic extremists of ISIL. An invasion-induced cascade of reactions reignited an ancient conflict-of-opposites (Sunni vs. Shia) that, in turn, enabled Israel to ally with Sunni Saudi Arabia, its perceived enemy, with a shared dislike of Shia Iran. The only winner: Jewish elites and extremists skilled at leveraging their small numbers to great effect through nonlinear game theory warfare.
The Bush/Trump Doctrine
When Israeli policy was embraced as the Bush Doctrine (“go anywhere and kill anyone seen as a threat”), the U.S. forfeited its moral leadership earned at enormous cost in blood and treasure during WWII. That’s a key reason Zionists wanted George Bush and Dick Cheney in 2000 not Al Gore and Joe Lieberman. Plus Israel needed Lieberman in the Senate post-9/11 as the key salesman—along with asset John McCain—for the false intelligence that deceived us to pursue Israel’s destabilizing regime change strategy in Iraq, a nation that played no role in 9/11. With the Israel lobby emboldened by the Trump victory and John McCain serving as chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services, the risks of another war are very real—awaiting only the next well-timed crisis.
Without the mass murder provocation of 3,000 people on 9/11, Zionist Christian George W. Bush likely would not have been induced to lead the U.S. and its allies to war in Iraq in March 2003. When, in March 2015, the right-wing Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu addressed a joint meeting of Congress in an attempt to scuttle negotiations with Tehran, had a crisis been staged with U.S. casualties—plausibly traceable to Tehran—the major world powers would not now enjoy a nuclear accord with Iran. Thus the very real risks of continuing an alliance with an enclave of elites and extremists known to possess a “tireless genius for crisis” and a history of waging wars “by way of deception”—often by deceiving others to wage their wars for them. Israel is not our agent in the Middle East as some among its defenders claim; we’ve long been their agent, albeit without the public’s knowledge or informed consent.
Those who induced Donald Trump to run for president (he never expected to win) prompted his promise to scrap the accord with Iran. If he withdraws U.S. support, the accord will remain in place. The impact would ensure that we further isolate ourselves internationally, alienate our allies and discredit ourselves even more, leaving us with Israel as one of our few remaining allies, an outcome that key Team Trump advisers appear willing to embrace. That agenda could be accelerated with another mass murder early on in the Trump presidency—as with Bush when the crisis of 9/11 was staged less than eight months after his January 2001 inaugural.
After overseeing the digital media campaign, Jared Kushner became a trusted voice overseeing a transition team tasked with staffing the executive branch with the 4,700+ positions that an incoming president appoints. The influence of Mitt Romney supporters Bibi Netanyahu and Sheldon Adelson became apparent when Trump agreed to meet with Romney who both men supported for president in 2012, apparently anticipating he would lead us to war with Iran. Now they are relying on Trump and those to whom he was induced to turn for advice, including Rahm Israel Emanuel, President Obama’s first White House chief of staff.
Selling Conflicts of Opposites
As Russian President Vladimir Putin conceded in June 2013 at Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center, the first Soviet government “was 80-85 percent Jewish.” In the U.S., the Greater Israel lobby has long been feared for its political clout. Add to that power the influence wielded by mainstream media and the major film studios (both dominantly Jewish-owned or controlled) and it becomes clear how difficult it is to protect our national interests from those adept at manipulating our national narrative to wage war by way of deception.
As the profitable Cold War conflict-of-opposites receded into the background, the storyline of the West vs. Islam emerged in the foreground as a new opportunity for war profiteering. A Vladimir Putin-led Russia poses an existential threat not to the U.S. but to those hoping to use the Trump presidency to take us to war in Iran for Greater Israel, an effort that Moscow is certain to resist as is Beijing. Those promoting that war are reviving The Clash of Civilizations, an agenda-advancing narrative first devised in 1990 by Zionist Bernard Lewis, a professor at Princeton University. The portrayal of Vladimir Putin as a foreign manipulator of our presidential election obscures both ongoing electoral manipulation for Greater Israel and a manipulation of the national narrative by the Israel lobby and their pro-Israeli allies in media and popular culture.
Here’s one example of the costly and profitable nature of their duplicity. In the seven-year interval between the Communist-bashing House Un-American Activities Committee hearings of 1947 and the Senate’s “Red Scare” McCarthy hearings in 1954, Hallgarten & Co. investment banker Donald Stralem produced the film Duck And Cover. Shown by mandatory attendance to more than 40 million American schoolchildren nationwide, the film instructed students that—when they saw the flash of an atomic bomb—to duck under their desks and cover their heads. At a 1951 cost of $350,000 ($3.2 million in 2017 dollars), this senior manager of Rothschild interests in the U.S. succeeded with this film in terrifying an entire generation of post-WWII Baby Boomer children and their parents.
The rationale cited for government sponsorship of that psy-ops film was the “emotion management” requirements of Truman-era Civil Defense during a presidency produced by (predominantly Jewish) organized crime. Stralem’s financial and geostrategic goal was to internalize—at an early age—the fear and insecurity required to ensure support for decades of Cold War defense spending. That 9-1/2 minute film seared into the national psyche the fear of an imminent “atomic bomb” attack by Soviet Evil Doers. With the help of Hollywood, pliable politicians and mainstream media, that internalized narrative sustained tens of trillions of dollars in national security spending from WWII until the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and beyond. In 1956, Stralem arranged for the marriage of my mother to the brother of Robert King Cunningham. In effect, that marriage put a Rothschild operative in my home when I was four years old.
The “Red Scare” was recently revived along with another costly price tag—a pledge to spend $1 trillion to update and upgrade America’s nuclear arsenal—despite knowing those weapons can never be used without irrevocably harming the planet. Thus the need to cast Vladimir Putin as an Evil Doer to revive the profitable Cold War narrative. As with the war in Iraq, we will need to borrow the funds for this highly profitable project. The financial cost alone of the war in Iraq—to the U.S. alone—is projected to top $6 trillion, including $4 trillion in interest paid through 2053.
How Many More Wars for Israel?
The scope and scale of this profitable deceit is difficult to grasp. In 1948, Chaim Weizmann assured Harry Truman that Zionists would take no more land. Now we know that’s what they intended from the outset. Shimon Peres took pride at how he deceived us while he secured the components required for Israel to build its arsenal of nuclear weapons. When Israel launched its Sinai Campaign (aka the Suez Crisis) during the last week of President Eisenhower’s 1956 reelection campaign, Ike was outraged knowing that he had been lied to when Zionists assured him in 1948 that they would take no more land—and then used his credibility to assure Arab leaders of that lie as a means to counter General George Marshall’s adamant opposition (as Secretary of State) to Truman’s recognition of this extremist enclave as a legitimate state.
Ariel Sharon assured us that, if Saddam Hussein were removed, Israel would make peace with the Palestinians. Now they’ve made a two-state solution impossible and extremist members of Israel’s governing coalition seek to grant legal title to privately owned Palestinian lands occupied by Jewish settlers. As lineal descendants of David, they believe they have both a God-given right to that land and a right to operate above the law. Senior members of Team Trump embrace that narrative.
I am confident that this shared belief is why the Talmud was bifurcated in the 5th Century AD. That bifurcation created the Babylonian Talmud, a key reason why those responsible deceived us to wage their war in Iraq to bring their narrative full-circle back to the land of the original Semites who were not Jewish but those who lived in the marshes of Iraq, the original meaning of the word “Semite.” The lineal rights of the Davidic line of Judaism trace directly to Leo Strauss and the Hesse region of Germany where descendants of this lineage fine-tuned the duplicitous techniques that enabled Zionism to ravage the U.S. and other nations.
As my life experience proves, Zionists are far more dangerous than radical Islamic extremists. Jews, Christians and Muslims lived together peaceably in the region until the arrival of the Zionists. It’s clear that Zionists never intended to abide by the agreements they made to gain U.S. support for establishing the Jewish state. Their goal from the outset was to provoke hatred and foment serial wars and crises as a means to expand their influence throughout the region, the outcome that most concerned our Joint Chiefs when they urged that Harry Truman decline their tearful requests.
While I was in Baghdad in January/February 1997, Saddam Hussein closed the ancient site of Babylon for a guided tour by an Iraqi colleague and me. On our return, personnel within the F.B.I. and the D.I.A. sought to use photos taken of us there as a means to preclude consideration of the intelligence with which we returned that could have removed Saddam without a war. Based on the consistency of the behavior that I profiled my entire life, I am confident that Zionists directed the operations that ensured I was silenced so they could deceive us to wage their war for Greater Israel. From this point forward, the facts proven by my experience suggest that anyone urging support for Israel should be considered complicit in treason. Thus my concern that the Trump presidency was produced not to Make America Great Again but to advance the interests of Greater Israel—at the expense of Americans.
Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump proposed to relocate our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, granting Zionists the perception that Americans recognize that ancient city as “the eternal capital of the Jewish people.” That provocation is certain to outrage Muslims worldwide and further inflame those who already hate us—due largely to the costs we imposed on others traceable to this entangled alliance. The history of this “special relationship” suggests that more hatred toward us is the outcome sought by each such provocation. Those most clearly complicit—as proven by my life experience—trace their modern-day origins to the Hesse region of Germany and to a banking clan with the ironic family motto: “Harmony, Integrity, Industry.”
Pre-staging the Next Conflict-of-Opposites
Mainstream media portrays Trump supporters as uneducated white nationalists and racists. In truth, many of them are understandably upset at being left behind by Washington’s embrace of the financial markets-obsessed “consensus” model of economics and the job-displacing forces set in motion by the consensus version of globalization. However, when it becomes clear to his disaffected base that a Trump presidency cannot deliver what was promised—and they expect—they will respond. If those who produced the Trump presidency can induce him to lead the U.S. into another war, we could see this nation fracture as never before under the strain of multiple crises—social, fiscal, geopolitical, financial and ecological—generating an outcome that will only further augment the influence of those identified.
The annual budget for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now approaches $42 billion. The Patriot Act, drafted well prior to 9/11, authorizes suspension of the Constitution, including habeas corpus. My life experience suggests that DHS was founded not to protect Americans from radical Islamic extremists but to protect the perpetrators when Americans realize that this duplicity traces to a common source.
If, as the facts suggest, the goal is to trigger domestic violence, the DHS (and the National Guard) can be mobilized to detain the disaffected, including Trump’s base—adding outrage to their frustration and resentment and their eventual disillusionment at being deceived—as they were. Based on the pre-staging to date, the most likely conflict-of-opposites will be provoked between those branded as white nationalists and those active in the Black Lives Matter movement.
Political strategist Steve Bannon is being branded by mainstream media as a plausible instigator conspiring from the shadows to mobilize the disgruntled alt-right. This social media-savvy adviser knows how to mobilize “persuade-ables” to achieve a political objective, as he proved November 8th. Conventional elections featuring informed choice can be displaced with the use of divisive rhetoric (that can later be disavowed) designed to penetrate online “filter bubbles” and reach the disaffected in their social media silos and online echo chambers. For those skilled at advancing their goals by way of deception under the cover of well-timed crisis, Bannon is an ideal adviser for a president produced by those chronicled in this account.
If It Looks Like Fascism…
No one knows what will happen when Americans realize that their freedom now depends on freeing their government from the outsized influence wielded by Israel, pro-Israelis and the Israel lobby. What happens when that knowledge reaches a critical mass? In the Age of Transparency, it will. What’s the reaction when a long-deceived American public realize that their informed choice was manipulated to take us to war for Jewish elites and extremists?
What we now see emerging is Fascism Lite. Donald Trump’s easily profiled ego ensures he will do whatever is required to protect his self-interest and preclude his exposure as a political fraud and a reality show clown. That doesn’t mean he’s evil—only that he’s a political product of those masterful at manipulating the needs of such assets. With both houses of Congress in the hands of pro-Israeli Republicans, with pro-Israeli Democrats (such as Chuck Schumer) holding key positions in the Congress, and with a pliable asset in the White House advised by rightwing Jewish extremists, the Zionist vision of global domination by The Chosen is now seen by them as a real possibility.
An enemies list is usually the first step in creating a fascist state like Germany in the 1930s. Lists created during the “Red scare” of the 1950s (traceable to this same trans-generational criminal syndicate) helped create and consolidate the Far Right control now emergent in Washington. When those with a tireless genius for crisis create and then exploit this shift to the political right, the outcome risks the suspension of key rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Despite my being subjected to serial criminal stalking for 35 years (still ongoing), I continue to be denied access to the rule of law to protect myself. If this can be done to one American—with impunity—in a nation governed by the rule of law, what does that say for the security and freedom of others?
Those complicit in this duplicity have long operated in the U.S. and worldwide as war profiteers. Their genius for well-timed crisis enables them to create serial conflicts-of-opposites (the opposing sides are irrelevant) while profiting off the misery of both sides. As the Cold War wound down, they ramped up radical Islamic extremism as the new agenda-setting, profit-making narrative. Muslims are now the target of hate just as Jews were targeted by those who produced the post-WWI financial conditions in Germany that evoked in response an ethnic nationalism led by Chancellor Adolph Hitler. Anti-Semitism enabled these duplicitous few to hide in plain sight as WWII segued seamlessly into the profitable Cold War. Without missing a budgetary beat, the war on terror emerged as this latest marketing of fear and insecurity morphed into the War on Islam—with no end in sight.
But For Well-Timed Crises
Without the mass murder of the WWII Holocaust, even Harry Truman, a dysfunctional Zionist Christian Democrat, could not have been persuaded to recognize this enclave of extremists as a legitimate state. Without the mass murder of 9/11, even George Bush, a dysfunctional Zionist Christian Republican, could not have been persuaded to invade Iraq, a nation that had nothing to do with 9/11. At each hinge of modern history, the facts point to the same source of duplicity as a key reason the U.S. has not been at war for only 21 years since its founding.
Those complicit financed both sides in our Civil War of the 1860s. Even now, no one can explain how the world’s great powers were induced to wage the senseless slaughter of WWI. The post-war reparations burden imposed on Germany was certain to humiliate a proud people, catalyzing an angry reaction that—consistent with nonlinear game theory warfare—fueled an extremist form of nationalism (sound familiar?) that became the National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazis). At every step we find at work in the background those with a tireless genius for crisis skilled at waging way by way of deception.
The past 150+ years have been a study in mass murder, mayhem and forgone opportunities while a sociopathic few profited. That includes the U.S. being induced to wage an unwinnable war in Vietnam that killed more than 58,000 Americans and as many as 1.5 million Vietnamese—and for what? President Kennedy wanted us to disengage. After his murder, successor Lyndon Johnson, another Zionist Christian presidential product, led us even deeper into that morass. When LBJ withdrew from the presidential race in March 1968 and presidential candidate Robert Kennedy was murdered in June, a Henry Kissinger-advised presidency led by Richard Nixon expanded the war into Cambodia and Laos, ensuring another seven years of war profiteering.
In the age of transparency, those doing this—over centuries—know they are now at risk of being exposed. With exposure comes the prospect of accountability under law for capital crimes, including treason. That possibility may motivate those complicit to stage crises that are even more severe in their impact and more wide-ranging in their reach. Israel reportedly possesses suitcase-sized nuclear weapons. For those who view themselves as the Chosen of God accountable only to a god of their choosing, will they opt for self-destruction rather than concede personal responsibility?
When world leaders are forced by an informed public to acknowledge the source of the problem, what happens if, in the interest of peace, those leaders insist on the nuclear weapons-free Middle East that was sought by President Kennedy in 1963? What will be the response if, as my life experience proves, those responsible murder those who interfere with their agenda for Greater Israel? That possibility is suggested by the well-timed murder in January 2002 of Lt. General Arie Kumaat, the head of Indonesian Intelligence, just as he was arranging for me to brief Muslim heads of state on the false intelligence that took us to war in Iraq. [See “The Indonesia Connection” and “The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented” on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.]
Who Should Be Held Accountable?
Accountability begins by acknowledging that Israel and its lobby have long manipulated Jewish identity and preyed on the fear and insecurity of the broader Jewish community. In 1948, this community knew that Zionist elites and extremists posed a threat to their assimilation. Skeptics of the Zionist experiment have been proven correct—at enormous cost to the U.S. and other nations induced to ally with the Jewish state. The consistency of their behavior confirms that Albert Einstein and 27 other prominent Jews were correct in their December 4, 1948 letter to The New York Times when they described Zionist leaders as “Jewish fascists” who seek a “leader state.” Jewish novelist Hannah Arendt called them simply “Jewish Nazis.” Since 1948, they’ve become steadily more rightwing. When Yitzhak Rabin showed a more moderate face of Israeli leadership, Benjamin Netanyahu’s incitement of Likud Party extremists provoked in November 1995 the assassination of Rabin by Likud member Yigal Amir. Seven months later, Netanyahu became prime minister.
This is not “a people” doing this. Those responsible are our leaders—both civilian and military—who knew about this duplicity yet continued to allow those complicit to operate with legal impunity. That includes President Barack Obama who was long ago informed of what can be proven by my life experience profiling those who befriend to betray and foster trust in order to defraud. Israel is not a friend but an enemy within. The cost of their treachery is incalculable—and growing. The boundless self-absorption of their latest prime minister mirrors the self-absorption of a persona now serving as “our” Commander-in-Chief which is all part of this long-running fraud on humanity.
Among the many dangers posed by this duplicity is the support that this pattern of behavior gives to those who believe that “New York Jews” are responsible for many of the world’s problems. Any further delay in exposing the how of this deceit can only serve to revive and reinforce prejudices and bigotries rather than proceeding consistent with the evidence-based rule of law. The facts of my life experience prove not only how but also who and why. What’s been done by those profiled was not done to us, we were deceived to do it to ourselves, as with waging their war in Iraq.
No one can Make America Great Again without reforming—or severing—an entangled alliance that has for far too long imposed a hidden tax on humanity while also endangering the broader Jewish community. Forcing the Israel lobby to comply with the Foreign Agents Registration Act is the barest minimum required to begin to restore our national security and protect our national interests. Had the requirements of FARA been enforced, the Trump “election” would have been impossible. Restoration of the rule of law requires accountability at law for those my life experience proves are responsible for ongoing crimes against humanity.
- Photograph of Sheldon and Miriam Adelson
- Photograph of Jared Kushner
- Photograph of David Friedman
- Photograph of Jason Greenblatt
- Photograph of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson
- Photograph of Leo Strauss
- Photograph of Robert Mercer
- Photograph of Rebekah Mercer
- Photograph of Paul Singer
- Photograph of Kellyanne Conway
- Photograph of Tom Cotton with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of Ron Dermer with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of Mitt Romney with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of Ted Cruz with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of Marco Rubio with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of Shmuley Boteach w/ Michael Jackson
- Photograph of Newt Gingrich with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of Lindsey Graham with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of John McCain with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of Joe Lieberman with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of Chuck Schumer with Bibi Netanyahu
- Photograph of Steve Bannon
- Duck and Cover logo
- Photograph of Chaim Weizmann with Harry Truman
- Photograph of Harry Truman with Eddie Jacobson
- Photograph of Truman & Jacobson Haberdashery
- Photograph of Mark Zuckerberg w/ Facebook logo
- Photograph of Larry Page w/ Google logo
- Photograph of Sergei Brin w/ Google logo
- Photograph of Dan Senor
- Photograph of Pamela Geller
- Photograph of Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn
- Photograph of Michael Ledeen w/ cover of book
 On April 10, 1948, one day after the Israeli killing of ~250 Palestinians in the village of Deir Yassin, Albert Einstein wrote to the “American Friends of the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel” to assure them that he did not want “to see anybody associated with these misled and criminal people.”
 From March 2013 The Costs of War Project by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University drawn from actual expenditures by the U.S. Treasury and future commitments. The figure $1.7 trillion includes war expenses and an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans. An extra $4 trillion factors in interest paid through 2053.
 Dr. Glenn A. Olds advised my father from 1945 until my father’s death in January 1979. They met at the founding conference of the United Nations in San Francisco. Glenn advised me from 1994 until his death in March 2006.
 In 2005, Mr. Strong acknowledged in a letter to Glenn that Glenn served as his mentor and thanked him profusely.
 Bill Clinton’s second-term Cabinet included in key posts Robert Rubin as Secretary of the Treasury, Lawrence Summers as Rubin’s Deputy and Madeleine Albright as Secretary of State.
 See Introduction to The Hidden Tax on Humanity on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 I was born in 1952. My birthfather was Nelson Rockefeller. See the draft introduction to The Hidden Tax on Humanity posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 Donald Stralem was the son of Hallgarten co-founder Casimir Stralem. For the role played by Donald Stralem in placing a Rothschild operative in my home when I was four years old, see the draft introduction to The Hidden Tax on Humanity on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com. The Rothschild family traces its origins to the German duchy of Hesse and to the banking business founded in Frankfurt by Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812). Much of the family’s fortune traces to their profiting from serial wars, including the French Revolution after which Rothschild dispatched his five sons to establish a banking business in the capital cities of France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy and Austria. During the Napoleonic Wars, London-based N.M. Rothschild & Sons financed the British war effort while also secretly funding Napoleon Bonaparte. The family’s net worth now exceeds a reported $350 billion with control of more than $2 trillion in assets worldwide. “Rothschild Family’s Net Worth Explained,” Investopedia, September 26, 2016.
 Leo Strauss also played a key role in the “pagan fascism” that served as the foundation for what became the Nazis led by Adolph Hitler. For an overview of the multi-decade role played in this systemic criminality by my Uncle David Rockefeller, see draft excerpts from The Hidden Tax on Humanity posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
 Truman Secretary of State James Byrnes was one of Bernard Baruch’s most notable political productions for whom he financed the nation’s first-ever statewide “radio buy” of political ads. Byrnes became a Congressman in 1910, a U.S. Senator in 1930 and then a Roosevelt-appointed Supreme Court Justice before emerging as Secretary of State for Truman during the critical post-war period that pre-staged the geopolitical dynamics of what became the Cold War, a phrase reportedly coined by Baruch and his publicist, Herbert Bayard Swope, who branded Baruch “the park bench diplomat.” See the Introduction to The Hidden Tax on Humanity at www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
 In late 1947, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) wrote that “A decision to partition Palestine, if the decision were supported by the United States, would prejudice United States strategic interests in the Near and Middle East” to the point that “United States influence in the area would be curtailed to that which could be maintained by military force.” On March 31, 1948, the JCS released “Force Requirements for Palestine.” In that paper, they predicted that “the Zionist strategy will seek to involve [the United States] in a continuously widening and deepening series of operations intended to secure maximum Jewish objectives.” Mark Perry, “Petraeus wasn’t the first,” Foreign Policy, April 2, 2010. See also Alison Weir, Against Our Better Judgment (If America Knew, 2014).
 See Susanne Craig, Jo Roberts and Jesse Drucker, “Jared Kushner, a Trump In-Law and Adviser, Chases a Chinese Deal,” The New York Times, January 7, 2017.
 In the summer of 2016, Jared Kushner “created a data science and campaign group in San Antonio, Texas, modeled like a start-up, and hired CA.” Gillian Tett, “Trump won by reaching real voters hidden in big data,” Financial Times, January 27, 1017.
 As of June 2016, Mercer had donated $13.5 million to the Cruz campaign and $2 million to a John Bolton political action committee. President-elect Trump identified Bolton as a leading candidate for Secretary of State. One of the signers of the January 26, 1998 letter to President Bill Clinton from the neoconservative Project for a New American Century urging regime change in Iraq, Bolton served as a foreign policy adviser to the 2012 presidential campaign of Mormon Mitt Romney. Presidential aspirant Newt Gingrich announced that he would ask Bolton to serve as his Secretary of State. Active in the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), Bolton suggested three times during the 2008 presidential campaign that Israel may attack Iran after the November election. As a U.N. Assistant Secretary of State during the G.H.W. Bush presidency, Bolton led an effort to rescind a U.N. resolution from the 1970s that equated Zionism with racism. Thus the geopolitical threat posed to the legitimacy of the Jewish state by the 2001 Durban World Conference Against Racism.
 See John Bolton, “Brexit victory is a true populist revolt,” Boston Globe, June 24, 2016. One of the first foreign leaders whose congratulations Donald Trump received was not the British Prime Minister, a long-standing tradition, but British politician Nigel Farage, leader of the U.K. Independence Party and a prominent supporter of the Brexit campaign.
 Psychological microtargeting identifies different personality styles (32 in the methodology deployed by Cambridge Analytica) that enable the segmentation of voter groups when targeting ad messages and crafting contact scripts to ensure that the messaging matches the style.
 This combination of self-profiling and micro-targeting dates to no later than the ‘tear sheets’ included in magazines such as Seventeen and T.V. Guide owned by Triangle Publications controlled by Walter Annenberg, son of Moses (“Mo”) Annenberg, a former Chicago mobster and innovator of the racing wire service that served as a financial backbone for the National Crime Syndicate. Owner of the influential Philadelphia Inquirer, Walter Annenberg was Ronald Reagan’s “best friend for 50 years” according to First Lady Nancy Reagan.
 Adam Pearce, “Trump Has Spent a Fraction of What Clinton Has on Ads,” The New York Times, October 21, 2016. Though political action committees (PACs) are forbidden from directly coordinating” with political campaigns, the sanctions are delayed, minor and levied only in hindsight (if ever) while the pay-off is immediate and huge, as seen in the Electoral College outcome.
 The pro-Israeli extremists behind the production of the Trump presidency (e.g., Ron Dermer, David Friedman, Bibi Netanyahu, Sheldon Adelson, Paul Singer, etc.) are shielded from scrutiny by a layered front of “conservatives” (such as donors Robert & Rebekah Mercer) to protect from exposure the (predominantly Jewish) neoconservatives who fixed the intelligence that induced us to war in Iraq to advance the long-sought goal of Greater Israel. This nonlinear modus operandi typifies how the operations of this trans-generational criminal syndicate are diffused and sustained in “fields within fields…within fields” of relationships that stretch across time, distance and both major political parties. This field-based structure enables systemic criminality to proceed in plain view and oftentimes with only modest coordination around shared goals. As explained in Guilt By Association (at pp. 206): “Julius Stulman, president of B’nai B’rith, sponsored the publication of a series of books that helped explain how this phenomenon operates through overlapping fields of relationships that stretch across time and distance. Showcasing pioneers in psychology such as Abraham Maslow and Ervin Laszlo, Stulman served as editor and publisher. Similar to a ‘Venn Diagram’ of overlapping circles, this fields-within-fields framing offers a means to visualize how this field-based phenomenon is sustained. Fields Within Fields…Within Fields (New York: The World Institute Council, 1968-1972).”
 Bob Mercer made his fortune as a minority shareholder in a hedge fund founded by James Simons whose 2016 wealth of $16.5 billion ranks him 24th on the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans. With Mercer’s help, Simons’ Renaissance Technologies Corp. devised pattern-recognition algorithms to identify “inefficiencies” in highly liquid securities, enabling Mercer’s take-home pay to top $330 million from 2011-2013. Mercer’s “probabilistic” approach to profiting off flash trading in financial markets is consistent with the probabilistic game theory math underlying Israeli game theory warfare chronicled in Chapter 1 of Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. The chapter is titled “Game Theory and the Mass Murder of 9/11” (also posted www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com). Game theory algorithms enable probabilistic outcomes to emerge (often catalyzed by well-timed crises) while obscuring how a duplicitous few can leverage their small numbers to great effect. The $600,000 in Mercer-funded opposition to Oregon Democrat Peter Fazio’s 2010 reelection suggests that their financial motive was opposition to a Fazio-proposed transaction tax that would have squeezed out flash traders. Alex Altman, “Silent Partners,” Time, October 10, 2016.
 Kenneth P. Vogel, “The heiress quietly shaping Trump’s operation,” Politico, November 21 2016.
 For example, he moderated his stances on immigration, deportation, Obamacare, waterboarding, climate change and a promise to name a federal prosecutor to fulfill an anti-Clinton demand among Trump supporters (“Lock her Up.”).
 Prior to the election, Trump adviser Walid Phares claimed that the promise to relocate the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem would be done under consensus, a strategy confirmed during the post-election period. That’s the only Israel-related issue on which there’s been any moderation in Trump’s radically pro-Israel campaign stance.
 In a clear act of defiance following the January 20 Trump inaugural, on January 22, the Jerusalem City Council approved 566 new housing units in East Jerusalem and two days later the Israeli government announced that 2,500 new housing units would be build in the West Bank. Isabel Kershner, “A Bolder Israel Plans to Expand Its Settlements,” The New York Times, January 25, 2017, p. 1.
 Quoted in Susanne Craig, Jo Roberts and Jesse Drucker, “Jared Kushner, a Trump In-Law and Adviser, Chases a Chinese Deal,” The New York Times, January 7, 2017.
 Daniella Diaz and Tal Kopan, “Trump picks campaign adviser Friedman as US ambassador to Israel,” The New York Times, December 16, 2016. Both the Trump Foundation and a Kushner family foundation provided financial support to Friends of Beit El Institutions, an Israeli settlement fund led by David Friedman. Friedman’s “kapos” comment was directed at J Street, a moderate pro-Israeli group that Trump supporter Sheldon Adelson compares to Hezbollah.
 The absence of any criticism of Trump’s rightwing pro-Israeli appointees or even a willingness to defend critics of rightwing Israeli policies only further confirms the need to ensure that the expansive Israel lobby complies with the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Those U.S.-based organizations include, for example, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), Christians United for Israel (CUFI), the Israel American Council (IAC) and dozens of other organizations advancing Israeli interests in the U.S.—often contrary to our national interest. Their efforts are often subsidized by U.S. taxpayers with tax-deductible contributions. Multi-billionaires Sheldon and Miriam Adelson are principal funders of ZOA, CUFI and IAC. Many of these organizations actively sought to induce the U.S. to invade Syria and lobbied to undermine the nuclear accord with Iran. AIPAC reportedly budgeted $25 million for television ads attacking the accord and flew nearly 1,000 AIPAC members to Washington to lobby members of Congress. If that is not the work of foreign agents, what is? See Jason Zengerle, “Sheldon Adelson Is Ready to Buy the Presidency,” New York Magazine, September 7, 2015.
 Trump signaled that he was considering the Friedman and Greenblatt appointments no later than mid-April 2016. See “Trump Meets With Orthodox Jews and Reveals His Israel Advisers—His Jewish Lawyers,” Haaretz, April 16. 2016.
 New Jersey Governor and presidential aspirant Chris Christie was appointed to head the Trump transition team until his removal in mid-November 2016 reportedly due to concerns that his “Bridgegate” scandal may taint the Trump presidency and fears that he was bringing in too many lobbyists, undermining the Trump campaign promise to “drain the swamp.” Critics asked whether Kushner, who argued against naming Christie as Trump’s running mate, was concerned that Christie, a former U.S. attorney, led the successful 2004 prosecution of Kushner’s father, Charles. Alex Isenstadt, “Inside Chris Christie’s fall from grace,” Politico, November 19, 2016. Unmentioned was the possible Kushner concern that Christie also led a corruption and international money-laundering investigation that led to charges in July 2009 against 44 people, including five rabbis. David Halbfinger, “44 Charged by U.S. in New Jersey Corruption Sweep,” The New York Times, July 24, 2009.
 Trump’s Electoral College win is due to his margin of victory in three states. He won Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by 0.2, 0.7 and 0.8 points, respectively and by 10,704, 46,765 and 22,177 votes (79, 646 total). Those three states gave him 46 electoral votes. Philip Bump, “Donald Trump will be president thanks to 80,000 people in three states.” The Washington Post, December 1, 2016.
 The closest adviser to Netanyahu (known as “Bibi’s brain”), Dermer co-authored with Natan Sharansky The Case for Democracy (2004). Sharansky’s book featured an endorsement by Zionist Christian President George W. Bush who is widely known as a non-reader.
 Often referred to in Israel as Bibiton (iton is Hebrew for newspaper), two years after its founding, Israeli voters returned Bibi Netanyahu to power. Confirming the close relationship between Jewish extremists in the U.S. and Israel, Netanyahu raised 90% of the funds for his December 2014 primary in the U.S. Zvi Zrahiya, “Funding for Netanyahu’s Likud Primary Campaign All From Abroad,” Haaretz, December 21, 2016
 Former President George W. Bush sought to curry favor with Adelson on behalf his brother, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush. At the April 2015 meeting of the Republican Jewish Coalition (Adelson is a major funder) held at the Adelson-owned Venetian hotel and casino in Las Vegas, Bush presented Adelson with a painting that he painted himself of the Adelson-owned casino in Singapore. The next month at a fundraiser in Manhattan, Jeb sought to curry favor among pro-Israel donors by assuring those present that his Zionist Christian brother is his most influential adviser on Israel and the Middle East.
 Marco Rubio was reportedly an early favorite. He was a Mormon for five years during his childhood. Billionaire Norman Braman, a south Florida (Jewish) auto dealer, produced the political career of Rubio who was reelected to the Senate in November 2016.
 Sheldon and Mariam Adelson also support Shmuley Boteach, an Orthodox rabbi who served as “spiritual adviser” to pop star Michael Jackson. Just prior to the annual AIPAC conference in March 2015, Boteach used Adelson’s support to place a full-page advertisement in The New York Times accusing Susan Rice, Obama’s National Security Adviser, of seeking genocide against Israel by pursuing a nuclear accord with Iran.
 Not since Winston Churchill has a prime minister addressed such a joint meeting three times. House Speaker John Boehner commemorated the event by presenting Netanyahu with a statue of Churchill. The influence of the Israel lobby was also on display when “our” Congress gave Netanyahu a raucous standing ovation of more than two minutes duration as mega-donors Sheldon and Miriam Adelson beamed their approval from the balcony. When Netanyahu speaks at the U.N., Adelson is typically provided a front row seat and the two of them share a lunch together afterward.
 That same (predominantly Jewish) neocon network also catalyzed the regime change crisis in Ukraine led by Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, the wife of neocon Robert Kagan, a co-founder with Kristol of the Project for a New American Century.
 In 2000, Michael Steinhardt and Charles R. Bronfman founded Taglit-Birthright Israel to pay for young Diaspora Jews to travel to Israel to discover their inner Zionist. Akin to Manifest Destiny, it operates on the premise that all Jewish people have a right to Palestinian land. Based on the idea of strengthening “solidarity among world Jewry,” Birthright Israel conflates Judaism, a religion, with political Zionism. Casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, its largest single funding source ($160 million as of 2013), was described in the June 23, 2012 New York Times as having “disgust for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.” Birthright supports the idea that to be Jewish is to be Zionist. Since its founding in 1999, more than 500,000 Jewish youth from 66 countries have participated in expense-paid trips to Israel, including 45,000 in 2015. See www.birthrightisrael.com. Funded largely by Americans with tax-deductible contributions, this program preys on Jewish identity while helping the Israeli Right replenish its corps of sayanim. For an explanation of how this nonlinear treason operates in plain sight, see Guilt By Association (pp. xxix-xxx): Sayanim (singular sayan) play an essential support role. Hebrew for volunteers or helpers, sayanim are shielded from culpability by being told only enough to perform their narrow role. Though they may play an essential task in the commission of a far broader crime, these volunteers could pass a polygraph test because Mossad recruiters ensure they are kept ignorant of the intended result. Akin to military reservists, sayanim are activated when their skills are required to support Israeli operations. They agree to remain “on call” for missions they believe are in the best interest of Israel. In effect, sayanim operate as a cost-effective undercover corps. When not actively engaged in an operation, they gather and report intelligence useful to Israel. The assistance of sayanim may be logistics, medical care, intelligence gathering or other assigned duties. Sayanim also operate as the people in between in legislative bodies worldwide. Morris Amitay, a former executive director of the Israel lobby (AIPAC), explains: ‘There are a lot of guys at the working level up here [on Capitol Hill]…who happen to be Jewish, who are willing…to look at certain issues in terms of their Jewishness…These are all guys who are in a position to make the decision in these areas for those senators…You can get an awful lot done just at the staff level.’” Quoted in Mitchell Bard, “Israeli Lobby Power,” Midstream 33, no. 1 (January 1987), p. 8. Cited in John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby (New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2007), p. 153.
 Maggie Haberman, “Hawks raise cash for Cotton,” Politico, June 27, 2013. Much as Birthright Israel preys on Jewish identity to support a Greater Israel agenda, the Singer-supported Philos Project targets Zionist Christians on a “Christian approach to foreign policy, especially as it relates to the Middle East” by “educating Christians on the theological, historical, and political issues surrounding Israel and the Jewish people.” Neocon Dan Senor serves on the Philos Project board of directors. If, as reported, President-elect Trump considered Liberty University President Jerry Falwell, Jr. for Secretary of Education, that only further confirms the extent to which this presidency is dominated by Israeli interests, including Zionist Christians on whose faith those profiled routinely prey. Liberty was founded in 1971 by televangelist and Moral Majority leader Jerry Falwell Sr. who died in 2007. Zionist Christian Senator Ted Cruz chose Liberty University as the venue from which to launch his presidential campaign. Donald Trump garnered 81 percent of the white evangelical vote. “Jerry Falwell Jr.: I turned down Cabinet position,” CBSNEWS.com, November 26, 2016.
 Eric Lipton, “G.O.P.’s Israel Support Deepens as Political Contributions Shift,” The New York Times, April 4, 2015. The role played by Sheldon Adelson and his Israeli wife is unclear.
 Irving Moskowitz died June 16, 2016 in Miami.
 Cotton’s behavior suggests he’s a classic asset who was identified, profiled and his political career produced by those identified. He is well positioned to replace asset John McCain. The production and management of McCain’s career is chronicled in Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008) aka “the McCain book.” See www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com for three chapters detailing McCain’s reliable performance. Like McCain, Cotton’s military career enables him to be portrayed as a patriot while pursuing an agenda for Greater Israel. Reflecting the ego-stroking common to those who produce such political assets, William Kristol proposed Cotton as the Republican presidential candidate for 2024 or 2028. Kristol helped persuade John McCain to put Sarah Palin as Vice President on his 2008 presidential ticket. Critics describe Cotton as “Sarah Palin with a Harvard degree.”
 FDD advisors, experts and members of its leadership council feature known Israeli agents and assets, including former Senator Joe Lieberman, Weekly Standard Editor William Kristol, former C.I.A. Director James Woolsey, Michael Ledeen, Wall Street Journal columnist Bret Stephens and syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer.
 See for example, an Israeli official caught on camera plotting to “take down” foreign office minister Sir Alan Duncan, a supporter of the two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Ian Cobain and Ewen MacAskill, “Israeli diplomat caught on camera plotting to ‘take down’ UK MPs,” The Guardian, January 7, 2017. See also a four-part series, “Israel’s penetration of the UK’s political system exposed,” Nureddin Sabir, Redress Information & Analysis, January 15, 2017.
 In November 2014, Romney flew from Alaska to Washington, D.C. aboard a private jet owned by Sheldon Adelson to headline the inaugural Washington, D.C. conference of the Israeli American Council founded in 2007 by Adelson as “a counterweight to AIPAC,” an organization that he and Miriam Adelson, his Israeli wife, view as insufficiently proactive in promoting policies of the Israeli Right. Dermer’s father and brother both served as mayor of Miami Beach. The role they played in Florida politics and organized crime further confirms why I was serially criminally stalked while residing in Miami for the first six months of 2005 and again when I visited that city in 2013. Miami area Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz served as chairperson of the Democratic National Committee from 2011 until forced to resign in July 2016 when a leak of her emails confirmed the validity of a complaint by presidential candidate Bernie Sanders that she was using the DNC to favor the Hillary Clinton campaign. Sanders advocated an end to the Israeli occupation and a more behavior-conditioned approach to U.S. support for Israel.
 I was routinely stalked by Mormons, including during my youth in Michigan where Mormon George Romney, Mitt’s father, served as Governor, in Tucson, Arizona by Mormon Warren Rustand and in Orange County, California by Mormon Doug Skeen. See Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008), notes 26 and 31 on pp. 215-216. See also draft chapters for The Hidden Tax on Humanity (the “Introduction” and “The Indonesia Connection”) on www.hiddentaxonhumaniy.com
 In December 28, 2016 remarks critical of the intransigence of the Israeli Right, Secretary of State John Kerry was candid on this key point: “…Jerusalem is the most sensitive issue for both sides, and the solution will have to meet the needs not only of the parties, but of all three monotheistic faiths. That is why the holy sites that are sacred to billions of people around the world must be protected and remain accessible and the established status quo maintained.”
 Secretary of State Kerry candidly described the facts on the ground in Israel: “…we have to be clear about what is happening in the West Bank. The Israeli prime minister publicly supports a two-state solution, but his current coalition is the most right wing in Israeli history, with an agenda driven by the most extreme elements.”
 View the seating chart for the inaugural with Sheldon and Mariam to Trump’s immediate right as he entered. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/20/us/politics/trump-inauguration-photo-zoomer.html?_r=0
 Sarah Pulliam Bailey, “White evangelicals voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump, exit polls show,” The Washington Post, November 9, 2016.
 Akin to madrassas in the Muslim faith, Schneerson-directed education stresses the unimportance of non-religious education and focuses on religious studies (“limmudei kodesh”). The goal is to produce missionaries (“schluchim”) to promote Chabad worldwide as emissaries of Rabbi Schneerson. As one who experienced the Chabad education in Crown Heights, New York (the worldwide headquarters of Chabad) Chaim Levin notes, “Basic reading, writing, spelling, math, science and history were not part of the curriculum at any of the Chabad schools I attended….Failure to provide basic formal education cripples children with Chabad communities.” Chaim Levin, “National Education Day and the Education I Never Had,” Huffington Post, April 4, 2012. See also Alison Weir, “Why is the U.S. Honoring a Racist Rabbi?” Counterpunch, April 7 2014.
 In 1994, Christian Zionist House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia and Jewish Zionist Congressman Charles Schumer of New York and others sponsored legislation to award Schneerson the Congressional Gold Medal. The bill passed by unanimous consent. In November 2006, former President Jimmy Carter published, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. Confirming the influence of the Israel lobby, this former Democratic Party President was denied an opportunity to speak from the dais at the August 2008 Democratic Party convention in Denver. Since Rabbi Schneerson dispatched Rabbi Berl Lazar to Russia in 1990, Chabad members, a small fraction of a small religious community, have emerged as the dominant force in Russian Jewish life, reportedly with 80% of synagogues led by ultra-orthodox Chabad rabbis. Lazar was designated by Vladimir Putin as Russia’s chief rabbi. Joshua Keating, “Putin’s Chosen People,” The World, November 28, 2014. Critics charge that Lazar is “firmly” in the tradition of “court Jews under the Czar.” Guy Chazan, “In Russia, a Top Rabbi Uses Kremlin Ties to Gain Power,” The Wall Street Journal, May 8, 2007.
 Breitbart.com published a YouTube video chronicling their visit to the gravesite (known as the Ohel) of a rabbi whose influence, according to Chabad devotees, extends beyond the grave. See http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/05/rebbe-ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-visit-lubavitcher-rebbes-grave-ohel/ See also: Ivanka Trump visits the Lubavitcher rebbe’s grave ahead of election, Jewish Telegraph News, November 6, 2016. Jared Kushner served as president of Chabad House while attending Harvard University.
 A donation of $10,000 was given to Friends of Beit El Institutions, the U.S. fundraising arm for a West Bank settlement. Trump bankruptcy attorney David Friedman serves as the organization’s president. Judy Maltz, “Kushner Foundation Gives $342K to Chabad—Still Surprised About Jared and Ivanka’s Synagogue?,” Haaretz, January 9, 2017.
 “Israel’s Alarming Settlement Bill,” The New York Times (editorial), November 17, 2016.
 Diminished U.S. support for the U.N. may well increase the global influence of the People’s Republic of China consistent with the long-term geopolitical strategy pursued by Jewish elites and extremists, as chronicled in “The China Connection” chapter for The Hidden Tax on Humanity posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com. This agenda may be a key reason why those who produced the Trump presidency want to see U.N. skeptic John Bolton part of Team Trump. Reports confirm that son-in-law Jared Kushner is collaborating with key oligarchs in “communist” China, including Wu Ziaohui, chairman of Anbang Insurance Group with an estimated $295 billion in assets under management and an ownership structure shrouded in mystery. Emerging facts support the Hidden Tax premise that a cadre of Jews advised Mao to finance the People’s Liberation Army largely with stakes in transnational corporations, making China’s military dependent on its support for global financial markets: “Records show early Anbang directors included Levin Zhu, son of a former prime minister, and Chen Xiaolu, the son of an army marshal who helped bring Communist rule to China….” Mr. Wu married the granddaughter of Deng Xiaoping, the Chinese leader who led China out of the Maoist era. See Michael Forsythe and Jonathan Ansfield, “A Chinese Mystery: Who Owns a Firm on a Global Shopping Spree?” The New York Times, September 1, 2016. See also “ Susanne Craig, Jo Roberts and Jesse Drucker, “Jared Kushner, a Trump In-Law and Adviser, Chases a Chinese Deal,” The New York Times, January 7, 2017. See also Steven Davidoff Solomon, “The Unsettling Acquisitiveness of Anbang, a Chinese Insurer, in the U.S., The New York Times, March 22, 2016.
 In a telling rebuke of the occupation, Kahneman concedes, as an Israeli, he has “very strong feelings about Israel as an occupier” while confessing, “I don’t believe in the power of rational argument in this context.” David Shariatmadari, “Daniel Kahneman: ‘What would I eliminate if I had a magic wand? Overconfidence.’” The Guardian, July 15, 2015.
 Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are Jewish-Americans as is Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.
 Joseph Dussault, “Facebook’s news algorithm promotes 9/11 ‘truther’ article,” The Christian Science Monitor, September 11, 2016. See Chapter 1 of Guilt By Association titled, “Game Theory and the Mass Murder of 9/11” also available online on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 “Facebook and Israel to work to monitor posts that incite violence,” The Guardian, September 12, 2016.
 “The harsh truth about fake news,” Financial Times, November 22, 2016, p. 9.
 See Armin Rosen, “Trump’s Jews,” Tablet, July 15, 2016.
 Their Zionist agenda motivated Adelson and his Israeli wife to give a reported $50 million to the 2012 presidential campaigns of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Zionist Christian, and Mitt Romney, a Mormon (aka the Lost Tribe of Israel). In June 2016, Gingrich proposed the creation of a new House Un-American Activities Committee to combat Islamic extremists. He said nothing about Jewish extremists. It’s unclear how much of Adelson’s $30 billion personal fortune was deployed to sway voters in the key Electoral College states required for Trump to emerge as “our” Commander-in-Chief.
 My December 20, 2016 memo to Tillerson can be found on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 Benjamin Netanyahu presently serves as both Prime Minister and Foreign Minister.
 In 1995, I met with Anatoly Sobchak who was then serving as mayor of St. Petersburg (1991-96). His deputy was Vladimir Putin whose deputy was Dmitry Medvedev. See photograph of us accompanying the draft chapter for Hidden Tax on Humanity titled, “The Indonesia Connection” on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 From Guilt By Association (p. xxix): “Assets are people profiled such that, within an acceptable range of probabilities, they can be relied upon to behave consistent with their personality profile. Assets lack the state of mind required for criminal culpability because they lack the conscious intent to commit a crime. Nevertheless, they can contribute to a criminal operation simply by pursuing their subconscious personal needs, typically for recognition, influence, money, sex, drugs or ideology. Put a profiled asset in a pre-staged time, place and circumstance (such as a presidency) and psy-ops specialists can be confident that—within an acceptable range of probabilities—an asset will behave consistent with their profile, much as Bill Clinton behaved with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Just as Christian Zionist presidents from Harry Truman to G.W. Bush were reliable and pliable advocates for pro-Israeli policies, the consistency of a candidate’s conduct confirms his or her qualifications as a pro-Israeli asset.”
 In May 2008, Senor joined a delegation that accompanied President Bush to Jerusalem for the celebration of Israel’s 60th anniversary. In September 2012, Senor said that Obama’s failure to overthrow Syrian President Assad made the U.S. look “impotent.” John McCain appeared May 27, 2013 in Syria voicing support for opposition forces. Two weeks later, McCain and Bill Clinton appeared together in a June 11th forum in New York for the McCain Institute for International Leadership where Clinton agreed with McCain on Syria and called Obama a “wuss” and a “total fool” if he remained too cautious in his approach toward Syria. Clinton’s support for McCain further confirmed that both men are reliable assets whose political careers were produced and managed by the same parties. I am confident that Clinton was told to change the text of his speech while enroute to Israel for the June 19th celebration of the 90th birthday of Shimon Peres that was also attended by reliable asset Tony Blair. To the surprise of his hosts, instead of his prepared text, Clinton said that unless Israel accepts the two-state solution, Israel may cease to exist. He also agreed to donate his $500,000 honorarium to charitable causes in Israel. In national security circles, Shimon Peres is best known for deceiving the U.S. when he led Israeli efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. My experience interacting my entire life with those chronicled suggests that President Kennedy’s insistence in June 1963 that Israel shut down their nuclear weapons program led to his assassination in November 1963.
 Senor previously advised Lt. General Jay Garner who was appointed in 2003 as Director of the Office for Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance for Iraq following the March 2003 invasion. Garner was soon replaced by Paul Bremer and the successor organization to ORHA, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA).
 Dan Senor exemplifies the nonlinear and nontransparent way that this influence works without the public’s knowledge and regardless of political affiliation. In 2009, he founded the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) with neocons William Kristol and Robert Kagan, co-founders in 1997 of the now defunct Project for A New American Century advocating regime change in Iraq—to which FPI is a neocon successor. FPI Directors include Eric Edelman, a Greater Israel adviser to Dick Cheney, Mitt Romney and Marco Rubio. Victoria Nuland, Kagan’s wife and Obama Administration Assistant Secretary of State for Europe, was active in bringing about regime change in Ukraine, including a February 2014 phone call with the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine in which she is recorded saying, “f–k the EU.” After neocons sparked a new Cold War with a putsch in Kiev, Carl Gershman, president of the neocon-dominated National Endowment for Democracy, called for regime change in Moscow. Carl Gershman, “Remembering a journalist who was killed for standing up to Putin,” The Washington Post, October 6, 2016. Countering those pursuing a Greater Israel agenda, Putin helped orchestrate Syria’s surrender of its chemical weapons and assisted us in negotiating the nuclear weapons accord with Iran. Both initiatives countered Israeli political pressure for U.S.-led wars in those countries.
 For 15 years, his sister, Wendy Senor Singer, was Director of the Jerusalem office of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). She retired in 2013 after 23 years with AIPAC.
 For clear evidence of systemic problems within the D.I.A., see the experience chronicled in “The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented” posted online at www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 White House speechwriter David Frum (Jewish) originated the phrase “Axis of Evil” that first appeared in George Bush’s 2002 State of the Union address, linking Iran, Iraq and North Korea. In 2004, neocon Richard Perle, former (Jewish) chair of the U.S. Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee, 2001-2003, co-authored with Frum An End to Evil (2004). The recurring need for a plausible enemy is closely associated with the hate-mongering routinely pursued by those adept at waging war by way of deception.
 For an indication of the lengthy pre-staging traceable to this same source, see “The China Connection” on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com. The influence of Jared Kushner reportedly includes positioning him within the Trump transition team so that, when Beijing called to express “deep displeasure” at Mr. Trump’s break with diplomatic tradition by speaking directly with the president of Taiwan, that call was relayed from the White House not through the Trump national security team but through Mr. Kushner—whose firm has Chinese investors and was then in the midst of negotiations with Anbang Insurance Group. Reported in Susanne Craig, Jo Roberts and Jesse Drucker, “Jared Kushner, a Trump In-Law and Adviser, Chases a Chinese Deal,” The New York Times, January 7, 2017.
 While working as a New Republic correspondent in Italy for editor Martin Peretz, CIA station files described Michael Ledeen as an agent of influence of a foreign government (Israel). Ledeen was then hired in 1981 by neocon Paul Wolfowitz, director of policy planning at the State Department. In 1983, he was hired on the recommendation of neocon Richard Perle as a Defense Department consultant on terrorism before becoming a consultant to the National Security Council and later a consultant to the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans led by neocon Douglas Feith. He previously served on the board of the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs along with Richard Perle and Stephen Bryen. Part of the neocon-dominated American Enterprise Institute, he is also affiliated with the pro-Israel Foundation for Defense of Democracies where Joe Lieberman serves as an adviser along with former C.I.A. Director James Woolsey, an outspoken neocon and key promoter of the false intelligence that took us to war in Iraq by claiming a meeting in Praque five months before 9/11 between lead terrorist Mohammad Atta and a senior Iraqi official.
 The serial criminal staking to which I have been subjected—still ongoing—is done in collaboration with Israeli agents such as Jerome Corsi, author of numerous pro-Israeli psy-ops books made into New York Times best-sellers, including Unfit for Command, Atomic Iran, The Obama Nation and Why Israel Can’t Wait. For Corsi’s role, see “The Poland Connection,” a draft excerpt from the The Hidden Tax on Humanity, posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
 See “The Indonesia Connection” on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
 We also discussed the Taliban’s destruction in Afghanistan of the two ancient Buddhas of Bamiyan 140 miles northwest of Kabul. With that high profile incident, radical Islamic extremism was injected into the global field of consciousness, preparing minds for a narrative that would gain traction with the provocation of 9/11. The Bamiyan crisis was widely reported in U.S. media as a cultural “holocaust” when staged six months prior to 9/11. The destruction by ISIL/ISIS of World Heritage sites in Syria at Palmyra may serve a similar narrative-advancing role.
 Trump’s campaign stance on immigration, if pursued, threatens to further fracture the nation, beginning with some 39 “sanctuary cities” throughout the U.S.
 “Exclusive Interview: How Jared Kushner Won Trump the White House,” Forbes, November 22, 2016.
 Joel B. Pollak, “Stephen K. Bannon: Friend of the Jewish People, Defender of Israel,” www.breitbart.com November 14, 2016. Mr. Pollak, who describes himself as an Orthodox Jew, serves as Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News.
 Widely regarded as a conspiracy theorist, Gaffney began his government career in the 1970s as an assistant to (Jewish) neocon Richard Perle while working as an aide in the office of Democratic Senator Henry (“Scoop”) Jackson.
 In his writings, Breivik expressed his support for the ethno-nationalism of Israel’s “far-right Zionism.” Two days prior to this mass murder, the grave in Germany holding the remains of Adolph Hitler deputy Rudolf Hesse was destroyed to ensure that it could no longer be used as a pilgrimage site by neo-Nazis. In February 2012, Geller’s website, Atlas Shrugged, published the Islam-disparaging film, “A Movie about Muhammad: An Idea Whose Time Has Come.” Her website promotes the market fundamentalist theories of Ayn Rand (né Russian novelist Alisa Rosenbaum) that emerged as a core premise of the (now globalized) Washington consensus. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan served on Rand’s board of editors at The Objectivist. House Speaker and former Romney Vice-Presidential candidate Paul Ryan credits her writings for his entry into politics. A movie based on the Rand bestseller, Atlas Shrugged, opened in theatres October 2012 the same week that the vice-presidential debates were televised. In September 2012, Geller posted ads in New York subway stations, “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.” U.S. District Court Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted Geller a judgment that deemed her provocative posters free speech-protected. John Bolton, a G.W. Bush recess appointee as U.N. Ambassador, wrote the foreword for Geller’s 2010 book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America.
 Right on cue, the Southern Poverty Law Center, long complicit in this deceit, mailed a fundraising letter the week of January 23, 2016 quoting David Duke’s support (“our people played a HUGE role in electing Trump”) and touting founder Morris Dees as a leader “in the fight against the barrage of hate that Donald Trump’s victory has unleashed.”
 From November 9 to November 10, 1938, in an incident known as Kristallnacht (the breaking of glass), German Nazis torched synagogues, vandalized Jewish homes, schools and businesses and killed close to 100 Jews.
 Lt. General Michael Flynn was appointed National Security Adviser, General James N. Mattis was nominated as Secretary of Defense, a position typically held by a civilian, and General John Kelly was named Secretary of Homeland Security. Soon after leaving his post a head of Central Command, General Mattis expressed his concern that Israel was heading toward “apartheid,” and questioned the price that America has paid in the region for being identified with Israeli behavior. Bernard Avishai, ”Is Trump the Friend Israel Needs,” The New York Times, January 1, 2017. In his Senate confirmation hearings, the written testimony submitted by General Mattis described Iran as the “biggest destabilizing force in the Middle East.” Israel, since its recognition as a legitimate state, has proven itself the region’s most consistent destabilizing force. The Joint Chiefs foresaw this outcome in the post-war era when they urged President Harry Truman to withhold U.S. recognition, anticipating that Zionist extremists would draw the U.S. into serial conflicts in the region. Michael R. Gordon and Helene Cooper, “James Mattis Strikes Far Harsher Tone Than Trump on Russia,” The New York Times, January 12, 2017. For my memos to Generals Mattis and Kelly, see www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 My life experience suggests that Donald Trump, the son of a well-known New Jersey real estate developer, may well have been identified and profiled at an early age and his business success produced (in gambling, pop culture and real estate) by those who dominate those sectors in a city long dominated by those I profiled for more than 35 years.
 In October 2006, Trump gave “shock radio” host Howard Stern permission to call his daughter Ivanka Trump “a piece of ass.” The subprime mortgage fraud hit the real estate industry in 2007-2008. Jared Kushner married Ivanka Trump in October 2009. With the public denied access to his tax returns, it’s difficult to know how Trump weathered the Great Recession with a real estate business model known to rely on enormous amounts of debt. For example, could the Trump Organization have received a financial lifeline from one or more of the Russian-Jewish oligarchs such as Roman Abramovich, a supporter of Chabad Lubavitch? Knowing how those profiled operate, Donald Trump may have proffered his daughter in return for help from this transnational (predominantly Jewish) network. An analogy emerged during the financial pillaging of Russia after asset Boris Yeltsin was placed in the presidency and, soon after his resignation, Oleg Deripaska married Polima Yumasheva, the daughter of Yeltsin adviser Valentin Yumashev who, 18 months later, married Yeltsin’s younger daughter Tatyana, making Polina the step-granddaughter of Yeltsin and Deripaska a member of the Yeltsin family through marriage. Polina and Oleg met at the home of Abramovich who was then Deripaska’s business partner. By 2006, Russian-Jewish oligarchs Abramovich and Deripaska (then 38) vied for the title of Russia’s richest man (Deripaska then had a net worth $14 billion). By 2008, Deripaska was estimated by Forbes to have a personal wealth of $28 billion with Abramovich’s wealth an estimated $23.6 billion. In 2000, Mikhail Chernoy, Deripaska’s commodity trading partner in Siberia, fled to self-imposed exile in Israel. Andrew Kramer, “Out of Siberia, a Russian Way to Wealth,” The New York Times, August 20, 2006. On August 7, 2014, Abramovich attended the grand opening of the $18 million Chabad Jewish Community Center Aspen Valley occupying a full city block in downtown Aspen, Colorado. Carin M. Smik, “Aspen to Welcome Mega Jewish Center,” Chabad.org, July 29 2014. This town of 6,500 is home to the Aspen Institute founded in 1950 and led by Walter Isaacson. The Institute is described as “a non-partisan forum for values-based leadership.” See www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com for a draft chapter titled “The People in Between” chronicling how a few can wield vast influence through the manipulation of consensus thought and opinion.
 Judging solely from the surnames, the list includes not only bankruptcy attorney David Friedman and general counsel Jason Greenblatt but also special counsel Michael Cohen, general counsel Alan Garten, chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg, construction head Andrew Weiss, management and development head Ronald Lieberman, strategic development head Larry Glick, hotel operations chief Jeff Waggoner and executive assistant Rhona Graff. Megan Twohey, Buss Buettner and Steve Eder, “Trump Name Amplifies A Mom-and-Pop Empire,” The New York Times, December 26, 2016.
 See online the Introduction to The Hidden Tax on Humanity for a first-person account of how, at the 1968 Republican convention in Miami Beach, Maryland Governor Spiro Agnew was informed—by those who would not remove him from office until 1973—that they had the ability to remove him well before he became Vice President to Richard Nixon. With the removal of Richard Nixon, the unelected Vice President Gerald Ford, a Congressman from my home state of Michigan, became “our” unelected President. Those who produced his presidency created “Plan B” under the leadership of (Jewish) neocon Richard Pipes. Purportedly created to supplement pre-existing intelligence assessments, that effort (as we now know) greatly exaggerated the Soviet threat, justifying an expansion in profitable debt-financed defense spending during the Reagan and G.H.W. Bush presidencies. A similar fraud was perpetrated by those who produced the G.W. Bush presidency when they created the Pentagon-based Office of Special Plans. As we now know, that office “fixed” the intelligence deployed to justify a war in Iraq—for Greater Israel. That Bush-era Plan B effort was led by (Jewish) neocon Douglas Feith with critical assistance provided by Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Lewis Libby, Chief of Staff to Vice President Dick Cheney. Donald Trump’s criticism of our intelligence agencies suggests that those who produced his presidency will create a similar Plan B intelligence operation designed to justify the next war—for Greater Israel. A Trump-era fixed-intelligence operation akin to the Bush-era Office of Special Plans could be formed, for example, in the State Department Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Daniel Pipes, son of Richard, heads Campus Watch, a nationwide effort dedicated to silencing on-campus criticism of Israeli policy and any discussion of the Palestinian issue. Critics are routinely portrayed as anti-Semites.
 Seventeen years with The Jerusalem Post, CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer is featured on a cable network branded globally “the most trusted name in news.” His broadcasting booth, branded “The Situation Room,” grants him credibility by its association with the White House Situation Room. In 1989, he published Territory of Lies, a sympathetic account of Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard. For an essay chronicling the five key domains where such “people in between” operate to deceive in plain sight, see “Dialogue and the Exploitation of Thought” (2010) on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com. See also online “The People in Between,” a draft chapter for The Hidden Tax on Humanity.
 “During a 2015 trip to Russia, Donald Trump’s pick for national security adviser, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, said he didn’t know whether the 2013 sarin gas attack in Syria was conducted by the Syrian Army or by other forces in an attempt to draw the U.S. into the conflict” (i.e., a false flag attack). At the time of the attack, General Flynn was director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Andrew Kaczynski, CNN, November 20, 2016.
 Strategists in nonlinear warfare also target the public’s faith in institutions of governance and the legitimacy of law. Undermine informed choice and confidence in the rule of law and who emerges victorious? Answer: those duplicitous few who consider themselves Chosen and above the law. In Russia, nonlinear war is known as the Gerasimov doctrine, named after Valery Gerasimov, Chief of the Russian General Staff. Those I profiled while being stalked have long been skilled at eroding the ability to distinguish fact from fiction. Thus their need for dominance in pop culture, particularly cinema, and mainstream media. With each fraud on us—enabled by our entangled alliance with Israel—we become weaker and more fractured. Thus the targeting of informed choice by a foe that subverts by controlling information and intelligence to shape our reactions to well-timed crises. See Molly K. McKew, “Putin’s Real Long Game,” Politico, January 1, 2017.
 “Reflexive control is defined as a means of conveying to a partner or an opponent specially prepared information to incline him to voluntarily make the predetermined decision desired by the initiator of the action.” “Russia’s Reflexive Control Theory and the Military,”Timothy Thomas, Journal of Slavic Military Studies 17: 237–256, 2004
 Duplicity may also have been deployed when, on January 3, 2016, Republican Congressional leaders led a high-profile fight to reverse a Republican proposal from the previous day that would have weakened ethics oversight. When Trump joined the opposition, media reports made it appear that the most “ethics-free” president in the modern-era rose to the defense of Congressional ethics. Was this the political ploy: create a problem and then pretend you solved it? Organized crime famously insured properties it then torched, an oft-deployed fraud that became known as “Jewish lightning.”
 Of the $750,000 raised by Durbin in his 1982 Congressional race, $685,000 reportedly came from Jewish donors. When, in 1984, the lobby bragged about their removal from Congress of Congressman Pete McCloskey and Senator Chuck Percy (the father-in-law of my cousin, former Senator John D. Rockefeller IV), that Israeli operation served notice on every member of Congress—and any aspirant for public office—that whatever Israel wants, Israel gets—or your career in public service is over (or never begins). See Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out (1985).
 I am confident that Senator John Kerry was named to this foreign policy position by President Obama due, at least in part, to the role played by his father in confirming the long-running duplicity that typifies the U.S.-Israel “special relationship.” In mid-1959, while serving as a political officer at the U.S. embassy in Oslo, Richard Kerry learned that Norway was selling Israel 20 tons of heavy water, a key ingredient for the Dimona reactor where Israel manufactured its nuclear weapons. Avner Cohen and William Burr, “How Israel Hid Its Secret Nuclear Weapons Program,” Politico, April 15, 2015. Attempts by President Kennedy to shutter Israel’s nuclear weapons program led, I believe, to his assassination. As explained in the Introduction to The Hidden Tax on Humanity, in 1964, at age 12, I connected my step-uncle to those who ordered the assassination of President Kennedy when he sought to deprive Zionist extremists of this weapon of mass destruction while his brother Bobby, then Attorney General, sought to force the Zionist Council of America to register as foreign agents. With Kennedy’s assassination, that registration requirement was abandoned by President Lyndon Johnson as the Council morphed into the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). LBJ also abandoned the Kennedy initiative meant to preclude the introduction of nuclear weapons into the volatile Middle East.
 In April 2016, Senator Sanders was provided two detailed memos chronicling the common (pro-Israeli) source of this duplicity and ongoing treason, its implications for national security and the cost that this hidden tax has long imposed on people and the planet. That correspondence is posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 Ellis Shuman, “Pollards reject $1M Israeli compensation offer,” Haaretz, August 31, 2001.
 See “The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented” posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com. It’s difficult to overstate the troubling Constitution issues posed by this presidency. What if an informed military refuses the command of their Commander-in-Chief to wage a war that they know is being waged not for the U.S. but for Greater Israel? What then for the future of the democratic principle of civilian control over our armed forces?
 Susanne Craig, Jo Roberts and Jesse Drucker, “Jared Kushner, a Trump In-Law and Adviser, Chases a Chinese Deal,” The New York Times, January 7, 2017.
 Double blind covers are explained in more detail on the Hidden Tax on Humanity website.
 While in Algiers in 2010, I cautioned Algerian leaders that the Israelis would enter North Africa through Libya. I knew this for several reasons. Guilt By Association (at pp. 3-5) describes how a Mossad operation in February 1986 (Operation Trojan) deceived President Ronald Reagan to order the April 1986 bombing of Tripoli and Benghazi (Operation Condor). Though this Israeli operation was launched 15 years prior to 9/11, Mossad operatives conceded it was part of the pre-staging for inducing the U.S. to invade Iraq and take out Saddam Hussein: “After the bombing of Libya, our friend Qadhafi is sure to stay out of the picture for some time. Iraq and Saddam Hussein are the next target. We’re starting now to build him up as the big villain. It was take some time, but in the end, there’s no doubt that it’ll work.” Cited in a book by Mossad case officer Victor Ostrovsky, The Other Side of Deception (New York: HarperCollins, 1994), pp. 113-117. In addition, I was twice invited to meet with Saif al-Islam Qadhafi, first in London and then in Tripoli. The London meeting was canceled when he instead met with a contingent of Jewish colleagues at an estate outside London belonging to Nathan Rothschild V. Attendees included former British MP Peter Mandelson and Russian-Jewish oligarch Oleg Deripaska. French-Jewish author Bernard-Henri Levy arranged for French President Nicolas Sarkozy to meet with Libyan rebel leaders in Paris. Weeks later, France intervened militarily in Libya. After Qadhafi’s fall, Levy was with Sarkozy on stage when the president delivered a speech in Benghazi.
 His selection of Rabbi Marvin Hier to officiate at his inaugural only further confirmed the extent to which this trans-generational criminal syndicate was directly involved in creating the Trump presidency. I first encountered Hier in 1991-92 at the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles where he continues to serve as dean. Though it was clear that he knew my true identity as the son of Nelson Rockefeller, he was arrogant and dismissive and refused to assist me in any way even though I was accompanied by a man I was counseling whose parents were Holocaust survivors. I later had an encounter with Hier and New York Congressman Chuck Schumer. “The Hiers and the Kushners have gone to the same kosher for Passover resort, the Arizona Biltmore, over the years.” Gabrielle Berkner, “Marvin Hier ‘Proud’ To Be Trump’s Inauguration Rabbi,” Forward, January 5, 2017. Rabbi Hier also played an active role in a silencing campaign launched on the campus of the University of California Santa Barbara when sociology Professor William Robinson, a secular Jew, protested the Israeli invasion of Gaza in December 2008. Coordinated by Abe Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, that faculty-targeted intimidation campaign helped silence potential protests at campuses nationwide. Rabbi Hier helped put pressure on UCSB Chancellor Henry Yang by organizing potential donors to threaten the withdrawal of funds unless Prof. Robinson’s tenure was revoked. See “Bill Robinson vs. the ADL Thought Police,” Intifada Palestine, July 12, 2009. http://www.intifada-palestine.com/2009/07/bill-robinson-vs-the-adl-thought-police/ UC President Mark Yudof could have stopped a campaign designed to chill on-campus debate. What role was played by the pro-Israeli bias of his wife, Judith, the immediate past president of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism representing 760 synagogues? Janet Napolitano was recruited to replace Mr. Yudof.
 Post-election, Prince Turki al-Faisal, former Saudi intelligence chief and ex-ambassador to Washington and London, urged on November 10, 2016 that the Iran accord remain intact: “To scrap that willy-nilly as it were will have ramifications, and I don’t know if something else can be put in its place to guarantee that Iran will not go that route if the agreement is scrapped.”
 For an explanation of game theory warfare and Israeli expertise in this geostrategic form of duplicity, see Chapter 1 of Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. The chapter, titled “Game Theory and the Mass Murder of 9/11,” can be found on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
 John McCain is a classic asset whose political career was produced by (Jewish and Mormon) organized crime. He has performed reliably since being placed in the House and then the Senate (replacing Senator Barry Goldwater) where he chairs the Committee on Armed Services. The 2008 release, Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self Deceit Took America to War is also known as “the McCain book” with three chapters chronicling how his dysfunctional persona was profiled and his political career produced by those chronicled. See chapters posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
 Israel is notorious for staging well-timed crises and geostrategic provocations. For example, Operation Cast Lead killed some 1,400 Palestinians, including at least 300 minors under age 18 and wounded 5,000. That provocation was timed to begin two days after Christmas 2008 and conclude two days prior to the Obama inaugural of January 20, 2009. Similarly, Israel’s Operation Sinai (aka the Suez Crisis) was timed for the last week of President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s re-election campaign in November 1956. The propensity of the Israel lobby to stage war-catalyzing provocations (using well-timed crises) again became clear when WINEP’s Patrick Clawson candidly called for “crisis initiation” and a false-flag incident to “step up the pressure” for a U.S. war with Iran. Capturing such Zionist candor on film is both instructive and highly unusual. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfoaLbbAix0&feature=player_embedded The Washington Institute for Near East Policy was founded as the research arm of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a key component of the expansive Israel lobby. Founded as the American Zionist Council, Attorney General Robert Kennedy and Senator J. William Fulbright, chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, sought to force the Council to comply with the requirements of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). At the same time (1962-63), President Kennedy sought to shut down the Israel’s nuclear weapons program. With the murder of Kennedy and his replacement by Lyndon Johnson, both initiatives were abandoned. AIPAC continues to function without FARA compliance while operating out of a Washington headquarters built with the help of a reported $10 million gift provided by Jewish extremists Sheldon Adelson and his Israeli wife.
 “’I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,’ Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center. Putin was referencing the library of Rabbi Joseph I. Schneerson, the late leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. The books, which are claimed by Chabad representatives in the United States, began being moved to the museum in Moscow this month.” “Putin: First Soviet Government Was Mostly Jewish,” Jewish World News, June 20, 2013.
 From March 2013 The Costs of War Project by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University drawn from actual expenditures by the U.S. Treasury and future commitments. The figure $1.7 trillion includes war expenses and an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans. An extra $4 trillion factors in interest paid through 2053.
 One of the leaders of the settler movement invited to the Trump inaugural was candid in describing for how long Israeli leaders have deceived U.S. leaders while steadily taking more land for settlements. According to Oded Revivi, the mayor of the West Bank settlement of Efrat, “You could basically argue that it has taken 50 years, since 1967, to be recognized on such a level for such an event.” Jennifer Williams, “Why Trump’s team invited leaders of Israel’s settler movement to attend the inauguration,” Vox,com, January 20, 2017.
 See “The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented” on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 The first head of Homeland Security was Presidential Assistant Bernie Kerik who was forced to resign when his ties to organized crime as a New York Police Commissioner were exposed. The first Secretary of DHS was Tom Ridge, former Governor of Pennsylvania from that state’s mobbed-up political machine previously overseen by publisher and GOP diplomat Walter Annenberg, son of Chicago mobster Moses (“Mo”) Annenberg. According to Nancy Reagan, Walter was “Ronnie’s best friend for 50 years.” The second Secretary of DHS was Michael Chertoff from a long family line of rabbis and previously in charge of the criminal division at the Department of Justice where he reportedly allowed several known Mossad suspects to return to Israel after 9/11. Former Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano took over from Chertoff. In December 2005, I submitted to Governor Napolitano and Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, a 3-volume compilation of facts and analyses proving the common source of this trans-generational criminality. Had those materials been engaged in good faith and investigated, the common source of this systemic corruption and ongoing treason could have been identified and addressed more than 11 years ago. In September 2013, Ms. Napolitano became President of the University of California recruited by her predecessor Mark Yudoff whose wife, Judith, was immediate past international president of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism representing 760 synagogues. When Jeh C. Johnson stepped down as the fourth Secretary of Homeland Security in January 2016, he returned to the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. The Paul Weiss firm aided the parties stalking me in China in 2000 as chronicled in “The China Connection” posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com. Simon Rifkind led the opposition to Attorney General Robert Kennedy’s attempt to force the Zionist Council of America to comply with the Foreign Agents Registration Act, an initiative supported by President John F. Kennedy and advanced through hearings convened by Senator J. William Fulbright, then chair of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. With the Kennedy assassination in November 1963, that effort collapsed, the Council morphed into AIPAC and its operations remain unregistered even as AIPAC actively lobbied for war in Syria and against the Iran nuclear accord. See above for the agenda-advancing role played in this nonlinear corruption by “fields within fields…within fields” of relationships.
 In his January 2017 release, The Genius of Judaism, French-Jewish philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy traces the Jews’ “misunderstanding with the nations” to their definition as a “chosen people.” Rather than their superiority, he suggests that their chosen status means that Jews are the guardians of a “treasure of knowledge.”
 For timeline, see “The U.S. Has Only Been At Peace For 21 Years Total Since Its Birth,” Information Clearing House, February 23, 2015.
 See a description of Lyndon Johnson’s role in Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008). Several chapters can be found on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 “The Samson Option” is the name given by some game theory war planners and authors to Israel’s deterrence strategy of massive retaliation with nuclear weapons as a last resort against a country whose military has destroyed much of Israel. See Seymour Hersh, The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy (1991). See also the May 2002 release of the film, Sum of All Fears based on a 1991 book by Tom Clancy. What is not yet known is how those identified in this account may use their nuclear arsenal when faced with the prospect of accountability at law for trans-generational crimes against humanity.
 This corruption is not traceable to a person or several people. If Benjamin Netanyahu is removed from office or Sheldon Adelson dies, this trans-generational criminality will continue because it’s imbedded in a mindset shared by those who view themselves as The Chosen. Whenever Israeli leaders have risked by their behavior exposure of Israel’s role in this duplicity, they have routinely been removed from office, typically with a well-timed scandal. See Peter Beaumont Jerusalem, “Benjamin Netanyahu under pressure as investigation details leak,” The Guardian, January 8, 2017.
 For facts and analyses provided to President Obama, see www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.